Jump to content

User talk:Dthomsen8/sandbox04

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Wikia cities

[edit]

Boston, Chicago, Los Angeles, New York City and San Francisco seem to have them. Consider starting one for your city with Wikia.--DThomsen8 (talk) 16:35, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Norwegian resistance 1

[edit]

{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= {{WikiProject Germany|class=start|importance=mid|nested=yes}} {{NorwayProject|class=start|importance=high|nested=yes}} {{WPMILHIST |class=start |German-task-force=yes |WWII-task-force=yes |Nordic-task-force=yes |nested=yes}} {{WPFC|nested=yes}} }}

Norwegian resistance 2

[edit]

{{WPMILHIST|class=Start|B-Class-1=no|B-Class-2=yes|B-Class-3=yes|B-Class-4=yes|B-Class-5=yes|Nordic=yes|WWII=yes}}

How do I comment something out? --DThomsen8 (talk) 12:56, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Answer below, but must edit to see it! --DThomsen8 (talk) 13:20, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Test sandbox 4

[edit]

Climate

[edit]
Parker
Climate chart (explanation)
J
F
M
A
M
J
J
A
S
O
N
D
 
 
0.9
 
 
67
41
 
 
0.7
 
 
73
45
 
 
0.7
 
 
79
49
 
 
0.2
 
 
87
54
 
 
0.1
 
 
95
63
 
 
0
 
 
105
71
 
 
0.3
 
 
108
78
 
 
0.6
 
 
107
78
 
 
0.6
 
 
101
71
 
 
0.3
 
 
90
59
 
 
0.3
 
 
76
47
 
 
0.6
 
 
67
41
█ Average max. and min. temperatures in °F
█ Precipitation totals in inches
Source: Weather.com / NWS
Metric conversion
J
F
M
A
M
J
J
A
S
O
N
D
 
 
22
 
 
19
5
 
 
18
 
 
23
7
 
 
17
 
 
26
9
 
 
4.3
 
 
31
12
 
 
2.3
 
 
35
17
 
 
0.5
 
 
41
22
 
 
6.9
 
 
42
26
 
 
15
 
 
42
26
 
 
14
 
 
38
22
 
 
8.1
 
 
32
15
 
 
8.4
 
 
24
8
 
 
14
 
 
19
5
█ Average max. and min. temperatures in °C
█ Precipitation totals in mm

The New York Times reported on the oral argument, saying,

Several of the court's more conservative justices reacted with incredulity to a series of answers from a government lawyer about the scope of Congressional authority to limit political speech. The lawyer, Malcolm L. Stewart, said Congress has the power to ban political books, signs and Internet videos, if they are paid for by corporations and distributed not long before an election.

[1]

Later in the story, there was this analysis,

If the court were inclined to rule narrowly for Mr. Olson's side in the case, Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, No. 08-205, it could find that the documentary is not the sort of communication covered by McCain-Feingold law. Or it could say that that the proposed distribution of the film on a cable video-on-demand service would not be covered by the law. [1]

More text goes here.

Even more text goes here. Now is the time for all good men to go to the aid of their country. The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog. Never doubt it. --DThomsen8 (talk) 23:59, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b Adam, Liptak (2009-03-25). "Justices Consider Interplay Between First Amendment and Campaign Finance Laws". The New York Times. p. 1. Retrieved 2009-05-09. Cite error: The named reference "NYT 2009-05-08" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).

US Agency - Check list.

[edit]

Added later

[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dthomsen8/sandbox04&oldid=925474471"