User talk:Dismas/archive6

Jenna Jameson

WHY DID YOU REMOVE MY INFORMATION FROM THE BIO ON JENNA JAMESON WHEN THIS INFORMATION IS AVIABLE ON TMZ.COM AND IS 100% ACCURATE —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kams187 (talk • contribs) 23:06, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Getfuzzy 2007-4-20.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Getfuzzy 2007-4-20.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:26, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

C

Gah, you're an experienced user, perhaps you can answer this for me. What's with all these questions that have suddenly started piling up at the bottom of the C article? I see you left one of your own, but at least you reverted it... what link did you follow to get there? There has been hardly any activity on the article and now a load of newbie questions everywhere; very confusing – Gurch 13:41, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, I found it. Now to find the git responsible... er, sorry for invading your talk page :) – Gurch 13:43, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help

I got my 'Simon Longmore' page up ok, and I managed to link the picture, thanks to the 'red link' you provided. I tried to do the same for the school article I was posting, but I keep getting the runaround in all the articles - trying to get back to the template (similar to this page...) argh So, could you possibly give me a link like that again? Probably a trivial problem for you :) Thanks so much again for your help!! take care —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chrissybug66 (talk • contribs) 19:01, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Wee hairy beasties.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Wee hairy beasties.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 21:21, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pink Floyd album covers

Album covers were discussed here: Talk:Pink Floyd#Missing_images.2Faudio.3F. / edg ☺ ★ 23:28, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Kevin white statue.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Kevin white statue.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:57, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

==Thanks for your help, Dismas, fixing my posted image to Brian Cherney article. Cheers. Stingdin (talk) 15:25, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

HTML keys thanks

Thanks for your help in Reference: Computers. Those keys worked great. Julia Rossi (talk) 21:58, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A small thank you

Just want to let you know that one of the articles that you have defended/contributed in the past, Karen McDougal, has achieved Good Article standing. Thank you for your contribution! 76.199.65.126 (talk) 21:42, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Darva Conger

An article that you have been involved in editing, Darva Conger, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darva Conger. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 02:59, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Cormorant aircraft.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Cormorant aircraft.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:28, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Cormorantextra.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Cormorantextra.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:28, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Cormorantextra2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Cormorantextra2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:29, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CoCo

CoCo, stage name of Nicole Austin, American swimsuit model and wife of rapper Ice T. I'm surprised she doesn't have a Wiki page. :| Irk _{Come in for a drink!} 05:49, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Awalkintheclouds.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Awalkintheclouds.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Quentin X (talk) 11:43, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Reverence 1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Reverence 1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:22, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Reverence 2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Reverence 2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:23, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Slaveship starwars.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Slaveship starwars.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:31, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Staun internal beadlock1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Staun internal beadlock1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:25, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Staun internal beadlock2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Staun internal beadlock2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:25, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

re:Jenna Haze

Thanks! VanTucky 03:28, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Abusive ranting by a user

The 404 was a mistake so I fixed it, sorry I am new to this. HOWEVER, Why dont you read the article before you take it off? It is completely relevant and your suppression of information needs strikes me as very fascist. So unless we are in Europe in the 1930s, can you please get your head out of your ass and look at the article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gonnabustamove (talk • contribs) 20:45, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Kevin_mike_studio.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Kevin_mike_studio.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 16:05, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ha!

May I use your “This user suspects that George W. Bush may be a sock puppet.” box on my user page? It’s one of the funniest things I’ve seen on Wikipedia! --S.dedalus (talk) 23:52, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Tread lightly logo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Tread lightly logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:19, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you (dancers)

I would like to thank you for your helpful comments in response to my question. You invited me to ask a few questions myself about dancers per your experience. What is dating a dancer like? What is it about this "lifestyle" that you speak of, furthermore? Thank you. I am eagerly awaiting your response. Discharging P (talk) 18:35, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! The main three areas I worry about is 1) will my girl start using a lot of illicit substances (like cocaine) and 2) will she become much more promiscuous or turn to outright prostitution? 3) will she make friends with really degenerate strippers that will encourage her to become a total slut? Discharging P (talk) 19:09, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I actually don't care

