User talk:Editor Londrina

Welcome!

Hello, Editor Londrina, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! RFD (talk) 16:09, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Israel Lucas Góis Monteiro

I can help you move the article, but I'm not convinced the subject meets the notability requirements. You may be better served asking over at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Brazil for someone to have a look. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 16:28, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't spam the talk page of many editors like you did. I've submitted the draft for review on your behalf. — JJMC89 (T·C) 16:48, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Again, don't spam talk pages. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:50, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

I'm sorry for that, my friend, I'm grateful to you if you can help. Editor Londrina (talk) 16:50, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Then why are you continuing to do it? —C.Fred (talk) 20:55, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Israel Lucas Góis Monteiro (January 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Paul2520 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

As per GoingBatty's comment on the talk page, this article is a good start but needs work. More references needed to establish notability and because all three citations have flags that the cited text is not in the reference given.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Israel Lucas Góis Monteiro and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Israel Lucas Góis Monteiro, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

paul2520 (talk) 18:57, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Editor Londrina, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! paul2520 (talk) 18:57, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

- TNT^❤ 00:01, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]