User talk:CycloneYoris/Archive 6
This is an archive of past discussions about User:CycloneYoris. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | → | Archive 10 |
Please comment on Talk:Sobibór trial
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sobibór trial. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Fascism in Europe
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Fascism in Europe. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Thank U, Next
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Thank U, Next. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Solomon's Pools
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Solomon's Pools. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 April 2019
- News and notes: An Action Packed April
- In the media: Is Wikipedia just another social media site?
- Discussion report: English Wikipedia community's conclusions on talk pages
- Featured content: Anguish, accolades, animals, and art
- Arbitration report: An Active Arbitration Committee
- Traffic report: Mötley Crüe, Notre-Dame, a black hole, and Bonnie and Clyde
- Technology report: A new special page, and other news
- Gallery: Notre-Dame de Paris burns
- News from the WMF: Can machine learning uncover Wikipedia’s missing “citation needed” tags?
- Recent research: Female scholars underrepresented; whitepaper on Wikidata and libraries; undo patterns reveal editor hierarchy
- From the archives: Portals revisited
Please comment on Template talk:English grammar
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:English grammar. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Qizilbash
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Qizilbash. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Selected anniversaries/May 23
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Selected anniversaries/May 23. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Kamarupi Prakrit
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Kamarupi Prakrit. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Ainu language
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ainu language. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
If you have a problem with an editor or their edits...
Say it on their talk page. Don't go from page to page after them and indirectly undo most of their edits. It is absolutely leadworthy that songs whose sole purpose for being were as entrants in Eurovision did or did not make the final. The lead is a summary of the contents of the article, or supposed to be. It is therefore important to note their performance in the lead. Ss112 23:35, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
- @Ss112: Wow, calm down! FYI, I did not "undo" your edits, I simply moved the content you were adding from the lead into another section within the article. If you notice in previous editions of the contest, from 2017 and 2018 to be exact, none of the song articles mention anything about their non qualification in the lead; take a look at Montenegro's song Inje from last year and Space from 2017. These articles are supposed to emphasize more on the song and not just on their participation at Eurovision, since most of these songs even chart in some territories, it is inaccurate to say that they were just made for Eurovision. By the way, I don't have a problem with your edits, that is obviously why I didn't think it was necessary to write a comment on your talk page regarding this "issue", which isn't even an issue to begin with. I seriously don't get why you've made such a big deal about this. CycloneYoris talk! 06:45, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
- Are you for real right now, tagging me in retaliatory edit summaries? As I said, perhaps you need to learn proper grammar and do a quick Google search if you think "did not progress to" is not proper grammar. Progress is both a noun and a verb. Here it was being used as a verb. I encourage you, Google it. It absolutely is correct grammar—I'd love to know how you think it isn't. If you still think it isn't, perhaps we can get a copy editor from the GOCE to tell you it is. The song did not gain enough points to qualify or progress to the final. Either wording is fine because they both mean the same damn thing—simple as that. I don't care what previous Eurovision articles have done. That's an WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS argument. What's been done in the past or elsewhere is not always best for others. No need to ping me. Ss112 09:45, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
- Why shouldn't I ping you? You did the same thing to me when you reverted all of my edits on the Az én apám article. There is certainly nothing wrong with trying to make grammar corrections to your edits; I also encourage you to be civil when writing on my talk page, you come off as being rude and impertinent and there is no need to act in that manner, especially since I haven't been rude to you. CycloneYoris talk! 10:02, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
- I meant no need to ping me when you reply here. Also, they're not "corrections", you are talking about preferred wording within Eurovision articles because the show uses the word "qualify". There's a difference between preference and an actual mistake. Unless there is a Eurovision style guide that says we must say "qualify", even though readers will gather exactly the same thing—that Eurovision is a competition, the song was an entry and did not make the final—there is no need to change it. You are being rude—you tagged me in an edit summary claiming I made a grammar mistake as a way of retaliating against me because you're annoyed. Get over it. I also used the wording "qualify" on some articles, but I chose not to do this on all of them to change it up so I was not just copypasting the same sentence. If you continue changing all articles you can find that I've edited to say "qualify", we will have a more of an issue and I will involve an admin because that will not be a correction, it will be you having it out for somebody else. Bye. Ss112 10:37, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
- As far as I know, everyone inside the Eurovision world uses the word "qualify" instead of "progressed" when referring to a song that did not reach the final. Why should I be annoyed about that? Don't be silly. And please stop posting messages here on my talk page, we have already seemed to have resolved this issue and there is no need to dwell on it any longer. Bye. CycloneYoris talk! 11:07, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
