A template you created, Template:Military-Rank, has been marked for deletion as a deprecated and orphaned template. If, after 14 days, there has been no objection, the template will be deleted. If you wish to object to its deletion, please list your objection here and feel free to remove the {{deprecated}} tag from the template. If you feel the deletion is appropriate, no further action is necessary. Thanks for your attention. Bryan Derksen (talk) 05:45, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Dreamy. I don't think your note on my talk page is accurate. I believe the same users are still arguing the same points. The question is whether any of the arguments have any validity. Hughsheehy (talk) 18:02, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Dreamafter. I think that you need to take a look at the conclusion of your mediation on the Birmingham Pub Bombings. The conclusion and reasons you've given are entirely unsatisfactory. I think we now need to move that discussion to a more formal review. I'm extremely disappointed that after months of patient waiting since the initial discussions you would do something like ignoring many of the contributions and moving to close the mediation within an hour, stating incorrectly that only one editor is supporting the inclusion of victim information. Hughsheehy (talk) 17:42, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
An image that you uploaded, Image:German Wolf.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. 88.73.237.64 (talk) 17:55, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Dreamafter. A work of a Bundeswehr soldier or employee, taken or made during the course of the person's official duties is not PD in Germany. From the Bundeswehr too! All Content has a copyright! --88.73.237.64 (talk) 17:55, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It's very kind of you to think of me but I've got my hands so full with Wiki stuff that I don't think I'd do justice to the mop as well :) Thank you so much for asking. --ROGER DAVIEStalk23:00, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You removed Enfield revolver from the GAN list saying you reviewed the article but the talk page still says "Enfield revolver is a current good article nominee". Can you please post your review on the talk page so we know whether you pass, fail or put on hold the article? --Kaypoh (talk) 05:44, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I have to say those are some difficult questions to answer as I really cannot think of anything specific that made me think that you should be an administrator. I would have to say that I think you would be a good administrator because you have plenty of experience here, you seem to know your may around, and you don't seem likely to cause any problems as an admin. As for things to improve, I would say that your RfA pointed some out civility problems. I have seen many RfAs receive many opposes because of incivil incidents. Another thing pointed out at your RfA was to make sure to only tag articles for speedy deletion if you are certain they apply under one of the categories. When in doubt, tag the article for WP:PROD or make an WP:AFD. Basically, note the concerns of the opposers in you RfA and make sure to fix them. As for places you are doing good work in, I think Wikipedia:Request an account is one of them. I have seen a good deal of work in there by looking at your contributions. As for your last question about nominating you on April 8, 2008, I would be glad to do so then. Sorry if I did not answer your questions completely. Please tell me on my talk page if there is anything that I need to fix in relation to the answers to your questions. Captainpanda04:04, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sure - I can email it to you, if you'd like. I'll send an email to connect. The bot is made up of several PHP classes, and I'm still working out kinks, but it's getting pretty stable and usable. I also have docs available at: [1]. Any input you have will be appreciated! -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs)23:36, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:Spinto Did I Ever Tell You.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
I'm not really an outside party on this, I've been involved in various discussions dating back to the start of the year. The other parties certainly won't accept me as an outside mediator. That said, unless Hughsheehy is willing to compromise I think further discussion is a waste of everyone's time. Thanks. One Night In Hackney30323:42, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Not only do I think that the current "mediation" is going nowhere in particular (and I'm going to continue to push for a more formal process), but even your attempt to nominate a highly partisan participant of the discussion as a mediator also damages your standing as a non-involved party. Hughsheehy (talk) 19:23, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. My ALL IN CAPITALS message (and yes, the edit ref I gave saying that I'm a fag and should be killed was a real one) was, it, seems, all too apparently a VANDIL edit. It just goes to show though that there's a positive side to WP. Thanks for looking out for attacks! Tonywalton | Talk23:32, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXI (November 2007)
The contest department has completed its eight month of competition. The leader for this month, with a massive 92 points, is Blnguyen; Woodym555 is in second place, with 32 points, and Cla68 and TomStar81 are tied for third place, with 15 points each. Overall, Blnguyen is now in first place, with 140 points, followed by JKBrooks85, with 120 points, and by Woodym555, with 63 points. All project members are encouraged to submit the articles they're working on as entries.
