User talk:EdwardMill

May 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Yellow-throated flycatcher, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless used with permission. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:

If you still have questions, there is the teahouse, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Diannaa 🇨🇦 (talk) 12:53, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Old Bridge of Dezful has been reverted.
Your edit here to Old Bridge of Dezful was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (https://www.ancient-origins.net/ancient-places-asia/dezful-bridge-oldest-usable-bridge-world-was-built-70000-roman-prisoners-006995) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 13:54, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello EdwardMill. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:EdwardMill. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=EdwardMill|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. YODADICAE👽 12:42, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
32	Grace Hartzel (talk)	Add sources
13	Abu 'Abd al-Rahman al-Sulami (talk)	Add sources
18	Nadja Bender (talk)	Add sources
110	Google mobile services (talk)	Add sources
8	North Korea women's national volleyball team (talk)	Add sources
2,522	Dhirubhai Ambani (talk)	Add sources
47	Google Clips (talk)	Cleanup
2,147	Kubernetes (talk)	Cleanup
306	Google Video (talk)	Cleanup
537	Tensor Processing Unit (talk)	Expand
65	Bishapur (talk)	Expand
39	Virginia Museum of Transportation (talk)	Expand
458	VP9 (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
322	Criticism of Google (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
45	Google Programmable Search Engine (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
75	Goobuntu (talk)	Merge
166	.google (talk)	Merge
31,530	Google (talk)	Merge
72	Jocelyn Pook (talk)	Wikify
149	Bagha Jatin (talk)	Wikify
48	Google Image Labeler (talk)	Wikify
137	Forbes India's richest Indian by year (talk)	Orphan
34	IndiGrid (talk)	Orphan
8	Ashwajit Singh (talk)	Orphan
159	Gerrit (software) (talk)	Stub
256	Google Opinion Rewards (talk)	Stub
4	Lemon-browed flycatcher (talk)	Stub
74	Google for Education (talk)	Stub
4	White-ringed flycatcher (talk)	Stub
10	Massimo Marchiori (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:49, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jatin Ahuja

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jatin Ahuja, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jatin Ahuja. (See section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. YODADICAE👽 13:11, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Omar Al Ashi moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Omar Al Ashi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. YODADICAE👽 15:47, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Omar Al Ashi

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

EdwardMill (talk) 10:10, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All new sources included, cross-checked and verified. EdwardMill (talk) 10:10, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Omar Al Ashi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Omar Al Ashi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omar Al Ashi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

YODADICAE👽 12:39, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. EdwardMill (talk) 07:08, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Omar Al Ashi. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:01, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Grandiose Digital Media for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Grandiose Digital Media is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grandiose Digital Media until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Fram (talk) 14:17, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.Deb (talk) 09:44, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. BEACHIDICAE🌊 14:47, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop advertising.

Most of your articles are blatant advertising. Wikipedia is not the place to advertise, but you do that in articles such as Grandiose Digital Media. This needs to stop Kadermonkey (talk) 15:58, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This won't happen again. Thank you for your kind response. EdwardMill (talk) 18:21, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You had it in draft namespace, then restarted it in main namespace. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ I have moved it over to draft namespace. Please do not start that article again in main ns, nor move it over. — billinghurst sDrewth 02:23, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for being so nice and helping me out. Yes, with time to time I think everything will be fine and now I'm also reading all guidelines for Conflict of Interest and everything that needs to be learned from Wikipedia. I hope you won't get to see any more negative reports from this account in the future.

Thank you BillingHurst. EdwardMill (talk) 13:48, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Required reading and declarations

Hi. Please read Wikipedia:Paid editing and Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and then please undertake any required declarations. Thank you. — billinghurst sDrewth 02:27, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I appreciate your help. Thank you for letting me know. EdwardMill (talk) 13:43, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for undisclosed paid editing, per this discussion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | tålk 10:15, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]