User talk:Dismas/archive14

Review updated article please?

Could you please review article for me? Aliceako (talk) 21:10, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Commons image

Hello, Here is something you left me a couple years ago:

"Thank you for adding a photo of Lorrie Menconi! So many of the Playmate articles need photos, so it's good to see them added. I would like to point out that you can upload images to Wikimedia Commons for use on all Wikipedias and not just the English version. Thanks again, Dismas|(talk) 04:55, 6 January 2009 (UTC)"

Since then that and a number of my pictures have been deleted despite clearly identifying them as my copyright and following whatever procedure I found to make the "common".

I have been having issues with my content being deleted and I am being asked to edit a page for the page owner as she can't, and don't want to have yet another issue with deletion.

I haven't figured out how to "bullet proof" my entries such that someone else doesn't come along and delete them for some nefarious reason.

Help please!

Vividere (talk) 00:03, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jill Kelly

Hello why were the ref links removed? --Shylocksboy (talk) 08:59, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is a discussion at the conflict of interest noticeboard that you may be interested in, please see here for the discussion. You are welcome to participate, thank you. -- Atama頭 17:30, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Animalcrackers lg.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Animalcrackers lg.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 16:50, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Facts

Don't take undeniable facts out of Wikipedia. You are wasting your time, as they are all over the web. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.97.194.200 (talk) 13:47, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What are you talking about? Dismas|^(talk) 13:49, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits of 13.01 and 13.45 GMT today. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.97.194.200 (talk) 13:56, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not going to follow a trail of crumbs. Be specific and spell out your arguments or drop this. Dismas|^(talk) 13:58, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Declined BLPPROD: Jynx maze

I had to decline the BLPPROD here. While there is an on-going RfC on this point, consensus is and appears to be that even source of dubious reliability, such as IMDB, is "enough" to prevent placing a BLPPROD tag, this is explained in more detail at WP:BLPPROD#Nominating. The article may still be, after an appropriate search for sources, eligible for PROD and/or AfD. Sorry for the inconvenience. --joe decker ^{talk to me} 15:05, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Much appriciated

Thank you for clearing up the issue with redirects, wasn't sure if I was right or not. -- Luke (Talk) 03:17, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Illustrations of Pennsylvania municipalities

Do I remember rightly that you're working on a project to get at least one photo for each Pennsylvania municipality? And if so, do you have a checklist online that I could see? I ask because I'm in Pennsylvania until Monday (Homecoming weekend!) and I might try to get some illustrations for you if I know what you need. Nyttend (talk) 01:45, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I asked the same thing of Ruhrfisch, and his response has made me realise that I confused you with Dincher, now Gerry D — sorry for that. Nyttend (talk) 13:01, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hannah Cornett

The article Hannah Cornett has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The only source for the acting claims is the IMDB entry, which may not be reliable. If it is correct, the roles do not support a claim of notability under WP:ENT. The only other reference remaining is the Deadspin article which indicates Cornett's history is fabricated (i.e., she is not notable by WP:BLP1E).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cmprince (talk) 22:00, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hannah Cornett for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hannah Cornett is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hannah Cornett until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Cmprince (talk) 22:00, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sharing information

How can I share these information on facebook via links? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pranav.jha98 (talk • contribs) 09:45, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What information? I'm guessing that you could copy the URL of the page and post it to Facebook but I'm not sure what you're referring to specifically. Dismas|^(talk) 10:27, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Peter H. Thomas Article

Hi Dismas, I have updated the a few of the sources on the Page for Peter H. Thomas. There are also a couple of new links to recent awards that I feel justify his inclusion on wikipedia. Please let me know what else I can do to make this article comply with wikipedia standards. As of right now, only one source is self published. Much of the information can be cross referenced in several sources. BC Business Magazine, Success Magazine, and the Royal Roads University Convocation page all cover similar information on Peter Thomas.

Thanks for your time. RobPearlman (talk) 15:45, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Missy Monroe

Why do you keep taking out the truth??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by MissyMonroeFan (talk • contribs) 05:16, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Dismas/archive14! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

AWB question

I thought it might be easier just to come here rather than the AWB page. Can you provide a couple examples of the fields you want to delete? --Kumioko (talk) 23:37, 2 November 2011 (UTC) [reply]

Hello, Dismas. You have new messages at Kumioko's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Playmates of 2012

I made the template and added a link to 2012 on the general Playmates template. Just noticed the undo of a change to March 2012. I have no idea where that info comes from. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cbz030 (talk • contribs) 05:25, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nicole Sheridan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nicole Sheridan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicole Sheridan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.David in DC (talk)

New Page/Thomas Simpson

Hello,

The article/pgae I am trying to start is not about me. It's my Grandfather and his service in the Second World. The problem is that I am not sure how to do it all.

