User talk:Elephant445956

Harlem Shake (song)

"The sample can be traced back to a remix of Mr. Delgado's 2006 single 'Maldades' (The New York Times) isento (talk) 01:53, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/H%C3%A9ctor_el_Father#%22Harlem_Shake%22_controversy

Clearly says it is from Los Terroristas. There was already another discussion on this page. I don't think one reliable source making a mistake is correct information. The sample pack that Bauuer sampled also does contain a sample from Maldades, but the part sampled is from Los Terroristas. I was able to find a remix on YouTube that seemed to mash up the 2 songs, but the "con las terroristas" line sounds different than heard in Harlem Shake and if you listen to the original Los Terroristas you can hear that exact line only a few seconds in. The NYT made a mistake; if they reported that black people were naturally far dumber than white people would that be put on an article? I don't think so. It is very, very easy to notice that the line comes from Los Terroristas, not Maldades and that the NYT made a simple mistake. Elephant445956 (talk) 02:21, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"...'Con los terroristas,' which was a refrain on his 2006 single 'Maldades' and popped up occasionally in his other songs. (Rolling Stone)

"...Delgado who sang 'Con los terroristas' on his 2006 single Maldades" (The Guardian)

"Delgado's vocal sample comes from the song 'Maldades'" (Pitchfork)

"Delgado's Maldades and Miller Time by Musson's former rap group Plastic Little are said to be sampled in Harlem Shake." (Straits Times/Associated Press) isento (talk) 02:58, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can you just listen to Maldades? Elephant445956 (talk) 02:23, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Get Closer (Linda Ronstadt album). Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 15:25, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Paul Begaud, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 15:32, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Go to the Wikipedia pages for those songs. You will see right there that my edits were correct, either that or the Wikipedia pages are wrong. Elephant445956 (talk) 16:28, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You cannot use other Wikipedia pages as your basis. See WP:USERG. BMI Songview Search shows that the song " It's Gonna Work Out Fine" was written by McCoy and McKinney, not Joe Seneca. And at the Paul Begaud bio, the cited source says it was a number 1 song, not a number 2 song: "Two Australian songwriters penned the recent number 1 country song in America..." Binksternet (talk) 17:42, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But the actual country charts say it only went to #1. Not every reliable source gets everything right. I don't see how there's any better source for whether or not a song went to #1 on the country chart than the actual chart Elephant445956 (talk) 17:58, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

only went to #2

Elephant445956 (talk) 17:59, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, Billboard's website says it went to number 2. The author who wrote "number 1 country song" might have been referring to its Radio & Records rank. Binksternet (talk) 19:51, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Drmies (talk) 00:49, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]