User talk:Donal P McDonald

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lorna McDonald (historian) (January 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Param Mudgal was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lorna McDonald (historian) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Param Mudgal ^talk? 08:28, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Donal P McDonald, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Param Mudgal ^talk? 08:28, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My head is spinning with all the directives, but have made an attempt to meet the suggested changes needed for this article to be published, Please let me know how I have gone. Donal P McDonald (talk) 11:51, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Lorna McDonald (historian) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Lorna McDonald (historian), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Lorna McDonald (historian)

Hello, Donal P McDonald. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Lorna McDonald".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13. An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 12:00, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Donal P McDonald. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:40, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I happened to see this article. She is almost certainly notable because of the Order of Australia, but the article must have references providing substantial coverage from third-party independent reliable sources, not press releases or mere announcements.Newspaper articles and book reviews are what's wanted. I started you off by changing the books format to our usual, and removing material we do not include, but now it's up to you to find and add the material. Make certain none of it is copied from any other publication. DGG ( talk ) 17:37, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]