User talk:Die Pillen in mir

Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Directories and indexes Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

March 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like you to assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not do on Talk:Spanish flu. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Peaceray (talk) 22:39, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

Incorrect. The comment in question clearly does not make any presumption regarding the good faith, or lack thereof, of any edit or its editor. It is in fact a defence of those whose viewpoints were arguably being accused of not being in good faith by the editor of its parent comment. Please reread the very behavioural guidelines to which you have linked, which state within the very first paragraph that

This guideline does not require that editors continue to assume good faith in the presence of obvious evidence to the contrary (e.g. vandalism).

Before you criticize an edit or accuse the editor of misconduct – as you have done – please read the entirety of the contribution carefully and challenge yourself on how your application of any rules or guidelines might be flawed. I cannot emphasize this enough, for the same guidelines also advise that one

Be careful about citing this principle too aggressively. Just as one can incorrectly judge that another is acting in bad faith, so too can one mistakenly conclude that bad faith is being assumed; exhortations to "Assume Good Faith" can themselves reflect negative assumptions about others.

Die Pillen in mir (talk) 17:05, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Die Pillen in mir, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Die Pillen in mir! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:10, 22 March 2020 (UTC)