User talk:Eddie655321

Welcome!

Hello, Eddie655321, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! McGeddon (talk) 12:07, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Harder they Fall (Porridge)

Hello, Eddie655321. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, The Harder they Fall (Porridge), for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TheLongTone (talk) 14:01, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of No Peace for the Wicked (Porridge)

Hello, Eddie655321. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, No Peace for the Wicked (Porridge), for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TheLongTone (talk) 14:04, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Disturbing the Peace (Porridge)

Hello, Eddie655321. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Disturbing the Peace (Porridge), for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TheLongTone (talk) 14:04, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Porridge episodes

Hi Eddie. While I admire your work in creating these articles, it might have been better to work on them in your sandbox while they are being worked on so that you can bring them up to a good standard before moving them to the main namespace - otherwise, they could beat risk of deletion by those with less tolerance! In particular, adding references would be a good idea, to establish their notability - if you have any references to the reception or development of the episodes or how an episode in particular made some impact in wider culture, that would be great.

Finally, I would urge you to add an edit summary to let people know the intention of your edits, and use the Preview button so that the article history isn't simply a list of minor edits with no summary.

I add this message in good faith in the hope that you can improve your articles and the way you develop them and so they don't get further nominations for deletion. Stephenb (Talk) 07:33, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

A Storm in a Teacup (Porridge)

added a link pointing to John Moore

The Desperate Hours (Porridge)

added a link pointing to Jane Wenham

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Final Stretch (Porridge)

The article Final Stretch (Porridge) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not indicate notability, fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 21:03, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Poetic Justice (Porridge) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Poetic Justice (Porridge) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poetic Justice (Porridge) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DonaldD23 talk to me 22:33, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]