User talk:Croat Canuck/Archives1
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Croat Canuck. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Welcome!
Hello, Croat Canuck/Archives1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! D. J. Bracey (talk) 19:33, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
Home Run leaders
Usually, one would simply say "alphabetically" rather than "by letters of the alphabet". Wahkeenah 03:50, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
I didn't want to say "alphabetically" because then the article would seem to be about the home runs leaders in order alphabetically, as opposed to the leaders in home run of each letter. Croat Canuck 15:21, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
Aha! This is one of those "artificial" lists for amusement purposes, like listing every ballplayer with a name or nickname that's an animal, and calling it the "all-Zoo" team or some such: Walt "Moose" Moryn, Ryne "Ryno" Sandberg (intended to sound like "Rhino"), Joe "Ducky" Medwick, Tris "Gray Eagle" Speaker, etc. I can dig it. Somewhere I have a list that shows what I call "win patterns" in the post-season. I wonder if I should make a page out of that. Example: The Red Sox ALCS win over the Yankees last year, I call "aa hHH AA". Lost 2 "away", lost 1 "home", won 2 "Home", won 2 "Away". Obviously that's the first time that pattern ever has ever appeared. The most frequently occurring win pattern in a 7-game World Series, for example, is "aa HHH aA", which has occurred 4 times: 1955 BKN/NYY, 1956 NYY/BKN, 1965 LA/MIN, 1971 PIT/BAL d:) Wahkeenah 17:27, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
- Hey CC. Scanning the Recent Changes list I saw your Home run leaders by letters of the alphabet and then noted your comment above re you not wanting alphabetical order but listing according to each letter. We're urged to assume "good faith", but I can't resist asking -- are you winding us up? I propose to move the article to Home run leaders in alphabetical order unless you can give a compelling reason why I shouldn't. Moriori 02:42, August 28, 2005 (UTC)
- The article "Home run leaders by letters of the alphabet" shouldn't be changed into "alphabetical order" because the article isn't listing the home run leaders in alphabetical order. It is the top five home run leaders for each letter... I wish there was an easier and shorter way of making the title, but it is what it is. If it is changed to alphabetical order, it will be something that it is not. And I'm not trying to wind you up, I don't know where your coming from with that, but thats not what I'm trying to do. Croat Canuck 03:00, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
- OK. I see what you are getting at. I can't see why. Moriori 03:18, August 28, 2005 (UTC)
- The article "Home run leaders by letters of the alphabet" shouldn't be changed into "alphabetical order" because the article isn't listing the home run leaders in alphabetical order. It is the top five home run leaders for each letter... I wish there was an easier and shorter way of making the title, but it is what it is. If it is changed to alphabetical order, it will be something that it is not. And I'm not trying to wind you up, I don't know where your coming from with that, but thats not what I'm trying to do. Croat Canuck 03:00, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
Expos????
OK, I can see you're a Torontoan (Torontoer? Torontoite?), so I can see why you put Jays-Spos on that funky rivalries page. But, here's the key, was this rivalry just as passionate to Móntrèáléràns? I know it's Canada v. Canada, and I'm not sure but I think Ontarioaners love sticking it to Quebeckerers, but were there even really enough Spos fans to make this a rivalry? Pardon my Francois, but I beleive if you can prove it from both POVs, it stays; if ya cain't, it leaves. (Oh man, I'm gonna get reamed for this.)--CrazyTalk 03:56, August 23, 2005 (UTC)
