User talk:Hooniveet

Your submission at Articles for creation: Elizabeth Spann Craig (November 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Elizabeth Spann Craig and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 08:14, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Elizabeth Spann Craig

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Draft:Elizabeth Spann Craig, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.questpedia.org/en/Draft:Elizabeth%20Spann%20Craig.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 10:30, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LaMona (talk • contribs) 23:10, 1 February 2016‎ (UTC)

Conflict of interest in Wikipedia

Hi Hooniveet I work on conflict of interest issues here in Wikipedia. Your edits to date are all about Elizabeth Spann Craig which makes your account what we call a WP:SPA (please read that) I'm giving you notice of our Conflict of Interest guideline and Terms of Use (for the second time, as you were given this before), and will have some comments and requests for you below.

Hello, Hooniveet. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your circle, your organization, its competitors, projects or products;
instead propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you.

Comments and requests

Wikipedia is a widely-used reference work and managing conflict of interest is essential for ensuring the integrity of Wikipedia and retaining the public's trust in it. As in academia, COI is managed here in two steps - disclosure and a form of peer review. Please note that there is no bar to being part of the Wikipedia community if you have a conflict of interest; there are just some things we ask you to do (and if you are paid, some things you need to do).

Disclosure is the most important, and first, step. You formerly edited under an account called Ecraig21 which is a clear reference to Elizabeth Spann Craig. We have a policy against impersonating people with usernames - see WP:IMPERSONATE. It is good that you changed the account name, but would you please clarify - were you violating that policy or are you indeed the subject of the article you have worked on, or do you have some connection to her? Please note that it is no big deal - not fatal to your future life in Wikipedia - if you did violate the policy, or if you are her or have some connection to her, but we just need to clear this up so we can all go forward. Once you answer that, we can take it from there. Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 21:37, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]