Can you help me out?

Ron Simpson — Preceding unsigned comment added by ThomasJosephSimpson.D.S.M (talk • contribs) 13:12, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kimber West

When I click on Kimber West or ask for her in Wiki I get redirected to List of Playboy Playmates of 1998 and not where she should be in the List of Playboy Playmates of 1997 (February) Vanderhydeinak (talk) 04:13, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Crissy Moran picture

Would you please remove the picture of Crissy Moran, or change it to a picture that is a little more appropriate? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dhgruett (talk • contribs) 21:41, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, well how about cropping it at least to just show her face? It only takes a second to do. I'll do it if you want. Dhgruett (talk) 22:05, 6 December 2011 (UTC)Darren.[reply]

I took care of that. Thanks for your help, and sorry for the trouble. Dhgruett (talk) 22:25, 6 December 2011 (UTC) Darren[reply]

Bechdel

You're welcome. I know it only because it comes up a lot at televisionwithoutpity.com, where I hang out a bit. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 03:22, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've never heard it pronounced, actually. I've always assumed BEKdel, but I guess it could be BekDEL. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 02:27, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Krista Allen

The edit is accurate and a reference has been cited.(72.136.28.234 (talk) 08:51, 1 January 2012 (UTC))[reply]

You removed sections due to IMDb being an unreliable reference, yet left other sections that don't have a reference. (72.136.28.234 (talk) 09:35, 1 January 2012 (UTC)0[reply]

Yep. And your point? Dismas|^(talk) 09:59, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

reference help

hi,

this is boowhy; got your help and put in the reference.

thanks,

Boowhy (talk) 03:33, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User Boxes

Can you tell me Where templates/user boxex can be found YO 11:29, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Roger Blackwell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Branding (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mass Effect 3

Hey. I think you're an administrator or... special editor? I may be wrong but uhh... regardless:

The Mass Effect 3 wiki page is semi-protected to help vandalism efforts, which is fine. The rating on it is BBFC 15 right now. It's since been given a PEGI rating (18) and I wanted to update the page with that, but since I can't, think you could do that for me?

For proof of this rating, you can check the game's page on GAME.co.uk or any similar sites, or also go to the Mass Effect official website and watch some of the videos on there. They all start with the PEGI 18 warning. Lord-Schmee (talk) 16:33, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RE: You seemed pretty big on here, thanks for the info regardless! :D — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lord-Schmee (talk • contribs) 20:28, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

kelly carrington

kelly carrington

Hi there,

I was wondering if you could please assist me in editing kelly carringtons page. Do you have any email I can contact you through to discuss more in detail.

Thank you! Listensally (talk) 18:20, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bailey-Jay

Okay, so you removed what I wrote about Bailey Jay having a penis. I'm not going to second guess your motives. I think it should go in, because Bailey Jay does porn. What is your rationale for taking that out? You can list a bunch of "WP:" cites. I've probably read them. Podex Mandrake (talk) 02:09, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No, I'm not interested in making a point. The status of someone's genitalia usually isn't important, but in porn it is. There are people (not me) who like what they call "traps," people who look like women in every respect but have a penis. I don't know if "pre-op" is satisfactory, because it sounds like Bailey Jay needs an operation. See what I'm getting at? I understand you can't say "trap," "dickgirl," or "chicks with dicks," but I don't see the point in dancing around with language and failing to explain this performer's particular appeal. Podex Mandrake (talk) 02:35, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just Wondering

Hi Dismas,

Made some edits to the Kelly Carrington Wiki-page earlier today and saw that you changed it. Just wondering if we were doing it wrong? Or if there was a reason for you doing so.

Let us know asap!

Intern22222 (talk) 20:58, 31 January 2012 (UTC) 22222[reply]

Thanks so much for all of your help, we will certainly read up on what you suggested!

