User talk:Discover New Music

July 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to I Don't Wanna Grow Up has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: I Don't Wanna Grow Up was changed by Discover New Music (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.924846 on 2015-07-21T23:09:27+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:09, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Alex Young (singer)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Alex Young (singer), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. • Gene93k (talk) 23:14, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User:Gene93k with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:16, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:Gene93k with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:16, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at Alex Young (singer), you may be blocked from editing. • Gene93k (talk) 23:17, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Gene93k you destroy the work of others, depriving the freedom of others, disturbing others work and blocking others pages. Wikipedia is a free encyclopedia, but if the time everything should be blocked and eliminated by you that you act arrogant and disprectufll with the work of other, then I delete my account and use other platforms. You need to be locked and deleted from Wikipedia because what you do is not right is a contempt for others. Your works are very constructive and does not have the suitable knowledges to afford to and deleting pages!

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Alex Young (singer). —teb728 t c 23:50, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Amazing (Alex Young album) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amazing (Alex Young album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amazing (Alex Young album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. • Gene93k (talk) 18:07, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BebeRexhaIDWTGU.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BebeRexhaIDWTGU.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:49, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:LunchMoneyLewisChloeAngelides.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:LunchMoneyLewisChloeAngelides.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 07:28, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:LunchMoneyLewisChloeAngelides.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LunchMoneyLewisChloeAngelides.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Corey Chorus

The article Corey Chorus has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Uncle Roy (talk) 01:16, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Corey Chorus

Hello Discover New Music,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Corey Chorus for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

MainlyTwelve (talk) 22:01, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Alexandraalexyoung.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Alexandraalexyoung.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Majora (talk) 00:04, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a suspected sock puppet of AndCx (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this is a sock puppet account, and your original account is blocked, please also note that banned or blocked users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; and all edits made under this account may be reverted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:05, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Discover New Music (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi NinjaRobotPirate, the reason for this new account is due to the fact that my previous account has been blocked, I did not even have to delete it, because every time I accessed it, everything was blocked. I have created important pages, with references, links and everything else, following every single Wikipedia policy. I did not do any vandalism except to change errors on other pages. I was very careful to contribute to Wikipedia. This account has been created for a year, while the previous one has been blocked for 4 years. I am very disappointed by this situation, because I believe that by checking from where I log in with my accounts, you are violating my privacy, this is a crime in my country that is not US, can condemn and denounce you for violation of my privacy entering my computer". According to the biggest disappointment it is precisely this "hater" attitude that some wikipedia users have towards others. And I hope that my pages will be restored and my account unlocked, otherwise I can only report everything for violation of privacy and hacking. I hope all this can be solved!

Decline reason:

"my other account is blocked" is not an acceptable reason to create a new account and violates our policies. You need to request an unblock through your former account using the WP:UTRS system. Creating a new account to get around the block is called blocked evasion, so this is a perfectly valid block. Additionally, our checkuser policy is in line with the privacy policy noted at the bottom of every page here. There is nothing "hacking" about it, nor is it a violation of your privacy. These are things you agree to when creating and editing on Wikipedia. I don't know who you'd "report" this to, but if you're making a legal threat we'll need to revoke your talk page access. only (talk) 22:22, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'll just add that a CheckUser check is not performed by "entering your computer", it only uses the information that your IP connection provides to the Wikipedia servers when you request access - the same information that you provide to all other web sites you visit. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 22:31, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]