User talk:CycloneYoris/Archive 5
This is an archive of past discussions about User:CycloneYoris. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | → | Archive 10 |
Can you explain why your recent edits on this article don't violate the three revert rule. I see disagreement over some figures; where are these figures sourced? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:40, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
- Because the other user was vandalizing the page and adding false information, I was just reverting his edits and he kept vandalizing. These figures are sourced at the National Hurricane Center website (www.nhc.noaa.gov), you can see them for yourself. CycloneYoris (talk) 09:48, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
- Are you sure he was vandalising, or simply either making a good-faith mistake, or possibly even correcting the article? The edit in question changed the category of the storm from 4 to 5; none of these claims have an in-line citation, so I am not convinced your claim of "vandalising" holds water. I'm not a subject expert, so just pointing me at the NOAA website is unhelpful, say exactly where the information is and how this claim can be verified, so I can fact-check it. Otherwise, I think this is a straightforward content dispute, and since neither of you are discussing, by rights you could be blocked for violating 3RR. Maybe we should ask Michael Fish (off topic, I get increasingly fed up of people who don't remember the '87 storm because "they weren't born" - bah...) Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:54, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
- This is not a content dispute, this user was clearly adding false information to the article, you can search through the page history and also check the article about this storm: Hurricane Hector (2018) and see what Hector's true intensity is which is a Category 4 hurricane and did not intensify into a Category 5. I have absolutely no reason to lie and if the hurricane were a Category 5 I would not be disputing with other users about its intensity. CycloneYoris (talk) 10:06, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
- Hector never was a category 5. The advisory archives for the National Hurricane Center may be found here and the advisory archives for the Central Pacific Hurricane Center may be found here. I would also like to note that the user changed the winds and pressure of Hector to that of Walaka's peak intensity which was achieved 9 hours ago. FigfiresSend me a message! 10:14, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
- Okay, well I added a couple of
{{fact}}
tags to the content under dispute; if somebody who knows more about this topic than I do can add the citations in the right place, that would be great. In future, if somebody is making changes to unsourced content that you know is wrong and that you can prove is wrong, add the source to the article when you revert. Then when an admin like me (who is the least informed about the topic in question) pops in to see what's going on, we can make an appropriate decision on what to do. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:30, 2 October 2018 (UTC)- Thanks for the advice, I’ll try to provide the correct sources next time if something like that happens again. CycloneYoris (talk) 10:49, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
- Okay, well I added a couple of
- Are you sure he was vandalising, or simply either making a good-faith mistake, or possibly even correcting the article? The edit in question changed the category of the storm from 4 to 5; none of these claims have an in-line citation, so I am not convinced your claim of "vandalising" holds water. I'm not a subject expert, so just pointing me at the NOAA website is unhelpful, say exactly where the information is and how this claim can be verified, so I can fact-check it. Otherwise, I think this is a straightforward content dispute, and since neither of you are discussing, by rights you could be blocked for violating 3RR. Maybe we should ask Michael Fish (off topic, I get increasingly fed up of people who don't remember the '87 storm because "they weren't born" - bah...) Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:54, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Hurricane Rosa
Would appreciate it if you could help with expanding Hurricane Rosa (2018). Rosa is now a deadly storm... killed at least 1 person. FigfiresSend me a message! 03:18, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
- Got it, I'll search on the web and see what I can find. CycloneYoris (talk) 05:07, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks... is now the deadliest storm of the season as it has killed at least 13 people. FigfiresSend me a message! 15:52, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
- Wasn’t expecting so much damage from that storm, I’ll see if I can find something else to add. CycloneYoris (talk) 18:41, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks... is now the deadliest storm of the season as it has killed at least 13 people. FigfiresSend me a message! 15:52, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Hurricane Norman (2018) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hurricane Norman (2018) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hurricane Norman (2018) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. B dash (talk) 08:38, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Alan Walker discography
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Alan Walker discography. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Help talk:IPA/Italian
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Help talk:IPA/Italian. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:List of years in Bulgaria
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of years in Bulgaria. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
NHC conventions?
I think you undid an edit I made because I "didn't follow NHC conventions". However, the data is right from the site, and it would be a pain to use something else than {{Convert}}. Hdjensofjfnen (If you want to trout me, go ahead!) 19:00, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- But if you use {{Convert}} then it automatically changes the data that the NHC has on their site, (i.e. 40 knots = 46 mph) while the NHC has it at 45 mph. I know it can be tiring to edit it manually, but I don't think there's another way to do it. CycloneYoris talk! 19:39, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Oh, I see. It might be useful to use it for pressures, though. Hdjensofjfnen (If you want to trout me, go ahead!) 00:25, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
- Hmm, maybe. If it proves to be useful, then I don't see any problem with it. CycloneYoris talk! 01:56, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Regional power
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Regional power. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:List of missing aircraft
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of missing aircraft. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Leo Tolstoy
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Leo Tolstoy. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 October 2018
- From the editors: The Signpost is still afloat, just barely
- News and notes: WMF gets a million bucks
- In the media: Bans, celebs, and bias
- Discussion report: Mediation Committee and proposed deletion reform
- Traffic report: Unsurprisingly, sport leads the field – or the ring
- Technology report: Bots galore!
