Jump to content

User talk:Dreuther

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

August 2019

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Gita (mobile carrier) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 13:35, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon

Hello Dreuther. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Gita (mobile carrier), but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Dreuther. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Dreuther|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Wikipedia is not meant for promotion, and does not care about the company's preferred capitalization of trademarks. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:49, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

[edit]

Stop making unblock requests. Your account is not directly blocked, as I've already told you and as can be verified by the fact that you can edit your sandboxes. Additionally, it is inappropriate to make unblock requests anywhere other than here. You are being disruptive. --Yamla (talk) 17:01, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Yamla - I did not mean to be disruptive. Being new to Wikipedia I have no idea why I can't save a draft in my sandbox. There is no SAVE button. Googling the issue resulted in the possibility of being blocked and that's what I responded to. I posted my request twice - it seemed in two different spots, once in User:Dreuther/sandbox and once in User:Dreuther/Karen Reuther/sandbox. Again, only because I am confused and don't know how to get started. Dreuther (talk) 17:07, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Dreuther. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. --Yamla (talk) 17:03, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Dreuther, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, visit the Teahouse, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! AntiDionysius (talk) 00:27, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello User:AntiDionysius. I believe my post is in DRAFT mode in my sandbox and has not yet been published as a post that is accessible outside my sandbox. Please correct me if I am wrong.

I am writing the post for my wife - no compensation - and am sure that I am creating (and capable of creating) a neutral, not biased, factual post covering her professional achievements. Is this compliant with the Wikipedia guidelines? I would love it if you would review the post once I am done in my sandbox.

PS: This is my first post and I hope I do things the wright way.

Cheers, Dreuther (talk) 01:00, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is a draft, but other people can see drafts as you work on them, and I wanted to flag the issue before you spent too long working on the draft.
Writing a post for your wife definitely constitutes a conflict of interest. I strongly advise you read the simple conflict of interest guide before proceeding. The short version is that writing about your spouse is not against the rules, but it is strongly, strongly discouraged, and you are required to be transparent about it if you do it. The problem is that everyone thinks they are unaffected by their conflict and that they can be neutral despite it - and almost all of them are wrong. These things work subconsciously, and can be hard for the person with the conflict to prevent (even if they're actively trying) or even to notice. Hence the discouragement.
As it currently stands, I'm afraid the draft you have written is quite far away from Wikipedia's standards for neutrality. Like I said, you should take a read of the conflict of interest policy, but if you are committed to moving forward on the draft anyway I'd also suggest the neutrality policy and this explanatory note on promotional language. AntiDionysius (talk) 01:06, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.
If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Yamla (talk) 10:43, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Dreuther (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was working on a post in my sandbox assuming that it would be a private post for me to see only. Only during the process I was made aware that others can see my sandbox post. There is no SAVE button to save a DRAFT, only PUBLISH. How else am I supposed to create a new post? I hope you will understand my beginner’s struggles and unblock me. I have been a supporter of Wikipedia for years and believe firmly in its principles. Dreuther (talk) 11:37, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