Of course I can only report this from the POV of an Ontarian (I've only been to Toronto about 25 times in my life), however I can tell you why it is an important rivalry. Montreal used to be a popular team, although it was always second place to the Canadiens in terms of popularity, it had a nice fan base before the players strike of 94. The reason the fans disappeared was because the 94 Expos were the best team the Expos ever had, and were poised to win the World Series, when the stike ruined the season, and then all the good players left to the bigger-money ballteams. How does this tie into the rivalry? Well the Jays sprung up in 1977, and in the 1980's both teams were good, not World Series calibre, and each had their own set of stars. But the Jays kept making it to the playoffs, unlike the Expos. The Jays were like the lil bro who was great at everything, and that added one point to the rivalry. The second point to the rivalry is when the Jays grabbed all of Canada's attention in 92 and 93 when they won the World Series, meanwhile Montreal was stuck in good-but-not-great town. Then Montreal had its 94 team, and were gonna show the Jays but they failed because of the strike. Then when Interleague play was introduced, it brought on the short-lived Canada Day Matchup. Whoever won the series was the best in Canada, and I can remember watching those games on TV and being thrilled by the Toronto-Montreal matchup. Even though it isn't anything of the calibre of a Maple Leafs-Canadiens rivalry, it still represented the same principles that made THAT rivalry so great: Red vs. Blue, French vs. English, Ontario vs. Quebec, and so on and so forth. The Expos-Blue Jays rivalry wasn't only a rivalry of the teams, but it was baseball's version of one of the biggest rivalry's on Earth. It gave Ontarians a reason to laugh at the Quebecois, because the Blue Jays were actually a better team than the Expos. I bet there are still a few Expos fans out there who are still green with envy over the Jays still having a franchise, and having Two World Series banners, as well as a retractable dome that actually WORKS. Sorry, that was a little long, but when I get moving I don't stop. Croat Canuck 04:56, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
P.S., There is no official name for the rivalry, so I made up a few
- Actually, I think you more than justified a national rivalry and you should actually cut and paste the comments onto a new page and make that THE ARTICLE. (Wahkeenah had the same comment to your response on my talk page, too.) Once you get that article out there, I don't think anyone will disagree, but you might want to solicit an Expo POV, too. This is just my opinion, but maybe it should be seperate from the other rivalries since it is strictly in the past tense. Keep on keepin' on! --CrazyTalk 15:33, August 23, 2005 (UTC)
Canadian Spelling
Hey, Croat Canuck. I can see by your name you are emphasizing that you are a Canadian. I don't mean to be a nit-picky Canadian (or maybe I do), but you should try to use Canadian spelling. (That is, favourite instead of favorite on your personal webpage.) See Canadian English. Eduard Gherkin 00:52:40, 2005-09-13 (UTC)
Americanization is enveloping Canada way too much, as shown by my lack of Canadian spelling and thus clearly delving into my sub-conscious. Maybe I read just too many American texts, or maybe I have just a feud with the "u" button on my keyboard. But I definitely agree with you, I should be much more, shall we say, Canuck-like in my spelling. And if I do not spell in Canadian English, then therefore I am a no good Shatner-stealing Mexico-toucher (to steal a line from The Simpsons, an American show}. And Canada will most certainly turn into America if we all start dropping the "u"'s and flipping around the "e" and the "r" in "centre". So we must most definitely resist this and keep our country as different from America as possible. After all, Canada is my favorite country. Although I have been very sarcastic until this point, I will try to emphasize Canadianesque spelling in the future. Croat Canuck 03:52, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
Fixed stub problem
have a look at the change I made to Steve Eminger. you simply forgot to close the table. That was probably just a copy paste error. I do stuff like that all the time and wonder "what the??? Why isn't it working??" Masterhatch 03:53, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
- By the way, I must say that I really like how you use the full team name on the table. Many users only use the city when they make tables. That really annoys me. Oh, one more thing, in the post just above this one, you forgot the "u" in favourite. Cheers! Masterhatch 03:56, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
List of every NHL player
Hello Croat Canuck. I am wondering, when you fix links to hockey players, do you also fix the link here List of every NHL player? That is the master list of players and that one is very important to keep updated. It is almost 100% accurate. It is missing some rookies from this year and some rookies from the 2003-04 NHL season, but it is almost complete. I have been really busy with the List of NHL seasons lately and haven't had time to add all the new rookies yet. Masterhatch 04:37, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
Atlas-style!
