User talk:E3/Online Discussion on Tunisian Wikipedia

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Csisc (talk • contribs) 13:20, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

General Guidelines

All the initial papers for discussion are in User Page
The Meeting starts at 12:30 GMT+1.
When the participant is online, he should write his full name or User Name on Participants' List
When 3 or more participants are present, the Discussion starts and all participants should be very sure they would not leave during the conversation process
While discussing, you must refresh this Discussion Page every 30 Seconds
The conversation is open even for Individuals not having Wikimedia Accounts

Participants' List

Houcemeddine Turki (Csisc)
E3

Conversation Process

12:30 - Discussion began. First, I would like to thank E3 and GeekEmad for applying to me to give my opinion about Tunisian Arabic, STUNdard, Tunisian WikiCulture and Tunisian Wikipedia. Since sTUNdard has been created, I had some critics about it as it was based on Amazigh Linguistics and on Ktbdarija only. That is why I invited to this online discussion to discuss the fact.

But, let me first introduce the logo of Tunisian Wikipedia.

I ask for your opinions about it.--Csisc (talk) 11:41, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

12:52 - I am a bit surprised about the fact that no one participates and answers to the query. If there is no one to answer by 30 minutes, I will say what I have to say and close the discussion and wait for participants tomorrow at the same time. --Csisc (talk) 11:53, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

3 February 2015 12:00

Signing into the discussion. The logo looks good. We could attach the articles and use proper capitalization so it is written as "Elmawsougħa Elħorra". I do not see a problem because the STUNdard method takes into account the Amazigh linguistic elements in Tunisian, as a matter of fact it may be an advantage. E3 (talk) 12:37, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree on changing the spelling to "Elmawsougħa Elħorra". A new version of the Wikipedia logo will appear soon.--Csisc (talk) 16:04, 3 February 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.229.251.66 (talk) [reply]

Final Overview

As the discussion was closed with only one participant, I will explain the purpose of this discussion so that it can be discussed by interested people. So, as I have said, sTUNdard 3.0 seeks of many weaknesses. So, I propose a new version here.

Furthermore, I think that sTUNdard Writing with these modifications is developed enough to have a logo. I propose this one.

All other facts could be explained only through discussion. So, I invite you to participate in a later discussion soon. You can apply for a date for doing this discussion here.

Yours Sincerely, --Csisc (talk) 13:11, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Agree on the Logo. I believe that the proper spelling of STUNdard uses a capital "S" in the beginning.

E3 (talk) 12:39, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am very happy that the STUNdard logo pleased you. So, I will adopt it for the writing of STUNdard Books and Guides as LTH had agreed the fact that I will contribute to STUNdard. --Csisc (talk) 16:14, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]