Tag & Assess 2007—the project's first major article tagging and assessment drive—is continuing; all project members—and anyone else who's interested—are invited to assist with this effort.
Mike Christie was awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of his outstanding work on Anglo-Saxon military history, including the production of numerous featured articles.
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.
Hi, you have left a rather unusual and cryptic GA Review on the above article. There is no in popular culture section and there is no tag on the lead, so your instructions do not seem to have any relation to the article in question. Please can you clarify this for me?--Jackyd10101:49, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Have you passed this article or not? It says so on the article talk page but the article is still at GAN and isn't on the GA mainpage. I can do all the moving around if you like, but please confirm that you have indeed passed the article. In response to you comment on my talk page, I don't think that references in the lead are encouraged except for direct quotes as long as all lead statements are covered by the rest of the text, as in this case. Regards--Jackyd10118:14, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I have a small question on my editor review. When you said "Don't self-nom for adminship, get an admin or experiecned editor to do it for you", did you mean ask them to nominate me or to wait for someone to nominate me? Thanks in advance and I look forward to hearing from you soon. STORMTRACKER9416:38, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Can you tell me what's happening now on the Birmingham mediation? I see ONIH saying he's giving up on it. I have notes from Aatomic saying that there's apparently another "Way forward" already being pursued, etc. I was assembling various points as back up for the "pro" side, but am not sure that there's a point right now. Is anything sensible happening or is it just going to be a free-for-all in editing the whole area? (an area that has already apparently worn out a bunch of admins on arbcoms, etc). Hughsheehy19:17, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Could you take all of what was written here, here, here, and here, and put them here? That would be much appreciated! Thanks in advance! <DREAMAFTER> <TALK> 00:30, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Well, you seem to have pissed off quie a few users. The best way to avoid this is, before saying something, to think about how it may be consstrued. I docked two points because your edit summaries have been interpreted as arcane. Try to make your edit summaries cearer. I would caution against abbreviations. ¿SFGiДnts!¿Complain!¿Analyze!¿Review!19:36, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks very much for participating in my RfA, which passed 71 - 4 - 3! I appreciate all the comments that were made and will do my best not to let the community down. Who could do otherwise with such a fabulous rainbow-colored mop?!?
Special thanks to <DREAMAFTER> for nominating me out of the blue.
I replied on my talk page to keep the conversation in one place. If you want to go back and forth between pages going forward, that’s ok, too. Ɛƚƈơƅƅơƚɑtalk16:06, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! I know we've not yet had the opportunity to interact, so allow me to officially say greetings! I notice you're on the BAG, and I'd like to request that you take a look at my comment here, as it doesn't seem to have been seen by anyone on the BAG yet. The bot in question has not done any edits since the 9th, but even after spending hours upon hours removing Example.jpg from mainspace areas, I've barely made a dent, and if the bot were to start up again, it would only be more difficult to repair all the affected pages. I apologize for coming to you out of the blue with this, I did discuss it with Cobi, who agreed with my suggestion for the change (as explained in the link), so I look forward to your opinions. Thank you! Ariel♥Gold07:48, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You have won the 2007 Wikipedia World Cup. You are entitled to diplay an image of the WikiCup on your userpage [[Image:WikiCup (en-wiki original).png|thumb|{{BASEPAGENAME}} is the current holder of the [[User:F9T/WikiCup|WikiWorldCup]]]]. Congratulations! F9T22:30, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Congratulations! You have won the WikiCup, your user has been automatically put foward, as the same country, to defend your title.
Okay, here's why I needed that stuff. See, I thought making custom signatures would be a lot easier if the users filled out a nowikied template and then deleted the nowiki tags to get their sigs. Say I had another request (which I never will). The template would be mapped out like this:
I have declined the offer. I think it is too early, and also to be honest, its not something that interests me anymore. F9T14:54, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
As well as the Trophy, you are awarded the Well done on your triumph, (again lol) Also, I would enjoy Admin Coaching. Someone did it before, but never got round to it. F9T19:54, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
And a very merry christmas to you, and indeed a very happy new year. And dont take the edit summary the wrong way, my finger slipped it was meant to say add, anyway merry christmas.Sunderland0619:35, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Do you know on your signature request page, could yu forward some of them on to me, because i'm trying to practice for signature creator on the ChampionMart. Thanks. Sunderland0620:54, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
But, do you not think that we should have some sort of distinction from the User page and talk page, possibly by change of colour, | sign, or some other sort of break.