Hey, good work on all the NHL-bios. I've been on this subject for a while, mostly trying to get Edmonton Oilers biographies into Wikipedia. If you get bored/sick of/overwhelmed with trying to get every bio on Wikipedia, might I suggest focusing on List of Toronto Maple Leafs players? Not that I want to discourage you, because the more bios we get, the better, but I personally find it easier to focus on teams I'm actually interested in. Oh, and by the way, thanks for pointing out that stuff about junior team categories. I didn't even know about them. All the best, Scïmïłar parley 21:28, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
Spokanites
Hey, long time, no chat. :P I just wanted to followup on the Spokanites category issue you were concerned with awhile back. If you check out this you'll see that one of the arbitrators believes location categories are only a guide. Anyhow, I just thought it was interesting since I'd never seen it mentioned anywhere. =) —Locke Cole (talk) (e-mail) 16:03, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
NHL Trophies
Good idea about adding the new cats. BUT remember one thing, you won't be a wikipedian forever! What I mean is, when you are gone (for whatever reason), will what you do be easy to follow for others? Are you creating a lot of work in upkeep? The more work in upkeep you create, the easier it is for everything to fall apart. Personally, I like the idea of creating cats for NHL awards.It makes sense. Masterhatch 10:09, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
In case you didn't notice, I left you some tongue-in-the-cheek advice on the AFD. Please don't shoot! I had my share of bananas already today. - Mgm|(talk) 11:53, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
Please revisit the debate, I've added additional evidence. - Mgm|(talk) 12:41, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
Admin Nomination
Croat Canuck, I have nominated you for a position in administration. Good luck with the campaign. Eduard Gherkin 03:39, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
Male Wikipedians
Hi! I noticed you made yourself a male userbox. I've just made a "standard" one at {{User:UBX/male}} (which slots you into Category:Male Wikipedians). Feel free to use it and/or edit it! — Asbestos | Talk (RFC) 19:07, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
Admin
Thanks for the vote of confidence but I am not sure that I want to be an administrator at this time. It would be a great honour, but lately I don't have the time to put into Wikipedia. A couple of months ago I was editing over 50 articles a day with well over 400 pages on my watch list. Now I have narrowed that down to just over 200 pages and I usually make less than 10 edits a day and those 10 edits are usually just a simple revert of vandalism. I still have quite the to-do list and when my schedule permits, i will get back to my to-do list and maybe then I will think about your nomination. Thank you. I did vote for you, though. I think you are a fine and trustworthy editor. Masterhatch 08:06, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
quick stats
I guess it is good for now, but it should be expanded with time. -- Earl Andrew - talk 06:54, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
OHL teams
Actually, the article should be where a team's history is presented; it's not really the category's job to provide that kind of information. For one thing, the category doesn't really explain why the subcategories are filed there, and for another, there's already an established practice for sports teams: when a team moves to a new city and adopts a new name, it's treated as a new team, not as an extension of the old one. We just can't really treat OHL teams differently than we treat NHL or NFL or MLB teams. Bearcat 23:02, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
malo's RfA
My RFA
Hey Croat Canuck! Thanks for your support on my RfA. The final outcome was an unanimous (45/0/0), so I am now an administrator. If you need help, or have a question, please don't hesitate to let me know! Again, thanks! :D --Eliezer | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 03:33, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
Congratulations!
Congratulations! It's my pleasure to let you know that, consensus being reached, you are now an administrator. You should read the relevant policies and other pages linked to from the administrators' reading list before carrying out tasks like deletion, protection, banning users, and editing protected pages such as the Main Page. Most of what you do is easily reversible by other sysops, apart from page history merges and image deletion, so please be especially careful with those. You might find the new administrators' how-to guide helpful. Cheers! -- 06:32, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
- Congratulations, and you're very welcome! --King of All the Franks 06:45, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
Congrats!