Appreciate your time! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Intern22222 (talk • contribs) 21:17, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your deletion of the comment regarding http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Phil_and_Marlene.jpg may have been hasty

Hello. I happened to note the request for help regarding the comment on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Phil_and_Marlene.jpg and your deletion of same. In my view when someone asks for help they are asking to be taught as well. This requires the administrator to put some thought into what they are doing and it does not seem to me that you did here. Within the context of the picture standing alone, the comment was if anything a non-sequitor, since the editor addressed an issue which, to anyone but the most astute viewer, was unrelated. A proper determination to delete something from a TALK page required that the administrator review the uses to which the photo had been put. Had this been done it would have been noted that in the article pertaining to The Church of Latter Day Saints, the caption indicated that the photo had been taken with a Manti, Utah Moromon Temple in the background.

The real error made here was that the individual who originally complained about racism[sic] needed to at least be informed that his comment was made in the wrong place, that it should have been placed on the Talk page for the LDS page not the Talk page for the photo itself. Had it been there, it might still be considered an as-a-forum comment - after all you are the expert - but at least it would have been judged within the context of where it appeared. QuintBy (talk) 01:47, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're not an administrator? Then I REALLY don't understand why, when someone asked for help, you jumped in yourself and deleted a comments on the Talk page for a photo called "Phil and Marlene", giving no explanation, while having no idea why the comment was there in the first place. QuintBy (talk) 05:21, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever, Dismas. Whatever. QuintBy (talk) 19:10, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

To that I would add that that I continue to be mystified by your seeming lack of understanding of my critical comments regarding your unjustified undo of prior comments left on the Talk section about a seemingly generic bride and a groom photo of the two standing together. It

Seamus (dog)

I noticed that your contributed to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seamus (dog). Please note that there is a new AfD for the same article. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seamus (dog) (2nd nomination) HHIAdm (talk) 18:44, 27 April 2012 (UTC) seems doubtful to me that anyone would ever be searching for Phil_and__Marlene.jpg.[reply]

I will also point out to you what I have recently to several other long-timers on Wikipedia. Taking advantage of a higher familiarity with Wikipedia terminology in order to get the drop on a less experience editor is inappropriate and I think inconsistent with the underlying precepts of Wikipedia. Yet you did just that when you challenged my use of the term administator, a term which I was obviously using only loosely to characterize your higher-ranking status within Wikipedia's ornately elaborate chain of command. True, you are not an administrator but you are a recent-change auto-patroller and as such have been entrusted by Wikipedia to proceed with due diligence in that role. I still don't belief that an effort has been made by you,even after I took you to task, to understand the circumstances which lead to comments that appeared in reference to the photo suggesting it was an example of "racism", etc. Yet you have allowed your undo to remain intact. I don't think that lives up to characteristics which qualify patrollers to assume that role within the Wikipedia hierarchy. QuintBy (talk) 21:36, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is my last comment on this matter, which relieves me and I'm sure relieves you. It's actually a question. What exactly is there about a comment concerning the Mormon faith which, even if flatly anti-Mormon (the comment you deleted was in fact pro-Mormon) that could possibly constitute the racism[sic] which you make reference to? QuintBy (talk) 17:48, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that revert

Hi Dismas! This edit strongly suggests, a fortiori that I should change my username to User:Mister Stoopid Head 58. --Shirt58 (talk) 12:04, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You (But Still More Advice Requested)

Thank you for your guidance. (I am Zay N. Smith or nortythebartender and you offered me help with the submission under the name "Susy Schultz.") Our earlier corespondence is at the end of this message. My problem now is that I have managed to upload a photo of Susy Schultz (Susy Schultz.jpg at http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Susy_Schultz.jpg) but am confounded at how to place it on the page. (The photo was taken by a member of her family and sent to me by her at my request for entry; it is a photo widely available on the Internet as the standard photo sent out in publicity and other requests attendant to her work.) I like to think I am fairly intelligent, but, despite some efforts, I remain a dolt when it comes to computer work. All I am seeking to do is put it on the page of her entry. But I have failed so far. Any help you can give me in accomplishing this would be deeply appreciated. Zay

Here is our earlier correspondence: My name is Zay N. Smith and I worked most recently as a columnist for the Chicago Sun-Times. The entry for SUSY SCHULTZ is my second submission to Wikipedia (the first was ROGER SIMON--journalist. I needed all kinds of help with the submission and would ask for help now. I am sure the formatting can be improved.