But do you think that y attempt was good or not, if it wasn't just say so, i don't mind critiscism.Sunderland0621:18, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, so are you forwardng that one to him, and will you please give me about 1 in 2 requests to get my experience up,Thanks. Oh and do you think that i would be a good signature maker. Thanks again. Sunderland0621:22, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for voting in my RfA, which closed successfully with 44 support, 4 oppose, and 3 neutral. I will work hard to improve the encyclopedia with my new editing tools (and don't worry, I'll be careful).
That's good but can you make the letters block letters? I won't be on for a while so I if you respond and I don't reply right away don't assume I don't like it or something. --AtTheAbyss (talk) 19:10, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
In response to the question "Why should it have colons in it" which you left as an edit summary when removing the colons from Template:RMlink(edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs), the answer is that due to technical restrictions, an invisible character (a colon) is needed to link to pages in certain namespaces. The colon does not affect links to other namespaces, so is harmless. For example, [[Image:Smiley.svg|20px]] (no colon) will produce , whereas [[:Image:Smiley.svg|20px]] (with colon) will produce a link: 20px. Where ir doesn't matter, for example in the mainspace, there is no difference: [[Wikipedia]] and [[:Wikipedia]] both produce the same thing - Wikipedia and Wikipedia. I hope this explains why colons are used in the template. --GW_SimulationsUser Page | Talk01:06, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Dreamafter. Your help at WP:RM is sorely appreciated; however, please see the note at the top of the page stating that proposals placed under the "other proposals" section (i.e., controversial proposals) are to have 5 days worth of discussion before any move is performed. Please do not let this detract from you continuing to help out at the page. The Evil Spartan (talk) 16:58, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I haven't forgotten your kind offer to co-nominate me for adminship right around this time, but as I suspected when you left your note last month, I'm just not at a stage right now where I can devote time to (a) an RFA, and (b) a few tasks I'd like to complete before I try again. Probably late January or February, but can't be sure. I really want all my i's dotted and t's crossed before I try again, and want to be as ready as I can possibly be this time around; I have no desire for there to be a Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Barneca 3. When I think I'm ready, I'll let you know. And thanks again. --barneca (talk) 22:28, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think I got back to you yet, but if you could still give me said admin coaching, I would appreciate it. // F9T22:30, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Heuschrecke 10 turret off.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Heuschrecke 10 turret off.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
Thanks for uploading Image:Heuschrecke 10 launcher.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
Thanks for uploading Image:Heuschrecke 10 rear view.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
Thanks for uploading Image:Heuschrecke 10 turret half-off.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
Thanks for uploading Image:Alkett and Rhinemetall-Borsig's Heuschrecke 10.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
Please do not remove the deletion flags from these images. Even if the proper non-fair use rationale and license tags are added, they are not relevant unless you have been given permission by the images’ authors to so use them. Simply put, you cannot take images from other websites and just throw tags onto them. We can bring this to the attention of a sysop if needed, but further removal of the warnings will be considered vandalism unless proof is provided that the authors have released the images. Ɛƚƈơƅƅơƚɑtalk19:37, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for getting back to me on this. I'm not trying to cause trouble, I just want to ensure that we're staying on the right side of the law. Ɛƚƈơƅƅơƚɑtalk19:43, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You don't need to send the permission emails to me, I believe you. Just follow the steps on WP:COPYREQ and send the permissions to "permissions-en AT wikimedia DOT org" and tag the images accordingly. Ɛƚƈơƅƅơƚɑtalk20:23, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm Actually from the city of Gatineau, but it is the biggest suburb of Ottawa and directly facing much of the city as well including both downtowns facing each other.--JForget02:44, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oh I wasn't aware that you were from the region (no userboxes of either the WikiProject, the city of Ottawa or Gatineau) And thanks for that barnstar as well.--JForget02:54, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Dreamafter, on behalf of my snow-buried Canadian region of Ottawa, I would like to wish you a Safe and Happy New Year 2008. JForget02:44, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Firstly, let me wish you a very happy New Year and thank you for all your help in the Milhist Tag & Assess 2007 drive.