Nice work on your RfA. Have a look here :-D lol. Always sign right? KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 06:47, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
W.marsh's RfA
Thank you for your support on my RfA. The final outcome was (30/2/0). I will do my best at the position I now am in. Thanks again! --W.marsh 03:03, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
Croat Canuck
I am from CRoatia and I wanna be Canuck 2:-). Luka Jačov 21:58, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
Yes I got that from your page. What part of Croatia r your parents from? Where in Ontario r u from? Have u checked my articles? Many of them r Croatia related. Do u speak Serbo-Croatian enough to labeled as one by wikipedia babel? Luka Jačov 22:09, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
Have u found out the village name? what is family name (if that is not secret)? wikipedia states Kitchener-Windsor as in west ontario. how can it be central when it is on souther penninsula? does your place have article on wikipedia (cos u said u live near K-W)? Thanx. Luka Jačov 15:34, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
So did u father came back in town:)? Have u find out the name of the village? Luka Jačov 23:40, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
U probably meant Bosiljevo. I ve started article about Gorski kotar region Bosiljevo is also part of. U should check it. Luka Jačov 19:10, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
So have u read the article? Luka Jačov 14:15, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
Have u read any other of my articles? Luka Jačov 21:20, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
Alfredsson
Yeah, I dont think Alfie has Canadian citizenship. Anyways, I was unaware Sundin was traded to the Senators, because he certainly wasn't playing on the "best team in the world" for the Leafs ;-) -- Earl Andrew - talk 01:57, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
- Hey, I don't care where the Sens are in the standings (or their lack of playoff victories against the Leafs), they are the best team in the world :-D. -- Earl Andrew - talk 03:35, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
- Yes, the 67's suck this year. However, that bugs my mom more than it bugs me, as she is a die-hard 67's fan. However, don't bash Kilrea, he is a very good coach :-D -- Earl Andrew - talk 03:57, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
- Ha! Hasek is pretty good, although lately he is been sucking in the shoot outs. I noticed on your user page you have only been to one NHL game? That's unfortunate, maybe if you went to more games you would realize the Leafs are not the team that you should cheer for ;-) -- Earl Andrew - talk 05:00, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
- 1996? You must have been pretty young? And what's this about Sundin being better than Alfredsson? Such a silly remark, clearly that is no true. I know how hard it is to get Leafs tickets. Sens tickets are expensive too, but easier to get. I could have gone to a game this year, but I had school work to do :(. I did go to a pre-season game though, against Pittsburgh. Saw Sidney Crosby. :) -- Earl Andrew - talk 05:55, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
- a few more seasons like this, and Alfredsson will be hall of fame material. Especially when he leads Ottawa to a Stanley Cup win, something that will never happen for the Maple Laughs ;-) -- Earl Andrew - talk 06:01, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
- If that is true, they are all fools, and should be shot ;-) Sundin has never won the awards like Alfredsson has/will. Let's see, Calder, soon to be Hart, Art Ross, Conn Smythe :-D Sundin? Notta -- Earl Andrew - talk 06:10, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
- a few more seasons like this, and Alfredsson will be hall of fame material. Especially when he leads Ottawa to a Stanley Cup win, something that will never happen for the Maple Laughs ;-) -- Earl Andrew - talk 06:01, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
- 1996? You must have been pretty young? And what's this about Sundin being better than Alfredsson? Such a silly remark, clearly that is no true. I know how hard it is to get Leafs tickets. Sens tickets are expensive too, but easier to get. I could have gone to a game this year, but I had school work to do :(. I did go to a pre-season game though, against Pittsburgh. Saw Sidney Crosby. :) -- Earl Andrew - talk 05:55, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
- Ha! Hasek is pretty good, although lately he is been sucking in the shoot outs. I noticed on your user page you have only been to one NHL game? That's unfortunate, maybe if you went to more games you would realize the Leafs are not the team that you should cheer for ;-) -- Earl Andrew - talk 05:00, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
- Yes, the 67's suck this year. However, that bugs my mom more than it bugs me, as she is a die-hard 67's fan. However, don't bash Kilrea, he is a very good coach :-D -- Earl Andrew - talk 03:57, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
- Clutch, smlutch. A good player makes the players around him look good too. Not something Sundin can do. -- Earl Andrew - talk 06:30, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
