User talk:Cttam123

Welcome!

Hello, Cttam123! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Nzd (talk) 21:43, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Directories and indexes Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Career stats tables

The parent club should remain in there, so we know who they were on loan from. I have restored it to Bradley Collins. Giant Snowman 12:48, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018–19 SBV Vitesse season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charly Musonda (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Sean Whaler) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Sean Whaler, Cttam123!

Wikipedia editor SkyGazer 512 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thank you for creating all of these articles - I don't see anything here that obviously needs improvement.

To reply, leave a comment on SkyGazer 512's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

SkyGazer 512 ^{Oh no, what did I do this time?} 13:45, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Brian Galach

He is not notable - he has not played in a competetive match between two teams from WP:FPL (he played against Spurs U21s). I have merged your article with Draft:Brian Galach. Giant Snowman 14:07, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have previously been told (message directly above) that the Brian Galach was in draft. Why have you created another? Giant Snowman 08:22, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and I've just noticed your version was a copy & paste of the draft. Please never do this again - of you do I will block you for copyright violations, OK? See WP:C&P. Giant Snowman 08:41, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Reggie Young (footballer) (September 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

As noted by previous reviewer, does not appear to satisfy either association football notability or general notability. If this is resubmitted, please indicate in a comment how he qualifies so that it can be properly assessed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Reggie Young (footballer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Reggie Young (footballer), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 04:42, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cttam123! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 04:42, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Jake Hyde, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Soccerway don't include the FA Cup second qualifying round in their appearance data. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:04, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Reece Deakin, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.

'Footballwebpages' is not a reliable source. Giant Snowman 14:55, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Keith Rowland. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Egghead06 (talk) 15:11, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cttam123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Not entirely sure what I've done wrong, IP may of been blocked due to several others on the same network.

Decline reason:

Technical and other evidence make this pretty clear. GAB^gab 17:14, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cttam123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Any idea on how long this block will last?

Decline reason:

You are not eligible for unblock consideration here. Stop abusing the unblock template or you will lose access to this talk page. Yamla (talk) 16:30, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Cttam123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #23113 was submitted on Nov 02, 2018 14:10:16. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 14:10, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:David Sesay

Hello, Cttam123. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "David Sesay".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 15:56, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]