You still haven't addressed your violations of WP:COI. Frankly, I would not support an unblock until you do so and until you commit to refraining from editing about any subject for which you have a conflict of interest. --Yamla (talk) 11:41, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You should also be aware that while draft and sandbox pages are less visible than main space articles, they are neither invisible nor untouchable to other users. Certain kinds of content (blatant promotion, violations of copyright, and libellous material) can and will be deleted outright; being in a sandbox or draft space does not grant immunity from deletion. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 14:33, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"Publish changes" should be understood to mean "save", it does not mean "publish this to the encyclopedia". It used to say save, but was changed to emphasize that all edits are public, even to sandboxes and talk pages. 331dot (talk) 15:34, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Quoting Wikipedia: "Welcome to this sandbox page, a space to experiment with editing." Why does my editing not count as "experimenting with editing" and instead leads to being infinitively blocked? I was still in the process of editing and refining the post and wanted to have the post reviewed before officially publishing it. I created the post based on other wikipedia pages for individuals and am confident that I can avoid, or remove with the help of other Wikipedia editors, any bias or promotion based on my relationship to the person the post is featuring. Dreuther (talk) 15:45, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
At no point have you addressed your conflicts of interest, despite warnings to do so and despite this block. Near as I can tell, you have never edited about anything except conflicts of interest. All you seem to be here to do is to promote subjects for which you have a conflict. --Yamla (talk) 15:49, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I started to create a post yesterday, less than 24 hours ago, and was still in the process of editing as a newbie to Wikipedia. Since then I was kept busy with Wikipedia blocks and push backs. Like I said, I assumed I was working in a space where I could experiment with editing (per Wikipedia). I will address the conflicts of interest. I am stopping short of calling this blocking me an abuse of power! Dreuther (talk) 16:08, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well, we've waited more than five years for you to address your conflict of interest. Another day or so won't strain things too much. --Yamla (talk) 16:10, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The post I attempted 5 years ago was for the company I worked for. I no longer work for that company. I didn't know then that I was not allowed to create such a post. It was deleted right away. This was 5 years ago. Since then I didn't do a thing on Wikipedia, except donate annually to support Wikipedia's mission.
Now I am posting a profile about my wife where every details is supported by external links. There will not be any biases or personal preferences in the profile. I will request feedback before the post leaves my sandbox to make sure it complies with all of Wikipedia's guidelines. I was still in the editing process when I was indefinitely blocked.
Let's be real and not mix up something I did unknowingly 5 year ago with the present.
Dreuther (talk) 16:16, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I oppose any unblock unless it is accompanied by (1) a full disclosure, as required by WP:COI, and (2) a WP:TOPICBAN on writing about subjects for which there's a conflict of interest. --Yamla (talk) 16:17, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The draft page in your sandbox does have bias in it. The very first sentence says ...has been a designer by training and practice for over forty years, and today is a practicing activist committed to inclusion by design and ending gender bias in product design. There is more promotional language throughout the page. AntiDionysius (talk) 16:22, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you AntiDionysius. This kind of feedback is what I have been looking for. I had an updated version of the whole profile ready to post last night when I was blocked indefinitely.
I will study WP:COI and WP:TOPICBAN and hope that the administrators of Wikipedia will be kind enough to drop my block.
Dreuther (talk) 16:38, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Dreuther, I've had a look at the draft in your sandbox and I'm not seeing any truly independent sources (see WP:INDEPENDENT). If these are the most relevant sources you have, I don't think you're going to be able to get an article on your wife through review. Is there anything else you might be interested in writing about? -- asilvering (talk) 13:40, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Where can I go from here? How can I remove the current DRAFT page and start from zero? How can I get UNBLOCKED?
I do not deserve to be blocked. I created a draft page in my Sandbox which is meant for experimental purposes: Sandboxes, such as a user's sandbox or the more frequently edited Wikipedia:Sandbox, are pages designed for testing and experimenting with wiki syntax and the VisualEditor.
They were created as a place with fewer rules and policies than other pages on Wikipedia. For example, you don't have to follow the Manual of Style or reach community consensus before making a major change. However, they must not be used for malicious purposes, and policies such as no personal attacks, civility, and copyrights (such as non-free content criteria) still apply.
\Why did I get blocked indefinitively based on that? Where is the appropriateness?
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Dreuther (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did nothing inappropriate besides drafting in my sandbox. Remove the current draft and let me get a fresh start and submit my final draft for review. I will work on my draft outside of Wikipedia. Apparently the sandbox is tightly monitored. "Blocks are used to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, not to punish users (see § Purpose and goals)." When and where have I done any damage or disruption to Wikipedia? Dreuther (talk) 20:17, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

Dreuther (talk) 20:02, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COI Disclosure

[edit]

{{User:Dreuther}}

I was hoping to create a professional page for my wife Karen Korellis Reuther. The page is in no way supposed to be promotional, instead absolutely factual based on existing references from Harvard University, Purdue University, Lesley University, and other respected media and organizations. I will ask that the page be reviewed and vetted by Wikipedia editors to make sure that there is absolutely no conflict of interest. When I was blocked I was in the middle of editing the page and I was not done refining it and removing any content that might be promotional.

As an example, the first paragraph was pointed out by User:AntiDionysius. For the updated paragraph I am envisioning this: Karen Korellis Reuther (born April 26, 1957) is a designer, academic, and advocate for inclusion and gender equity in product design. She is currently a Design Critic in Architecture at Harvard University’s Graduate School of Design. Reuther has over 40 years of experience as a designer and creative executive in the sports footwear, apparel, and consumer goods industries.

I am kindly asking to remove my block so that I can finish and submit for review. I was under the assumption that my sandbox is a place where I can experiment until I submit for review and approval.

Thank you,

Dreuther (talk) 23:42, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla: Dreuther has pretty clearly stated his conflict of interest, including before he was blocked. I don't think this block is necessary. If Mr. Reuther wants to submit his draft, he should be allowed to do so. That said, @Dreuther: if you want this draft to be accepted, you will need to provide secondary sources, such as news articles written by people unaffiliated with your wife or independent scholarly reviews of her work. If those things don't exist, it's likely that your wife does not meet Wikipedia's notability guideline for people and an article for her will not be accepted when you submit the draft. voorts (talk/contributions) 02:01, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I can't see where he ever declared his conflict of interest around his edits for Gita, but assuming you are correct. My concern would be that he's never edited except in subject areas for which he has a conflict. However, I'm willing for you to unblock him if you think his goal here isn't simply to promote such subjects. --Yamla (talk) 11:04, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: the post about the gita following robot was 5 years ago and I left the company in July 2021. So actually, there is no longer a conflict of interest. Do you still want me to post a COI? Also, the post was removed right away. Where would I post such a COI? Dreuther (talk) 12:43, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
To be clear, this isn't a trick. I don't plan to lift the block at this time based on what I've seen, but don't object at all if you think it's appropriate to do so. --Yamla (talk) 11:06, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I think Mr. Reuther has been fully apprised of our COI guidelines at this point. Even if his goal is to promote his wife, he's said he's going to work on the article in his sandbox and then submit it for review. If it's rejected, it's rejected. If it's not, we've got another article about a notable woman designer/scholar. voorts (talk/contributions) 13:14, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. I removed the current article and will prepare an updated version outside of the sandbox before I submit it for review. Dreuther (talk) 14:44, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dreuther&oldid=1258948838"