User talk:EitiltNua

Removing templates without resolving them.

Please do not do this - simply saying they do not apply without any evidence is not sufficient. In this case there are no references that confirm the start dates given. We either need to find such a reference, the ability to book a ticket from a particular date runs foul of Wikipedia's very strict consensus against Synthesis, and Original Research, or remove the start date completely either are OK by me - there is no requirement that a start date is included. In fact it is very questionable that such detail is particularly encyclopaedic. Hope that helps. Andrewgprout (talk) 04:05, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm referring your behaviour to a moderator, you are now edit warring. Please stop your disruptive editing. You seem to have a track record in this avenue with multiple users. You aren't setting policy here but seem to be indicating your own interpretations of policies? Interesting behaviour. You also referred to dummy bookings what on earth are you talking about? Two references are provided. Primary, using timetable section which shows dates for corresponding routes. Secondary, which confirmed validity of operational routes using an independent source. For future reference, provide policy not commentary on my page of your own self interpreted policies they do not exist. EitiltNua (talk) 22:21, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Shannon Airport, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Why remove sourced information when you know how to fix it? The Banner talk 08:33, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Cork Airport, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. No need to remove sources, you know that The Banner talk 13:53, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Again with your disruptive bulk undo editing. Provide sources that ORK-AGP is year round and ORK-TFS even operates. EitiltNua (talk) 16:35, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nice try, but you were the one removing valid sources. Why are you so afraid of sources? The Banner talk 17:13, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cork Airport. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Again needless removal of valid sources The Banner talk 17:12, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In addition to random waffle commentary from you, see latest update. 'Extending route in to winter is not year-round', the route started as Summer seasonal, seriously do you need your hand held for edits? Utterly bizarre behaviour and bordering on unstable, clear obsession with my edits for everyone to see and completely contradictory in nature. For ORK-AGP/TFS edits, provide a source to stand over your charge that AGP is year-round and that TFS is still operational.'Why are you so afraid of sources' ;) EitiltNua (talk) 23:43, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am the one asking for sources, you remove source request, remove sources or provide sources that not back up the claim. The Banner talk 09:13, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Orio al Serio International Airport, you may be blocked from editing. Please use proper sources. Your source is not backing up your claim, "extending into the winter" is not the same as "year round". And please, stay civil. Personal attacks do not help. The Banner talk 08:58, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove maintenance templates without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Málaga Airport, you may be blocked from editing. You better provide sources for you claim instead of removing valid source requests. The Banner talk 09:08, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Málaga Airport. The Banner talk 16:13, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

I have filed a sockpuppet investigation against you here, as I do not think that you are a genuine user. The Banner talk 16:54, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Jack1985IE per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jack1985IE. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Girth Summit _(blether) 20:19, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is an unfortunate turn of events. It took us a while to detect this account, but now that we have, that will make it more difficult for you to resume editing here legitimately. If you want to edit here, you should read WP:SO, refrain from editing for six months, and then make an unblock request acknowledging past mistakes and undertaking not to repeat them. Best Girth Summit _(blether) 20:25, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, I had him on my radar since Februari but then real life (house move) interfered. The Banner talk 21:39, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How about fuck off, such sad people its a wonder this bullshit website isn't taken seriously. Delete my account