User talk:Eiorgiomugini/Archive 1

Hello, welcome to Wikipedia. Here's some tips:

You can introduce yourself on the new users page
If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username.
You can sign your name using three tildes, like ~~~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too.
Remember to use the show preview button before you save a page.
If you have any questions, see the help pages, or add a question to the village pump.

Other useful pages are: how to edit, how to write a great article, naming conventions, manual of style and the Wikipedia policies.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! PHG 08:27, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dung Huang frescoe

Hi Eiorgiomugini. Thank you for your discussions on the Yuezhi Talk Page. Although I do not agree with some of your conclusions, the discussion finally helped bring new material to the article. May I ask for your help on something? As you seem to be conversant in ancient Chinese, would you be able to give a transliteration and translation of the short text on the following Dung Huang frescoe: Image:HanWudiBuddhas.jpg? Regards. PHG 08:20, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, sorry, I could only see wording of 甘泉�?and 得二金人, maybe you should asked someone else with a better eyes. Eiorgiomugini

For what it's worth, I can't even make those out. :-) --Nlu (talk) 19:09, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Zhizhi

Hi,

The "Battle of Zhizhi" is a little confusing, as it makes it unclear whether Zhizhi is a person (which I assume is the case) or a place. Since in English "Battle of X" usually implies that the battle happened at place X, it might help to clarify. Or, is Zhizhi actually a place name? Note that "fortress of Zhizhi" sounds like a fortress named "Zhizhi", while "Zhizhi's fortress" would make it more clear that Zhizhi is a person who owned it. Qaramazov 09:42, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Its a name of place and fortress, named after Zhizhi. Eiorgiomugini

Geng Kui

Please see talk:Geng Kui for a worry about a claim in this article. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 19:10, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mediation Cabal

Hello, I am a mediator from the Mediation cabal. Recently user Nlu requested a mediation case on the arguments between you and him. Please visit Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-05-18 Nlu and Eiorgiomugini on Chinese history-related articles. Thank you! Olorin28 03:03, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese classic texts

Please see Talk:Chinese classic texts.
Remember to mark your edits as minor only when they genuinely are (see Wikipedia:Minor edit). "The rule of thumb is that an edit of a page that is spelling corrections, formatting, and minor rearranging of text should be flagged as a 'minor edit'."
When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 14:24, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you continue simply to revert without explanation, you may be blocked from editing. The same applies to removing the {{copyedit}} template without doing the required work. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 15:47, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I told you is a tidy up job, I don't sees why you kept on reverting my version, is there any problems with it??? The {{copyedit}} is not needed to that two articles, I don't know what kind of required work are you asking, why don't you do it for your own instead inserting {{copyedit}} Eiorgiomugini 15:50, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your English is poor, and is clearly not your first language; you are in no position to declare that the "copyedit" template is unneeded. If you remove the tags again, I shall block you form editing for a short period.

As for your changes to Erya, you give no citation for your claim (as required by WP:CITE). --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 15:57, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not this rubbish again, just beacuse my English is poor doesn't meant I'm in no position to declare {{copyedit}} template is unneeded, since you can't speak Chinese does that meant you are in no position to declare any revert on China-related articles?? I'm asking you to point out which parts of the article that is needed for required work, beside you can do that yourself, so its unnecessarily to insert another {{copyedit}}. AS for Erya, that's is a work done between Qin and Han dynasties, you can check out Chinese wiki if you want it to, unfortunatly you can't read Chinese. Eiorgiomugini 16:03, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked you from editing for fifteen minutes in order to get you to calm down and think about what you're doing. When the block expires, please discuss the issues at the relevant Talk pages. If you continue merely to remove "copyedit" templates and change articles without giving citations and sources, you may be blocked for successively longer periods. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 16:02, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would declare an unblock Eiorgiomugini 16:04, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Block from Mel Etitis

Blocked me for 1 hour without reasons, request an unblock immediately, this user Mel Etitis had violated a 3RR rules Eiorgiomugini 16:38, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Jkelly 18:47, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Like I said this guy had pissed me off for over hours, and blocked me for his own purpose. Eiorgiomugini 18:49, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

He is blocked too for WP:3RR. 请您不要太生气然后对其他的editor可亲一点�?Sasquatch' t|c 20:02, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User notice: temporary 3RR block

Regarding reversions[1] made on May 20 2006 (UTC) to Chinese classic texts

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.

The duration of the block is 24 hours. William M. Connolley 19:36, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Advice

Ciao, Eiorgiomugini, il tuo nick mi fa pensare che tu sia italiano ;) Se pensi che questi coglioni ti stiano scocciando, perché non vieni su Wiki italiana? An Italian Friend 19:42, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Various matters

Chinese classic texts; it may be that the Chinese Wikipedia has different conventions, but at the English Wikipedia the rule is that only proper names are capitalised in titles. Also, the title in the summary should match the title of the article. You tried to change the latter, and having failed, changed the former; you will see that that is unsatisfactory. If you still believe that the title should be changed, you should argue for it at the articles's Talk page.
Copy-editing. The two articles concerned (Jie (ethnic group) and Period of Disunity) are both in very poor English, and badly need to be copy-edited. The {{copyedit}} template alerts other editors to this. See Template:Drmmt for the standard warning, which makes clear that removing templates is considered to be vandalism.
Sources. I'm glad to see that you've now given a source for your change to Erya.
Wikipedia:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages). Wikipedia has clear guidelines for dab pages; in particular, such pages are not articles, and information apart from the main links should be kept to a minimum. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 08:56, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

