User talk:Daneto~enwiki

     I remove all flamer or idiotic posts

Posted comment, talk page

Your post at my talk is incomprehensible. I do not know why you posted to me. Please do not post again unless you have something legitimate to discuss. Thank you. Djathinkimacowboy 22:51, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

you did not read my message with attention!--Daneto (talk) 15:47, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And you did not read mine which is above, so please stop! Or write in Serbian. Djathinkimacowboy 08:29, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I read User talk:Djathinkimacowboy#Daneto.--Daneto (talk) 13:25, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for attempting to harass other users. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Elen of the Roads (talk) 13:27, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Daneto~enwiki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I made this post in ANI because DIREKTOR reported me:

I ask: why this guy has not yet banned after these massive sanctions? Read Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Macedonia#Log of blocks and bans: he was blocked and topic banned constantly for WP:TEND, WP:DISRUPT, WP:OWN! These are only some vandalisms removing sources added by me and other users against his POV:

1
2
3
4
5

other users restore sentences and sources:

1
2

indeed he usually falsifies real history in articles and harrass other users such as in this case too! In article of communist Yugoslavia to claim elections themselves were fairly conducted by secret ballot is a huge falsity but I added sentences of Encyclopædia Britannica and book Communist Yugoslavia indeed democrat opposition was not allowed and I copied exactly words of sources! In article of Josip Broz Tito to claim his presidency has been criticized as authoritarian is huge tendentious because Broz Tito has been criticized as totalitarian and he is blamed for democide! Indeed in -titoism- Croat version you read first words Titoizam je jedna od totalitarističkih ideologija komunističkog: titoism is totalitarian communist ideology! This Croat guy can translate articles of his native language for to be neutral! This Croat guy knows communist Yugoslavia's real history very well because he is not from Papua and his POV which falsifies all Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Macedonia related articles is inconsistent with neutrality of this project!

Now I ask: does who harass who? DIREKTOR harass me and others! But if in your opinion, I am on violation of harassment, you can block me until tomorrow or next week or nex month but indefinitely ban is absurd sanction! I ask only a justifiable sanction because this is my first violation without previous warning while DIREKTOR has huge list of blocks related to his past violations! Regards,--Daneto (talk) 15:38, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline - please focus on your own block, not on other users. — Joseph Fox 15:44, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Daneto~enwiki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't understand this total ban which is not correct according to wiki's rule, you can block me until tomorrow or next week or nex month but indefinitely ban is absurd sanction! I ask only a justifiable sanction because this is my first violation without previous warning! Regards--Daneto (talk) 10:58 am, Today (UTC−5)

Decline reason:

If you're that familiar with "wiki's rule"s, then you knew your behavior wasn't acceptable. That means that you won't be unblocked until we can be sure you won't carry on behavior you know to be unacceptable in the future. If you want to be unblocked, please focus on convincing the reviewing administrator that you understand why you were blocked and that you intend to fix those issues. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 16:05, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Daneto~enwiki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

OK, now I understand and I assure: I will change my behavior without harass against other users! I ask only: give me a chance! Regards--Daneto (talk) 16:18, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Um, you didn't understand at all, then less than 30 minutes later you completely understand? Sorry, but that isn't very believable. To even have any hope of being unblocked, first, take a breather, walk away, and come back in a few days. Then, please explain to us exactly what was wrong with your previous behavior, what you will do to ensure it doesn't happen again, and what constructive work you plan to do on Wikipedia if you were to be unblocked. Qwyrxian (talk) 02:40, 24 November 2011 (UTC) OK, I can wait few days but I want alert you because I read your post to DIREKTOR in your talk:[reply]

Yeah, well, okay. How about I say, "an editor who has been the subject of many ANI reports, and whose behavior has often been criticized in those reports"? Oh, or, "an editor who has been blocked edit warring numerous times"? My use of "problem-editor" was simply a short-hand for these points. I do not believe that I made any comments about your behavior in this particular instance, so my apologies if you felt I was impugning you on this specific issue. Qwyrxian (talk) 12:44, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

now, after your apologies for expression "problem-editor", may you take a step against this behavior? Those IP's edits were not by me but that guy cited my user name in edit summary without justifiable reason! May I defend myself against personal attacks in this particular instance? Regards--Daneto (talk) 14:16, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Daneto~enwiki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

according to last admin's suggest, now I am ready to explain my wrong previous behavior: my blunder was a reaction against DIREKTOR's disruption on some articles by my opinion! Obvious I didn't use proper pages of project for discussion about problem but I harassed DIREKTOR with posts to other editors and post in ANI which is above. Obvious I will not repeat these actions: I understand my error! My intention is to make neutral articles because a lot of articles are biased very much! I can translate articles and related sources from various languages; I know a lot of books which are valid sources of project. I ensure: I will not repeat my mistake! Indeed you can read next section! Regards--Daneto (talk) 15:07, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The fact that you have an expectation that you will remove "idiotic posts" tells me you have no intent of working well with others. I'm revoking talk page privs.Toddst1 (talk) 04:34, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

urgent request

may you take a step against this behavior? After this umpteenth revert during umpteenth edit war! Those IP's edits were not by me but that guy cited my user name in edit summary without justifiable reason! May I defend myself against personal attacks in this particular instance? Regards--Daneto, 12:19, 25 November 2011

It doesn't really matter. It's not like it's impugning you, very much, and it's definitely not a personal attack. Just relax and walk away from Wikipedia for a few days. Don't keep checking all of the articles you were involved on. If you do that, you're only going to get more angry. Remember, anything that changes can be changed back. Once you're ready to clearly indicate what went wrong before and what you'll do to prevent it, then it will be time to consider an unblock. Meanwhile, just to be clear so that all bases are covered, and note that I am not accusing you of anything, but do not even consider attempting to edit Wikipedia through a new account or IP address. Qwyrxian (talk) 01:52, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I may have been mistaken - but its your edit, being pushed by an IP after you were blocked. --DIREKTOR ^(TALK) 07:30, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

first of all, previous guy continues in his wrong behaviour:

obvious these accuses are all inventions for convincing administrators to block fancied socks and to ban my account which is against his political propaganda! I weigh these accuses as personal attacks: may I defend myself against personal attacks in this particular instance? Regards--Daneto (talk) 13:41, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Daneto. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Daneto~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

23:18, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

11:54, 22 April 2015 (UTC)