Secondly, although the Tag & Assess 2007 drive is now officially closed, you are very welcome to continue tagging and assessing until 31 January 2008. Any extra articles you tag and assess during this time will be credited fully to your tagging tally for further award purposes.
Thirdly, if you can find the time, it would be great to have your feedback/comments and participation in the recently-set-up Tag & Assess workshop The idea is to see what lessons we can learn from the 2007 drive to make the 2008 one more efficient and enjoyable.
Sorry. I created a Syrian Arabian article, about horses, and there seems to already be a 'Syrian(Horse)' article about the Syrian Arabian. Should we merge/combine/whatever you call it?
Now I can't find it. Sorry. Well, you can just forget it now. I suspected there was two similar articles, and finally got to checking up on it....now its gone.
The contest department has completed its ninth month of competition. The top scorer this month is Blnguyen, with 22 points, followed by Dreamafter, with 8 points, and Redmarkviolinist, with 6 points. Blnguyen also remains the overall leader, with 162 points in total. All project members are encouraged to submit the articles they're working on as entries.
Blnguyen has been awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of his efforts in improving the quality of articles related to Vietnamese military history, including the creation of numerous A-Class articles.
Woodym555 has been awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of his outstanding work on topics related to the Victoria Cross, notably including the creation of featured articles, featured lists, and a featured topic.
Although the drive is officially closed, existing participants can continue tagging until January 31 if they wish, with the extra tags counting towards their tally for barnstar purposes.
We'd like to see what lessons can be learned from this drive, so we've set up a feedback workshop. Comments and feedback from participants and non-particpants
alike are very welcome and appreciated.
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.
In order to mark a page as patrolled, you first have to go to Special:Newpages. From there, you click on a recently created article, and if the article is listed for deletion (via prod, speedy, or AFD), or if you feel that the article should remain on Wikipedia, you click the "Mark page as patrolled" link at the bottom of the page. That way no one is wasting time looking at an article that already has been looked at. Hope that helps! Icestorm815 (talk) 21:59, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I hereby award you this Tireless Contributor award for you continued efforts to improve so many different types of articles! Dreadstar†06:46, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Dreamafter, Thank you for voting in and co-nominating my RfA, which closed successfully with 34 support, 2 oppose, and 0 neutral. Thanks especially for the co-nomination - I really appreciate your extra support! I promise I will wield the mop wisely, and do my best to improve Wikipedia. -- AKeen (talk) 15:10, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I am willing to nominate you whenever you wish. I may actually start working on the nomination tonight as it will likely take some time to do. (I have not nominated someone for adminship before.) However, are you certain that you can show in the RfA that you have dealt with the concerns of the opposers? I am not saying that you have not dealt with the concerns, but I am saying that some people may not be convinced that you have. In addition, I would like to ask you about you position in WP:BAG. From what I have seen, you do not have any experience in running bots or computer programming. My apologies if I am incorrect, but I think that would be a judgment concern to participants in your RfA if you are a member of BAG with little or no bot experience. Can you please clarify this matter to me? Thank you in advance. :) Sorry if that sounded like I was accusing you. I just think that it is better that I point out these concerns to you rather than opposers in your RfA. :) Captainpanda23:12, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm confused. Why was the original version of your second RfA deleted? Just so you know, I do intend to bring up the fact that you have already tried to run a second time if you do not disclose it. GlassCobra17:50, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have moved the material to the subpage that you specified. I included everything that was said, including votes, and would ask that you make no modifications to it so that everything is visible to all participants. GlassCobra21:29, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Greetings from the Artemis Fowl Project. Your name is listed on our participants page, but we are unsure of how many of the people listed there are still active contributors to the Project's activities. If you are still interested in participating in the work of the Project, please add your name to the active list. Once you have done that, you might want to familiarise yourself with the current work. On behalf of the Project, if you do consider yourself to have left, I hope you will consider rejoining; if you consider yourself inactive, I hope you will consider returning to respond to just one request per week, or as many as you can manage. Happy editing, The Artemis Fowl Project Coordinators'.
