User talk:CtuLSHTM
Your addition to Tranexamic acid has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Speciate (talk) 01:46, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
Please could you give me some information as to why my recent revisions to the Tranexamic acid page have been removed. I made the revisions in order to expand and update the information in the page in order that it reflects current evidence. I included references throughout and do not believe that I have breached copyright. I would be grateful for your feedback. At the moment the Tranexamic acid page is incomplete and does not reflect the current evidence, so I would be grateful for advice as to how to revise the information in a way that is acceptable to Wikipedia.[User:ctuLSHTM] [User talk:ctuLSHTM|talk]CtuLSHTM (talk) 10:45, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
- Just paraphrase the text better. Nearly identical or identical wording is not allowed. Speciate (talk) 03:02, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
- please use review articles per WP:MEDRS Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 11:56, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
- We use review articles rather than primary sources. The trial it self is a primary source. WP:MEDRS give a further overview. The other issue is that you removed the review article that was already there.--Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:04, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
- Readded a couple of bits near the end. We also do not give medication doses on Wikipedia.Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:11, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
- We use review articles rather than primary sources. The trial it self is a primary source. WP:MEDRS give a further overview. The other issue is that you removed the review article that was already there.--Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:04, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
- please use review articles per WP:MEDRS Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 11:56, 23 December 2011 (UTC)