- I meant no need to ping me when you reply here. Also, they're not "corrections", you are talking about preferred wording within Eurovision articles because the show uses the word "qualify". There's a difference between preference and an actual mistake. Unless there is a Eurovision style guide that says we must say "qualify", even though readers will gather exactly the same thing—that Eurovision is a competition, the song was an entry and did not make the final—there is no need to change it. You are being rude—you tagged me in an edit summary claiming I made a grammar mistake as a way of retaliating against me because you're annoyed. Get over it. I also used the wording "qualify" on some articles, but I chose not to do this on all of them to change it up so I was not just copypasting the same sentence. If you continue changing all articles you can find that I've edited to say "qualify", we will have a more of an issue and I will involve an admin because that will not be a correction, it will be you having it out for somebody else. Bye. Ss112 10:37, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
- Why shouldn't I ping you? You did the same thing to me when you reverted all of my edits on the Az én apám article. There is certainly nothing wrong with trying to make grammar corrections to your edits; I also encourage you to be civil when writing on my talk page, you come off as being rude and impertinent and there is no need to act in that manner, especially since I haven't been rude to you. CycloneYoris talk! 10:02, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
- Are you for real right now, tagging me in retaliatory edit summaries? As I said, perhaps you need to learn proper grammar and do a quick Google search if you think "did not progress to" is not proper grammar. Progress is both a noun and a verb. Here it was being used as a verb. I encourage you, Google it. It absolutely is correct grammar—I'd love to know how you think it isn't. If you still think it isn't, perhaps we can get a copy editor from the GOCE to tell you it is. The song did not gain enough points to qualify or progress to the final. Either wording is fine because they both mean the same damn thing—simple as that. I don't care what previous Eurovision articles have done. That's an WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS argument. What's been done in the past or elsewhere is not always best for others. No need to ping me. Ss112 09:45, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Falun Gong
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Falun Gong. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Kamarupi Prakrit
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Kamarupi Prakrit. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Kamarupi Prakrit
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Kamarupi Prakrit. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Xinjiang conflict
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Xinjiang conflict. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 May 2019
- From the editors: Picture that
- News and notes: Wikimania and trustee elections
- In the media: Politics, lawsuits and baseball
- Discussion report: Admin abuse leads to mass-desysop proposal on Azerbaijani Wikipedia
- Arbitration report: ArbCom forges ahead
- Technology report: Lots of Bots
- News from the WMF: Wikimedia Foundation petitions the European Court of Human Rights to lift the block of Wikipedia in Turkey
- Essay: Paid editing
- From the archives: FORUM:Should Wikimedia modify its terms of use to require disclosure?
June 2019 WPTC Newsletter
Volume XIV, Issue 39, May 31, 2019 The Hurricane Herald is the arbitrarily periodical newsletter of WikiProject Tropical Cyclones. The newsletter aims to provide in summary the recent activities and developments of the WikiProject, in addition to global tropical cyclone activity. The Hurricane Herald has been running since its first edition ran on June 4, 2006; it has been almost thirteen years since that time. If you wish to receive or discontinue subscription to this newsletter, please visit the mailing list. This issue of The Hurricane Herald covers all project related events from April 14–May 31, 2019. This edition's editor and author is Hurricane Noah (talk · contribs). Please visit this page and bookmark any suggestions of interest to you. This will help improve the newsletter and other cyclone-related articles. Past editions can be viewed here. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Article of the month, by Jason Rees History of tropical cyclone naming - The practice of using names to identify tropical cyclones goes back several centuries, with storms named after places, saints or things they hit before the formal start of naming in each basin. The credit for the first usage of personal names for weather systems is given to the Queensland Government Meteorologist Clement Wragge, who named tropical cyclones and anticyclones between 1887 and 1907. This system of naming fell into disuse for several years after Wragge retired, until it was revived in the latter part of World War II for the Western Pacific basin. Over the following decades, various naming schemes have been introduced for the world's oceans, including for parts of the Atlantic, Pacific and the Indian Ocean. The majority of these lists are compiled by the World Meteorological Organization's tropical cyclone committee for the region and include names from different cultures as well as languages. Over the years there has been controversy over the names used at various times, with names being dropped for religious and political reasons. For example, female names were exclusively used in the basins at various times between 1945 - 2000 and were the subject of several protests. The names of significant tropical cyclones in the North Atlantic Ocean, Pacific Ocean and Australian region are retired from the naming lists and replaced with another name, at meetings of the various tropical cyclone committees. Storm of the month and other tropical activity Cyclone Fani was an extremely severe cyclonic storm that made landfall in Odisha, India on May 3. The storm achieved peak intensity as a near Category 5-equivalent cyclone with 3-minute sustained winds of 215 km/h (130 mph), 1-minute sustained winds of 250 km/h (155 mph), and a minimum central pressure of 937 hPa (mbar). Fani caused over $1.8 billion (2019 USD) in damage in India and Bangladesh and killed at least 89 people.