Hi Dreamafter. I have delivered the releases that you requested my owner to deliver on behalf of WP:FOWL. Thank you and do not hesitate to contact E, my owner, if there is any problems. You can request scheduled deliveries by me at User:ENewsBot/Requests. ENewsBot01:17, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The M1 carbine article is currently on lock down. An administrator has requested some discussion from memeber of the Firearms Wikiproject. Can you take a look? Sf46 (talk) 19:08, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The contest department has completed its ninth month of competition. The top scorer this month is Blnguyen, with 22 points, followed by Dreamafter, with 8 points, and Redmarkviolinist, with 6 points. Blnguyen also remains the overall leader, with 162 points in total. All project members are encouraged to submit the articles they're working on as entries.
Blnguyen has been awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of his efforts in improving the quality of articles related to Vietnamese military history, including the creation of numerous A-Class articles.
Woodym555 has been awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of his outstanding work on topics related to the Victoria Cross, notably including the creation of featured articles, featured lists, and a featured topic.
Although the drive is officially closed, existing participants can continue tagging until January 31 if they wish, with the extra tags counting towards their tally for barnstar purposes.
We'd like to see what lessons can be learned from this drive, so we've set up a feedback workshop. Comments and feedback from participants and non-participants
alike are very welcome and appreciated.
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.
The link to the cadet wikia is back. There is a bit of an edit war going on over at the site (ie the sysop versus the rest of the world). The guy who posted the link isn't above finding out personal info on you and posting it on the net. He also creates multiple accounts to reinforce his positions.
You don't know me, but I was sent to you by another user named Blow of Light. He actually kind of welcomed me to this website and offered me to help me creating a new design for a signature. The one he created for me looks really neat in my opinion: AmandaT/C He told me to add this text into my preferences, but when I saved it like this it was all messed up for some reason. He told me you would be able to help me, so that's kind of why I'm here... to ask you if you would be so kind to help me and him :) Thanks, AmandaPirato (talk) 05:05, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I am sorry to inform you that I have closed your RfA as unsuccessful. Do not be too disheartened - many of our finest admins had unsuccessful RfA attempts. I hope you will take onboard the concerns raised by those opposing and will consider running again in the future when you feel you have addressed those concerns. Best wishes, WjBscribe02:22, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
OK thanks for both replys, for the WikiCup, you need to add your name on the team list at the bottom of the WikiCup page // F9T17:39, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is because Aatomic dosen't like that fact that the mediation was reopened, as many weren't aware of it and others where too busy being involved with the Troubles arbcom at the time. When it was reopened Aatomic couldn't provide a reason too justify the lists of the dead and continued edit warring over a number of articles, this resulted in the mediation being closed as he was ignoring it and seem intent on continuing no-matter what the outcome was. He was later put one revert probation as per the Troubles arbcom, and recently started edit warring again on this issue which earned him another probation period.--Padraig (talk) 21:12, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
...for your support in my recently closed Request for Adminship. I am more than a bit stunned by the outcome, which appears to have finished at 146 supports, no opposes, and one abstention. I am particularly grateful to Keilana and Kingboyk for their recent encouragement, and most specifically to Pastordavid, for having seen fit to nominate me. I also want to make it very clear to everyone that I have no intentions of changing my name again, so the servers should be safe for a while.
In the event you ever believe that I would ever able to assist in the future, I would be honored if you were to contact me regarding the matter. I can't guarantee results, unfortunately, but I will do what I can. Thank you again.
By the way, I know the image isn't necessarily appropriate, but I am rather fond of it, and it at least reflects the degree of honor I feel at the result. And it's hard to go wrong with a Picture of the Year candidate.
Now, off to a few last tasks before starting work in earnest on the various templates I promised I'd work on.
This RfA thanks inspired by Kathryn McDinaha's, in turn inspired by several others after Phaedriels' original. Hoping we can all keep such inspiration of newcomers ongoing, I am, sincerely, John Carter (talk).
Greetings from the Artemis Fowl Project. Your name is listed on our participants page, but we continue to be unsure of how many of the people listed there are still active contributors to the Project's activities. If you are still interested in participating in the work of the Project, please add your name to the active list. Once you have done that, you might want to familiarize yourself with the current work. On behalf of the Project, if you do consider yourself to have left, I hope you will consider rejoining; if you have left, then you will have been gone for at least two months, so your name will be removed from the list, and the list will become a single list of only active editors. If you decide to return, please comment on the talk page. Happy editing, The Artemis Fowl Project Coordinators'.