- Special report: NPP needs you
- Special report 2: Now Wikidata is six
- In focus: Alexa
- Gallery: Out of this world!
- Recent research: Wikimedia Commons worth $28.9 billion
- Humour: Talk page humour
- Opinion: Strickland incident
- From the archives: The Gardner Interview
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, CycloneYoris. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, CycloneYoris. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 1 December 2018
- From the editor: Time for a truce
- Special report: The Christmas wishlist
- Discussion report: Farewell, Mediation Committee
- Arbitration report: A long break ends
- Traffic report: Queen reigns for four weeks straight
- Gallery: Intersections
- From the archives: Ars longa, vita brevis
The Signpost: 24 December 2018
- From the editors: Where to draw the line in reporting?
- News and notes: Some wishes do come true
- In the media: Political hijinks
- Discussion report: A new record low for RfA
- WikiProject report: Articlegenesis
- Arbitration report: Year ends with one active case
- Traffic report: Queen dethroned by U.S. presidents
- Gallery: Sun and Moon, water and stone
- Blog: News from the WMF
- Humour: I believe in Bigfoot
- Essay: Requests for medication
- From the archives: Compromised admin accounts – again
The Signpost: 31 January 2019
- Op-Ed: Random Rewards Rejected
- News and notes: WMF staff turntable continues to spin; Endowment gets more cash; RfA continues to be a pit of steely knives
- Discussion report: The future of the reference desk
- Featured content: Don't miss your great opportunity
- Arbitration report: An admin under the microscope
- Traffic report: Death, royals and superheroes: Avengers, Black Panther
- Technology report: When broken is easily fixed
- News from the WMF: News from WMF
- Recent research: Ad revenue from reused Wikipedia articles; are Wikipedia researchers asking the right questions?
- Essay: How
- Humour: Village pump
- From the archives: An editorial board that includes you
Edits and Additions to JES' wikipedia page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jes_(musician)).
Hi Yoris,
I see you're regularly editing JES' page. I work on JES' management team and we would love to help keep the page up-to-date. I'm not an experienced editor and I don't want to endanger the health of the page so if there's a place to leave potential updates for proficient editors let me know and I'll start that process.
Best,
Wikiwiper (talk) 00:38, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
- Hi. Sure, you can leave any updates you want here on my talk page, so then I can incorporate them into Jes' article. CycloneYoris talk! 20:40, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 February 2019
- From the editors: Help wanted (still)
- News and notes: Front-page issues for the community
- Discussion report: Talking about talk pages
- Featured content: Conquest, War, Famine, Death, and more!
- Arbitration report: A quiet month for Arbitration Committee
- Traffic report: Binge-watching
- Technology report: Tool labs casters-up
- Gallery: Signed with pride
- From the archives: New group aims to promote Wiki-Love
- Humour: Pesky Pronouns
Eurovision Song Contest 2019
Hi, I’ve added several extra sources about the ticket prices concerning the Eurovision Song Contest 2019. Also, I’ve found sources that are talking about a temporary stop on ticket sales because of irregularities. Could/would you perhaps back me up in this topic? You can find the discussion here: Talk:Eurovision_Song_Contest_2019#Ticket_prices. Whatever you decide, it is much appreciated. Kind regards,「Robster1983」☞ Life's short, talk fast ☜ 13:31, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
- Hi. Yeah, I've also heard about the ticket prices being quite expensive, and I tried to rewrite the section that you added but it was removed. I do agree it should be mentioned, since it's an issue that affects the contest. I'll see what I can do though. :) CycloneYoris talk! 16:28, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
- It seems everything is OK now. Many thanks for your input, it is much appreciated! 🙂 「Robster1983」☞ Life's short, talk fast ☜ 19:41, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
- You're welcome. I'm glad that issue was finally resolved. CycloneYoris talk! 21:32, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
- It seems everything is OK now. Many thanks for your input, it is much appreciated! 🙂 「Robster1983」☞ Life's short, talk fast ☜ 19:41, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Gibraltar
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Gibraltar. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Raiffeisen Zentralbank
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Raiffeisen Zentralbank. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Assamese people
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Assamese people. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Gender feminism
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Gender feminism. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Culture of the United States
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Culture of the United States. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (geographic names)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (geographic names). Legobot (talk) 04:25, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 March 2019
- From the editors: Getting serious about humor
- News and notes: Blackouts fail to stop EU Copyright Directive
- In the media: Women's history month
- Discussion report: Portal debates continue, Prespa agreement aftermath, WMF seeks a rebranding
- Featured content: Out of this world
- Arbitration report: The Tides of March at ARBCOM
- Traffic report: Exultations and tribulations
- Technology report: New section suggestions and sitewide styles
- News from the WMF: The WMF's take on the new EU Copyright Directive
- Recent research: Barnstar-like awards increase new editor retention
- From the archives: Esperanza organization disbanded after deletion discussion
- Humour: The Epistolary of Arthur 37
- In focus: The Wikipedia SourceWatch
- Special report: Wiki Loves (50 Years of) Pride
- Community view: Wikipedia's response to the New Zealand mosque shootings
Please comment on Talk:Germanic peoples
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Germanic peoples. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Swedes
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Swedes. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Vietnam War
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Vietnam War. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Ainu languages
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ainu languages. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 13 April 2019 (UTC)