New WikiProject Members since the last newsletter in April 2019 More information can be found here. This list lists members who have joined/rejoined the WikiProject since the release of the last issue in April 2019. Sorted chronologically. Struckout users denote users who have left or have been banned. To our new members: welcome to the project, and happy editing! Feel free to check the to-do list at the bottom right of the newsletter for things that you might want to work on. To our veteran members: thank you for your edits and your tireless contributions! Editorial for welcoming new users, by Hurricanehink Every year, editors new and old help maintain the new season of season articles. The older users are likely used to the standards of the project, such as how to Wikilink and reference properly. Newer users might make mistakes, and they might make them over and over again if they don't know better. If anyone (who happens to read this) comes across a new user, please don't bite, because with enough pushback, they'll decide that this group of editors is too mean, and unfun. This is all a volunteer project; no one can force anyone to do anything. We're all on here because of our love of knowledge and tropical cyclones. If you find someone new, consider using the official WPTC welcome template - Wikipedia:WikiProject Tropical cyclones/Welcome. I also encourage that if you know any tropical cyclone researchers, please speak up and try recruiting them to edit. Veteran editors can't keep editing forever. Life gets busy, and the real world beckons! Member of the month (edition) – Yellow Evan Yellow Evan has been involved with WPTC since 2008. Since the last newsletter, Yellow Evan has taken 5 typhoon articles to good article status as well as created 2 more. Overall, he has created and/or significantly contributed to more than 130 good articles. Your work in the Western Pacific Basin is invaluable... Thank you for your contributions! Latest WikiProject Alerts The following are the latest article developments as updated by AAlertBot, as of the publishing of this issue. Due to the bot workings, some of these updates may seem out of place; nonetheless, they are included here. Featured article candidates
Featured list candidates
Good article nominees
Good article reassessments
Peer reviews
Requested moves
Articles to be merged
Articles to be split
Updated daily by AAlertBot — Discuss? / Report bug? / Request feature?
Click to watch (Subscribe via RSS Atom) · Find Article Alerts for other topics!
This section lists content that have become featured, articles and lists, since the past newsletter in mid-April 2019.
WikiProject Tropical Cyclones: News & Developments
New articles since the last newsletter include:
New GA's include:
Current assessment table Assessments valid as of this printing. Depending on when you may be viewing this newsletter, the table may be outdated. See here for the latest, most up to date statistics.
From the Main Page From the Main Page documents WikiProject related materials that have appeared on the main page from April 14–May 31, 2019 in chronological order. WikiProject To-Do Project Goals & Progress The following is the current progress on the three milestone goals set by the WikiProject as of this publishing. They can be found, updated, at the main WikiProject page.
|
NoahTalk 22:41, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Kamrupi dialect
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Kamrupi dialect. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
2019 French Open
- Why is the one line of empty space between seed no. 16 and seed no. 17 relevant? TVShowFan122 (talk) 20:36, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- That empty space is needed to separate the seeds in two even columns, of 16 seeds each. CycloneYoris talk! 20:50, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- OK, thanks. TVShowFan122 (talk) 17:19, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Richard B. Spencer
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Richard B. Spencer. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:List of French marquisates
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of French marquisates. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
- Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
- Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
- Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:52, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Richat Structure
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Richat Structure. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Virginia Beach shooting
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Virginia Beach shooting. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Iraqi Turkmen
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Iraqi Turkmen. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
Weather
Do you work at NOAA? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.66.83.160 (talk) 23:07, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Indo-European languages
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Indo-European languages. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Schoharie limousine crash
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Schoharie limousine crash. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 29 June 2019 (UTC)