User talk:DeltaWeb~enwiki

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Dear DeltaWeb: Welcome to Wikipedia, a free and open-content encyclopedia. I hope you enjoy contributing. To help get you settled in, I thought you might find the following pages useful:

Don't worry too much about being perfect. Very few of us are! Just in case you are not perfect, click here to see how you can avoid making common mistakes.

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user talk (discussion) page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. A third option is to ask a more experienced user such as an administrator.

One last bit of advice: please sign any discussion comment with four tildes (~~~~). The software will automatically convert this into your signature which can be altered in the "Preferences" tab at the top of the screen. I hope I have not overwhelmed you with information. If you need any help just let me know. Once again welcome to Wikipedia, and don't forget to tell us about yourself and be BOLD! -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 16:49, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Port of Le Havre

Welcome to Wikipedia, I see you are a new user as such I hope you followed the advise given above. I am puzzled by your claim to Copyvio on Port of Le Havre. Nowhere in the claim does it state what information you consider being thieved and nowhere in you statement is there an option to appeal and therefore turn the deletion. since the article was deleted, rather abruptlly and without consulting me, the primary author, I have no way to compare the document you claim be the original with the article I wrote. FYI, the document you claim Port of Le Havre was copied from is [1] Which I am sure you'll find after a more lengthy research than the few minutes you must have spent on this case was created after the Wikipedia article and not after considering the style the PDF is written in... I do not use PDFs as I am against the whole idea of PDFs, I have however authorised myself to have my eyes harmed by this proprietory formatted file to see where your claim lies. Before the article is reintroduced, please spend time justifying your decision, a second contributor seeing no justification in your actions. Regards, Captain Scarlet and the Mysterons 13:40, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, i'm not a "new-user", i participate more on the french Wikipedia (whith the same name user, DeltaWeb) and i am the creator of the french page "Port du Havre", i used your work on the history section of "Port of Le Havre" to write the section "histoire" of "Port du Havre", but at the end of my translation, i found the following webpage [2] witch was aslo in your text, so you know this webpage. Anyway, i translate your "work", but i did delete this from the french page to avoid a copyright problem and restart from my knowledge and research about the subject. I save my translation on this page [3]. You know I did not spend "few minutes" of research to compare your text and the original texte of havre-port.net, as i remember very well a text that i just translated DeltaWeb 13:54, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I welcomed you as a new user since your presence on EN Wikipedia is very recent. I let it be heard that your research was scarse since you wer einvolved in the shortsighted deletion of the Port of Le Havre article. Removing the referenced webpage from the translated French article will only bring request for source and might bring a justified deletion due to lack of source, your actions would then bring deletion of the French counterpart but for different reasons, those however, perfectly justified. Captain Scarlet and the Mysterons 17:54, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The actual french article Port du Havre does not inclued any text from your text on the EN article Port of Le Havre ! It is completly free of copyright issue ! DeltaWeb 18:22, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quote i used your work on the history section of "Port of Le Havre" to write the section "histoire" of "Port du Havre" Make your mind up DeltaWeb. You seem unsure as to how phrase yourself... Captain Scarlet and the Mysterons 22:54, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"i used", it is in the past. "i translate your "work", but i did delete this from the french page", can you read that ?

After i discovered that your work could be under a copyright issue, i started to rewrite myself a new version and delete the old version ! Anyway i am on wikipedia to contribute to articles, not to fight with peoples who does not want to respect rules. DeltaWeb 00:05, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are selfrightous aren't you? You still are making little sense and your English is poor. If you are accusing me of not respecting the rules I would ask you to do so with documents or I should have to report you for diffamation. If you are here ot contribute to article then restrain yourself from judging other members. Captain Scarlet and the Mysterons 09:04, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Le Havre weatherbox

Template:Le Havre weatherbox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — ugen64 05:42, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called DeltaWeb. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name DeltaWeb~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

23:24, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

12:02, 22 April 2015 (UTC)