User talk:Drescger

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Drescger. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Gold Crude Research, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Per this discussion. --Calton | Talk 16:41, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gold Crude Research

The article Gold Crude Research has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Twenty-four separate references -- PR, directory listings, passing mentions, blog postings, advertising, and churnalism -- and no real hint as to why this company is notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Calton | Talk 16:47, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Paid for article

The article you just created was paid for. You need to declare this per the WP:TOU. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 21:49, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the discussion here on the COI noticeboard about this article and previous history. Ravensfire (talk) 21:56, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]