Jump to content

User talk:Dempsey Bloom

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Dempseybloom)

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Dempseybloom, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as CPAHS Student Faction Assembly, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Vigyani (talk) 05:48, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Dempsey Bloom. You have new messages at Talk:YMCA Youth Parliament.
Message added 03:33, 17 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I've started a discussion regarding this and the NSW article. Your comments are welcome. CaroleHenson (talk) 03:33, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi, In an edit summary I said that it's not right to put the link to another article in a section heading. The proper way is to put a main, further, or see also template in under the heading. For instance:

== Section heading ==
{{main|Other article name}}

I hope this helps for future reference. Take care.--CaroleHenson (talk) 04:19, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

NSW article

[edit]

I saw your not about wanting to fix the citations. So, I removed the worst of them - and marked were WP:Reliable sources are needed - and where WP:Citations from reliable sources are needed.

  • The worst of the citations have been removed: facebook, twitter and the blog.
  • From a purest perspective, there shouldn't be any primary sources. If the primary sources were removed, there would just be three secondary sources. The bulk of the article can absolutely not be based upon primary sources (notabililty, non-objective source issues).

Citation needed tags were added to identify where secondary sources are required. Tags were also added where the citations are primary sources and secondary sources (books, magazines, newspaper articles) are needed.

You may want to look at the YMCA Youth Parliament article, I found some reliable sources applicable for NSW content.--CaroleHenson (talk) 13:46, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Cpahsypmanifesto.pdf

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cpahsypmanifesto.pdf, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:44, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:Cpahsyouthparliamentseal.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]