There is also a public domain photo for the submission that I can't figure out how to upload. It is at: http://www.google.com/imgres?hl=en&sa=X&biw=1342&bih=555&tbm=isch&prmd=imvnso&tbnid=NaSW0o3kANkvSM:&imgrefurl=http://ivoh.org/&docid=8RQhcJRNXF0ZdM&imgurl=http://ivoh.org/files/images/management_team/SusySchultz.jpg&w=200&h=246&ei=oDZpT-ObKu-CsgLI06CeAg&zoom=1&iact=rc&dur=178&sig=118263982545705733017&page=1&tbnh=114&tbnw=93&start=0&ndsp=26&ved=1t:429,r:1,s:0&tx=39&ty=71

Any help you can give me would be deeply appreciated.

Zay Smith

Nortythebartender (talk) 02:03, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

You can go to WP:UPLOAD and that should get you started. If you need any help with that, we'll be happy to assist. I'm going to leave a welcome message on your talk page that will have many other helpful links as well. Thanks for editing! Dismas|(talk) 02:19, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Nortythebartender (talk) 20:13, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You Again

Thank you again for all your help (especially with the pic). I have done some further minor tweaking so far. You mention a "citation needed" for the Pulitzer nomination. I am having trouble finding a linkable print reference. I can offer only myself as a first-person reference, being a columnist at the Sun-Times when the series "State of the City" on Mayor Harold Washington was nominated by the paper for a Pulitzer (which it did not win) and being aware closely of editorial deliberations and nominations. Other citations are hard to come by because of their age (the Sun-Times Internet site, sadly, does not keep articles for long). Other links, such as those from High Beam and other such services, do not survive for long, in my experience. I will keep working on it (and in the meantime can attest that as a reporter and columnist, there is nothing in the entry that I would hesitate to put into print in any of the newspapers, magazines, or publishing houses I've written for). Again, thank you for your help, and I will see what I can do to improve the entry further (I think I will prepare a brief Wikipedia submission about Images & Voices of Hope, the global think tank of which Ms. Schultz is now executive director, which should be helpful to the reader and researcher. Zay Nortythebartender (talk) 02:16, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ital Changes

Sorry. I am new to this and made a few mechanical errors in trying to make things blue and ital.

I think I have now made the necessary changes in this matter but am stuck on The Daily Journal. That is the precise and full name of the Kankakee, Ill., paper referred to but the only Wikipedia listing is for the The Daily Journal in Venezuela. Right now The Daily Journal is in ital and black. I think it is supposed to be in ital and red. But I can't figure out yet how to do this.

I assure you that the think tank referred to is of importance (I can't remember if I mentioned this in previous communication). It is independent and features seminars and summits with some of the top journalists around (such as the editor of Harvard's Neiman Reports and the world editor of the Miami Herald). I am preparing a separate submission on this organization to help the reader and researcher.

Again thank you for your help.

Zay. Nortythebartender (talk) 02:43, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Names removed

As per [1], I have removed the names you mentioned for two reasons. Firstly unless I missed it, the source you provided doesn't seem to support your claim of an admission of guilt. Secondly, for WP:BLP reasons it's best to keep highly identifying info like names out when discussing living people, particularly non notable ones, even if what you're discussing is supported by sources. Obviously if the identity or information matters to the question then this isn't an option, but I don't see that it matters what the names of the accused murderers are to your question. Nil Einne (talk) 01:47, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Stephanie Adams

I'm doing a bit of reserach on here and you seem to edit playmate information. Should this model's information be expanded on the page that mentions her and why is her name constantly being removed by a user named user:fasttimes68? 74.101.6.200 (talk) 17:17, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You said "...be expanded on the page that mentions her..." but you didn't say which page you're referring to. Her article is fine as is, unless there is more notable and sourced information that you know of that can be added to it. What I think you're referring to though is the addition of her name to the list of notable Playmates to the Playboy Playmate article. I'm fine with her being listed there and a description simply reading "author and gay rights advocate" or something similar to that. As for why Fasttimes keeps removing it... Well, you'd have to ask them. So far, their edit summaries have just said that they don't think that she's notable. Dismas|^(talk) 17:57, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and thank for your reply. If you look at the edit history of fasttimes68, he keeps blanking her name off of pages such as:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephanie http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/July_24 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairleigh_Dickinson_University http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilhelmina_Models http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Playboy_Playmate http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_gay,_lesbian_or_bisexual_people:_A http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_women_writers http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_astrologers

