User talk:DrJekilMrHyDe

October 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Das (surname) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Das (surname) was changed by DrJekilMrHyDe (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.861204 on 2015-10-28T23:48:24+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:48, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Das (surname). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 00:49, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On Das (surname)

Hey there. If you take another surname, say Smith or Hopkins, the article gives a brief summary of where the surname originates and then a list of notable people associated with that name. Your changes to Das seem to put way too much information into the summary of the surname while removing notable people with the surname (these notable people have pages that have passed the WP:NOTABILITY guideline). Perhaps you could greatly cut down the amount of content in your revision and put it into the lead section of the article? I hope you can see where this is coming from, thanks. NottNott talk|contrib 13:39, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

Your recent editing history at Das (surname) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. NottNott talk|contrib 15:10, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:DrJekilMrHyDe reported by User:NottNott (Result: ). Thank you. NottNott talk|contrib 15:15, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello DrJekilMrHyDe. It appears you have broken the WP:3RR rule at Das (surname). If you respond immediately and promise to stop edit warring you might be able to avoid a block. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 15:20, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Das (surname). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 16:35, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]