With regard to linking of years, as Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links)#Dates and numbers makes clear: "chronological items such as simple years (for example, 1981) should be treated like any other words and linked only where they are particularly relevant to the topic." Please don't link every year.
When an article uses the BCE/CE system, editors should not change to BC/AD (and vice versa. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 17:06, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Erya

You removed three external links with the edit summary "Revert; the links can't even access". I tried the links, and all three were live. I replaced two of them (the third was to a site with no useful information). Why are you insisting on removing them? --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 10:58, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I removed three external links because I could not access one of the link and partly because the editor had not tried to remove the unuseful link, after restoring the edit. By the way can you explain what did you meant by pretences? Eiorgiomugini 17:24, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The phrase is "false pretences"; I used it because you claimed to be removing the links because they were dead, and none of them was. You now say that you couldn't access only one of them (though you used the plural in your edit summary); I don't follow the reason you give for removing the others. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 20:05, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, sorry for the typo plural then, what else can I said. Eiorgiomugini 20:23, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

3RR at Hua Mulan

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.

-- Kim van der Linde ^{at venus} 04:43, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You know the rules as you were very capable of reporting the other, so even without a warning, cool down for 24 hours. -- Kim van der Linde ^{at venus} 04:43, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, this is the first time I read his article, it is so stereotypical that I almost wanted to stop reading half way through. Eiorgiomugini 04:48, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Manual of Style (China-related articles) clearly said that to include Cantonese pronunciation, given in IPA, on pages related to Hong Kong, Macau, and possibly the Cantonese-speaking regions of Guangdong. Which is why I removed his addition and unsourced datebase from his edits on Hua Mulan. Eiorgiomugini 05:41, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've assumed good faith and unblocked, please try and stay away from revert warring, talk pages are there for a good reason. I rather avoid the block-mess and I'm sure you would too -- Tawker 05:45, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User notice: temporary 3RR block

Regarding reversions[2] made on June 20 2006 (UTC) to Turkic peoples

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.

The duration of the block is 24 hours. William M. Connolley 21:06, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Denied. This is not an excuse to break 3RR. If you think someone else has, you know exactly where to take it. --jpgordon ∇∆∇∆ 22:13, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting W-G and tone mark information

Improve pages wherever you can, and don't worry about leaving them imperfect. However, avoid deleting information wherever possible.WP:EP (Editing policy in a nutshell)

Eiorgiomugi, I'm still new at contributing to Wikipedia and hope you'll teach me how to deal with those individuals who engage in unacceptable behaviors like sabotage and bullying. Would you please answer these questions?

Why did you delete the pinyin tone marks and Wade-Giles romanization from these [3], [4], [5] rime dictionary articles? Was it related to your Shiming Talk[6] edit three minutes earlier? In what way does noting "consistency per article, and rm of wg, please do not revert it until you make your explanation" justify these deletions? Why would anyone need to explain additions that just follow the WP:MOS-ZH recommendations? I'm confused about when you'll allow me to add diacritics or romanizations. Why did you remove and proclaim "wg unneeded"[7] for the Jiyun but leave the Wade-Giles and even add tone marks for the Shiming and other dictionaries?

--Keahapana 01:42, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I can't imagine a situation "when pinyin is not available." You're correct about the MOS, and this is an obvious case for including Wade romanization because Lu Fayan WAS a famous person in Chinese literature.

Why did you leave the W-G for Liu Xi in the Shiming but remove it for Lu Fayan in the Qieyun, etc.? You still haven't answered why you added pinyin tones into the Shiming article but deleted them from others. Other than contrariness, what's the point?

--Keahapana 23:42, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You reasonably left the W-G "Liu Hsi" romanization for Liu Xi in the Shiming, the "Yang Hsiung" for Yang Xiong in the Fangyan, etc., but deleted the "Lu Fa-yen" for Lu Fayan in the Qieyun, etc. If you won't agree to follow the Chinese MOS, will you at least agree to be consistent? --Keahapana 18:49, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mediation request

Hi, I am not the official mediator, but I will try to help. Where would you like to conduct the discussion? Some possibilities are your talk page, the Mediation Case page, or the talk page of one of the articles in question. (You can reply here, I've watchlisted you.) --Ideogram 03:45, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:20041212002910723.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:20041212002910723.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BigDT 05:12, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Loulan.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Loulan.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BigDT 05:20, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Medcab and whatnot

Hi! I'm a Mediation Cabal mediator and I've looked through your mediation request. I'm afraid I couldn't follow your post very well, so can you explain what's wrong? Try to keep it short if you can. --The Prophet Wiz ard of the Cray on Cake 00:04, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ru ruan

Hi, I need some info from you regarding the above article. If possible can you contact me?--Raja 19:37, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[[Huá (�?]]

Hello, I noticed that you contributed a lot of info to the above article before it was separated from State of Hua so I think it would be good for you to have a look at it again in case you see anything that needs better clarification. All the best. Kaz 13:22, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

editing / grammar

Hi Eiogiomugini

I was reading your page on Wei Zheng (if the contents were not yours please ignore this message) and it is a very good article. The only thing I have to suggest is that you make a note for someone to proofread the English grammar of articles you write because some things had to be fixed up!

Great job though!

Regarding edits made during January 21 2007 (UTC) to Dingling

It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Dingling. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. _→AzaToth 18:32, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]