I'm trying to find out what is going on and asking for editing help because soon after I restored her name on most of those links, someone named calabe1992 removed it again and accused me of softpuppeting. Can you add it back, since you are an expert on here? She is a legitimate playmate, model and author. I'm wondering why her name is being removed all over this site. Also, can her biography be elaborated upon? There is so much online written about her. What about a sentence or two? Please advise. 74.101.6.200 (talk) 18:12, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're clearly operating many accounts. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hershebar. Calabe 1992 18:14, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Calabe, that is certainly not me because I just created this new one right now with my own personal e-mail. So why are you removing verified information that was on there for years? I'm actually trying to correspond with Dismas here. Hellotoyoumyfriend (talk) 18:24, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, sure. Calabe 1992 18:29, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lists such as those you point out are not always meant to be exhaustive. For instance, the July 24 article. And I was unaware of the recent resurgence of the Stephanie supporters. Every couple years this crops up. Someone gets the idea into their head to make more of Ms. Adams than she really deserves and they try to make changes to her article that make her out to be whatever she wants to be at that time. Dismas|^(talk) 19:56, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Dismas. You have new messages at Calabe1992's talk page.
Message added 17:52, 30 March 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Calabe 1992 17:52, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Abigail Clayton

Hi Dismas. Thanks for keeping an eye on things. I'm guessing you're an RCPer. To answer your question, I'm formatting the refs that way to make it easier to fill them out while i'm working on the article. I'm still working on the article as we speak. I didn't ad an {{inuse}} because the article didn't seem to have many editors. Would you like me to add one? Also, we edit conflicted. Do you mind if I revert you as I'm still working on the article? Thanks. 64.40.54.230 (talk) 02:45, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If there'd have been an inuse template on the article, I wouldn't have touched it and let you continue what you were doing. I didn't know what you were doing, so that's why I stepped in. So, yeah, it might be best if you use the template. Go ahead and revert if it would help you work out the formatting. Thanks for your efforts!! Dismas|^(talk) 03:00, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK.

Thank you 64.40.54.230 (talk) 03:06, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Marilyn Waltz 1954.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Marilyn Waltz 1954.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:23, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited! New England Wikimedia General Meeting

	New England Wikimedia General Meeting
	The New England Wikimedia General Meeting will be a large-scale meetup of all Wikimedians (and friends) from the New England area in order to discuss regional coordination and possible formalization of our community (i.e., a chapter). Come hang out with other Wikimedians, learn more about ongoing activities, and help plan for the future! Potential topics: What is a Wikimedia chapter and should we work towards one? Planning of regular Boston meetups (any other New England cities?) Planning for upcoming coordinated events (Wikipedia Love Libraries, Wiki Loves Monuments, Wiknic, etc.) Outreach to universities (WikiProject Academical Village) and cultural institutions (GLAM) Wikimania DC is this summer. Your ideas!
	Sunday, April 22 1:30 PM – 4:30 PM	Conference Room C06, Johnson Building, Boston Public Library—Central Library 700 Boylston St., Boston MA 02116
Please sign up here: Wikipedia:Meetup/New England!

Message delivered by Dominic at 08:34, 11 April 2012 (UTC). Note: You can remove your name from this meetup invite list here.[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 17

Hi. When you recently edited Miro Weinberger, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chittenden County (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dani Woodward

Sorry, I'm still trying to figure this wiki editing out. I'm not even sure if this is the right place for me to respond. (I couldn't figure out how to reply the talk place)...To answer your question, I changed the pic of Dani Woodward because I am Dani Woodward, and I can't stand that ugly pic that was taken of of me years ago. I'm making a weird face, it's awful pic. I tried to replace it with a pic of me winning an AVN award but you removed it, I assume for possible copy write issues? So then I tried replacing it with a candid shot of myself, just as a place holder until I could figure out how to upload a profession pic, but you keep talking that down as well. Please advise? Thanx! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sunny Santa Fe 64 (talk • contribs) 02:29, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Beatles infobox

There is a straw poll taking place here, and your input would be appreciated. — GabeMc (talk) 01:53, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Seamus (dog)

I noticed that your contributed to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seamus (dog). Please note that there is a new AfD for the same article. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seamus (dog) (2nd nomination) HHIAdm (talk) 18:41, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]