User talk:Datdicatorofstevensville

June 2015

Hello, I'm General Ization. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Palmetto Bay, Barbados, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 01:22, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello, Datdicatorofstevensville, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! General Ization ^Talk 00:04, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory Help directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Speedy deletion nomination of Stevensville movement

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Stevensville movement, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Joseph2302 (talk) 20:37, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:Joseph2302. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Calling me evil is a personal attack. Also, it's been clearly explained to you at the article talkpage why it's up for deletion. Joseph2302 (talk) 20:50, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Stevensville movement

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Stevensville movement, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. General Ization ^Talk 21:11, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you create an inappropriate page. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 21:12, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at User talk:Datdicatorofstevensville. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 21:14, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive behaviour. Your behaviour is verging on harassment. Wikipedia prides itself on providing a safe environment for its collaborators, and harassing edits, such as the one you made to User talk:Joseph2302, potentially compromise that safe environment. If you continue behaving like this, you may be blocked from editing. General Ization ^Talk 21:18, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Joseph2302, you may be blocked from editing. Stop posting rubbish on my talkpage. You are indefinitely banned from my talkpage. Joseph2302 (talk) 21:18, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 21:20, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Datdicatorofstevensville (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

reason I think that this block is unfair and should go through a judicial process Datdicatorofstevensville (talk) 21:40, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Thanks for confirming that you're not here to contribute positively. Your block has been extended indefinitely, and your right to edit this page has been revoked. Max Semenik (talk) 21:47, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.

Datdicatorofstevensville (talk) 21:37, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Frankly, I'm surprised you haven't been indefinitely blocked as WP:NOTHERE. The sheer number of warnings meant that admins had no other option than to block you, in order to protect the encyclopedia from your hoax/spam page, and your vandalisms. Joseph2302 (talk) 21:42, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Max Semenik (talk) 21:47, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]