But Amy McCarthy is a bit more notable than just any bum on the street. But really, an old RfD isn't really worth much considering I put a smidgen of time in this silly article. If you really don't think it belongs, let's not have a ridiculous redirect to her sister. My background is more medical and science articles anyways. I can't even believe I'm defending this. I'm going to get solidly drunk on some expensive scotch. OrangeMarlin ^{Talk• Contributions} 19:21, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:BACON bw2.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:BACON bw2.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 02:33, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Avengingangelo.jpg

I have tagged Image:Avengingangelo.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 00:50, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Turbulencefilm.jpg

I have tagged Image:Turbulencefilm.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 00:53, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Shortcuts.jpg

I have tagged Image:Shortcuts.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 00:58, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Empire_Records.jpg

I have tagged Image:Empire_Records.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 00:59, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Honeymoon_in_Vegas.jpg

I have tagged Image:Honeymoon_in_Vegas.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 01:33, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Libertarian Party

I notice from your userbox you are a libertarian. Nice to meet one on here. I usually deal with people that hold completely opposite views of my own, including today where I mentioned that a 7-year prison sentence for hate speech is dangerous and limits free speech...others disagreed. Have you checked out the libertarian-related articles found here? It would be nice to get a 2nd opinion on some of the articles. Take care. AgnosticPreachersKid (talk) 10:10, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pocket Watch

Glad to see another person who wears a pocket watch in this day and age. There are really some things that should have never phased out, and this is one of them. In case you were wondering what inspired this random post, I was wading through the archives and came across this:[[1]]. Chris16447 (talk) 19:46, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jana Miartušová

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Jana Miartušová, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 01:01, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kobe Tai

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Kobe Tai, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 01:02, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

References

I am having a hard time trying to edit an article. I am new at this. I made the change and I am trying to reference it. I do the ref-ref thing and it shows the indication number for a footnote, but how do I get the information to show up in the References section? It doesn't. There was no reference section to begin with so I typed one in. Is there some special secret procedure to establish a reference section? If there is a reference section would my info have automatically shown up? I have all this info with references but I am very frustrated trying to get it in.74.77.233.160 (talk) 18:31, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you're referring to the Paul Gottlieb Nipkow article that you've made edits to, check the references section now. I've made a change to it. Just keep adding references to the article and the references will now automatically show up in the proper section. Dismas|^(talk) 18:38, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kudos on the chickens!

I just want to express my admiration and envy at your raising of chickens! That's something I aspire to do. Marco polo (talk) 16:13, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AJ Alexander

Regarding your question about whether I took info from Elite Bunnies or the other way around, as I was not aware of Elite Bunnies until the moment I read your inquiry, the answer is the latter. Not very kosher without credit, if you ask me.--3finger (talk) 21:41, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On a slighty different topic, I brought in the modelobserver.com interview into the article itself as part of the inline reference. Also restructured it to mirror typical WP:BLP format. See if that would work for you! Mineros (talk) 19:54, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

vandalism of pages is prohibited if you continue to do so I will report you

User, dismas, has vandalized article hannah cornett with wrong birthdate, wrong birth place, has removed vital information, and requested deletion. This page has been available and updated for four years on wikipedia as the content has progressed and upgraded on the celebrity. If dismas user continues to violate the policies of the page he/she will be reported and or legal action will be brought against this user. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.192.101.98 (talk) 16:05, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please, go ahead and report me. I believe the pages you want are WP:AIV and WP:ANI. Dismas|^(talk) 21:34, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Jordan (Katie Price). Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -MBK₀₀₄ 18:21, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Emilio Estevez. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. IndulgentReader (talk) 06:28, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Userboxes

How do you get the userboxes on your page? I'd like to have them, but I'm not familiar with the coding on this site. --Dragonman.EXE 14:26, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Sentient Puddle

Thank you for your response to my question on the misc. section of the Reference Desk. BeefJeaunt (talk) 16:17, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]