User talk:Diabolo4094

November 2023

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Siege of Mərzili, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it has been moved to where you can continue to work on it. Please consider using the Article Wizard or the Articles for Creation procedure. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read "Your first article". You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. CycloneYoris ^talk! 23:47, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Siege of Mərzili. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. CycloneYoris ^talk! 00:24, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Capture of Mubariz. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 09:28, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this edit to Siege of Mərzili, you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Eteethan (talk) 06:23, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with this edit to Siege of Mərzili. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 06:24, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Siege of Mərzili. Eteethan (talk) 06:25, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cut and paste move

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Siege of Mərzili. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:56, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Capture of Mubariz moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Capture of Mubariz. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 06:49, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Capture of Mubariz

The article Capture of Mubariz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unverifiable, the sole reference doesn't support the claims, and there is already a draft for this which can be expanded if it could be an article after all.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 15:47, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Capture of Mubariz for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Capture of Mubariz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Capture of Mubariz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 20:14, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Protection

Good morning Can you protect the page "Siege of Mərzili" and authorize only me who can edit the page because many people come and modify the real information into false. Diabolo4094 (talk) 13:15, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Diabolo4094. Thank you for your work on Artak Gabuzyan. User:Atsme, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To avoid potential deletion of your article, please provide better sources for verification.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Atsme}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Atsme 💬 📧 13:42, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Siege of Mərzili for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Siege of Mərzili is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siege of Mərzili until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Annwfwn (talk) 22:57, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

You have been blocked from editing from certain namespaces ((Article)) for a period of 36 hours for disruptive editing and failure to communicate. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. EvergreenFir (talk) 18:35, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Artak Gabuzyan, you may be blocked from editing. Philipnelson99 (talk) 20:09, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Capture of Mubariz. Apparently you never learned from the dozen or so previous warnings and subsequent block, so I suggest you heed this one before you get blocked indefinitely. Stop removing AFD tags and stop adding deprecated sources. PICKLEDICAE🥒 20:49, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

PICKLEDICAE🥒 20:57, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 02:26, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My account is blocked and Siege of Mərzili have incorrect information

My Account is blocked to edit a articles please unblock my account i didn't do anything.

And the sources of Siege of Mərzili is fake sources removes it please Diabolo4094 (talk) 16:48, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Capture of Mubariz

Hello, Diabolo4094. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Capture of Mubariz, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:05, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Siege of Merzili

Hello, Diabolo4094. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Siege of Merzili, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:06, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Siege of Mərzili

Hello, Diabolo4094. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Siege of Mərzili, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:10, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Capture of Mubariz

Hello, Diabolo4094. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Capture of Mubariz".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:22, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]