User talk:Jbg28

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:DeskUNPDF screenshot.png. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Deskunpdf screenshot.png. The copy called Image:Deskunpdf screenshot.png has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and remember exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 17:17, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

April 2007

This is your only warning. The next time you insert a spam link, as you did to Docudesk PDF Converter Software, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Spammers may have their websites blacklisted as well, preventing their websites from appearing on Wikipedia and other sites that use the MediaWiki spam blacklist at all. MER-C 12:19, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My concern about your username

Docudesk PDF Converter Software http://spam.docudesk.com

Hello, Docudesk, and welcome to Wikipedia.

I hope not to seem unfriendly or make you feel unwelcome, but I noticed your username, and am concerned that it might not meet Wikipedia's username policy. After you look over that policy, could we discuss that concern here?

Usernames that promote a company, Usernames that contain a domain or imply a web address are not allowed

I'd appreciate learning your own views, for instance, your reasons for wanting this particular name.

You have several options freely available to you:

If you can relieve my concern through discussing it here, I can stop worrying about it.
If the two of us can't agree here, we can ask for help through Wikipedia's dispute resolution process, such as asking for a "third opinion", or requesting comments from other Wikipedians. Wikipedia administrators usually abide by agreements reached through this process.
You can keep your contributions history under a new username. Visit Wikipedia:Changing username and follow the guidelines there.

Let me reassure you that my writing here means I don't think your username is grossly, blatantly, or obviously inappropriate; such names get reported straight to Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism or blocked on sight. This is more a case where opinions might differ, and it would be good to reach some consensus — either here or at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User names. So I look forward to a friendly discussion, and to enjoying your continued participation on Wikipedia. Thank you again!--Hu12 19:43, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of DocQ

The article DocQ has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Promotional article for non-notable software.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. andy (talk) 21:59, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]