Hello, Dreamafter/Archive3! Your username, as well as the usernames of other members of Wikipedia: WikiProject Lemony Snicket, has been moved to the inactive members list, as part of a process for making the wikiproject active once again. If you would like to continue to be an active member, please follow the instructions on the top of the participants page to add your name to the active participants list.
Can you explain on what basis you transcluded the RfA of a new user weeks after it had been created? Have you had contact with this person in the intervening time? I have removed it pending its expansion/reformatting or some expression by the candidate that he/she wishes it to proceed. Avruchtalk00:38, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Dreamafter, I don't see the point of having Coordinators. I can't find a single project with them. Most decisions are reached by WP:CON anyway, so overuling a particular person is not per wikipedia's policy. --Hanaichi02:26, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oh yes, I just read it. But however, the particular coordinators there aren't exactly given extra powers like overuling decisions are they? I know you are a responsible user, but those who might be swayed by WP:ILIKEIT can make disasterous decisions resulting in numerous fancruft articles and who knows what.--Hanaichi04:14, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It's from back when putting colored letter links in one's signature was popular; this particular one had:
__NOEDITSECTION__ __NOTOC__
<center>
{| style="width: 450px; border: 1px solid gray; margin-bottom: 0.5em; background: gainsboro; text-align: left; "
| <h3 style="padding: 5px; background: lightsteelblue">[[Image:Crystal important.png|25px]] You clicked my red ''<font color="#960018">h</font>''!</h3>
|-
| style="padding: 3px; text-align: center;" | The red ''<font color="#960018">'''h'''</font>'' in my signature means that I'm a member of the '''[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history|Military history WikiProject]]''', an association of [[Wikipedia:Wikipedians|Wikipedians]] dedicated to improving Wikipedia's articles on military history.
|-
| <h3 style="padding: 5px; background: lightsteelblue;">[[Image:Exquisite-Modem.png|25px]] Did you want to [[User talk:Kirill Lokshin|talk to me]]?</h3>
|-
| <h3 style="padding: 5px; background: lightsteelblue;">[[Image:Crystal Clear action run.png|25px]] ...or see my [[Special:Contributions/Kirill Lokshin|edits within Wikipedia]]?</h3>
|-
| <h3 style="padding: 5px; background: lightsteelblue; ">[[Image:Exquisite-shellscript.png|25px]] Perhaps you wanted to know more [[User:Kirill Lokshin|about me]]?</h3>
|-
| <h3 style="padding: 5px; background: lightsteelblue;">[[Image:Waricon.png|25px]] ...or more about [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history|the project]]?</h3>
|}
</center>
Hey there, I'm writing to inform you that I have withdrawn my request for adminship, which was currently standing at 11 supports, 22 opposes and 6 neutrals. This count could have been so much better if I had understood policy, although I believe that 17 questions is a lot to ask of a user's first RfA. I will take on all comments given at the RfA and will endeavour to meet the high expectations of the RfA voters. WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDENplay it cool.21:07, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Dreamafter/Archive3, thank you for showing your support in my RFA which passed with 38 support, 0 oppose, and 0 neutral! I also want to give special thanks to my Admin Coach and nominator, Useight for all of his help and support. I promise that I'll give my best effort as an admin, and I hope that your confidence in me proves to be justified. If I can ever be of any help, please let me know. In the mean time, I have some cleaning to do.
The bug is already logged and fixed [3](but not in the binaries, and I don't build my own AWB at the moment). RichFarmbrough, 13:12 6 January2008 (GMT).
, see Talk:Wolf Armoured Vehicle for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of said article. If you oppose this decision, you may ask for a reassessment. — Rudget Contributions 16:32, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
cf38 talk 10:05, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
.png){kind=small}
, whereas [[:Image:Smiley.svg|20px]] (with colon) will produce a link: 20px. Where ir doesn't matter, for example in the mainspace, there is no difference: [[Wikipedia]] and [[:Wikipedia]] both produce the same thing - Wikipedia and Wikipedia. I hope this explains why colons are used in the template. --GW_SimulationsUser Page | Talk 01:06, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