- Sweden Shmweden. We're talking about the Leafs and how lousy they are. Sweden be damned ;-) Besides, I dont think Sundin's even going to play this time. -- Earl Andrew - talk 06:40, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
- Hey, lay off of Koivu, he had cancer. It would make more sense to bring in Naslund though. He sucks too :-D -- Earl Andrew - talk 07:08, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
- Maybe not, but he will this year, making your point moot. In fact, he will probably get more points than either Naslund or Sundin have ever got. -- Earl Andrew - talk 07:37, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
- Kaberle and McCabe? WHO? That's right. Redden made the olympic team, whil McCabe is sitting on the taxi squad. Meanwhile, Chara almost won the Norris last year. Let's see a Leaf do that. BTW, Havlat and Bochenski do not play on the same line as Alfy. -- Earl Andrew - talk 08:06, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
- I said international play not, Olympic team qualifications. Clearly the people who know hockey the best know that McCabe is just a fluke. Either that or they know it would be bad for national unity to have a Maple Leaf on the team. -- Earl Andrew - talk 08:15, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
- I have a better idea, let's agree to disagree :) -- Earl Andrew - talk 08:21, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
- Ha! With any luck, we won't have to play you in the playoffs :) -- Earl Andrew - talk 08:42, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
RfA
Thank you for your support in my request for adminship. I was promoted with a final tally of 31/1/1. Please don't hesitate to contact me if there is anything I can assist. --BorgQueen 22:15, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
Delete
Could you please delete my user page for me, I prefer reading Wikipedia as opposed to editing it. LMA 03:55, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
Template:User plagiarism
I was wondering if it would be more beneficial to change your "Template:User plagiarism" userbox to better resemble templates such as "Template:user RV War" and "Template:User copyright". What do you think? Morgan695 20:42, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
Wickenheiser
Thanks for the correction...it sounded really fishy to me too, I was just looking it up...If you'll see what the previous user wrote before me, you could see my problems with paring it down :p Habsfannova 04:59, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the Welcome, I'm now at 50+ edits
hope that you keep up all the good work you've been doing on Wikipedia Mr. Creativity 06:25, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
Kilrea
Is that some kind of threat? :-D Right now I am more interested in the loopy Terry Kilrea than his uncle ;-) -- Earl Andrew - talk 06:30, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
- Well, just to let you know, I was very threatened :-D. Hey, how about team Canada winning gold? I'm just about to add the leading scorers to the 2006 Juniors article. -- Earl Andrew - talk 06:35, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
- Hahaha, I oughta stick a {{NPOV}} tag on your user page for your Leaf-bias ;-) -- Earl Andrew - talk 06:49, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
- What fools! Clearly, the greatest hockey player of all time is Darryl Sitler ;-) -- Earl Andrew - talk 07:11, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
- Of course I was joking about Sitler :-D -- Earl Andrew - talk 07:26, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
- LOL! Nice user box :-p -- Earl Andrew - talk 07:27, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, just looking at the player pages I just linked to on the juniors page :). It wont be the first time I did something at the exact same time as someone else on Wikipedia. -- Earl Andrew - talk 07:31, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
- hahaha, didn't see you there :-p. Hey check this out: [1]
- Yeah, just looking at the player pages I just linked to on the juniors page :). It wont be the first time I did something at the exact same time as someone else on Wikipedia. -- Earl Andrew - talk 07:31, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
- LOL! Nice user box :-p -- Earl Andrew - talk 07:27, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
- Of course I was joking about Sitler :-D -- Earl Andrew - talk 07:26, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
- What fools! Clearly, the greatest hockey player of all time is Darryl Sitler ;-) -- Earl Andrew - talk 07:11, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
- Hahaha, I oughta stick a {{NPOV}} tag on your user page for your Leaf-bias ;-) -- Earl Andrew - talk 06:49, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
Freaky shit. Check out the shots on goal! -- Earl Andrew - talk 07:56, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, imagine facing 133 shots! He saved 83 of them too! Hey, didn't Ron Tugnutt do that? :) -- Earl Andrew - talk 08:09, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
- Wow, that Armenian goalie would have set an NHL record! There would have been a number of other NHL records broken in that came too though! -- Earl Andrew - talk 08:16, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
- Your last question is lacking a very important pronoun. :-p -- Earl Andrew - talk 08:24, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
- I dunno. I guess I just love the wiki so much :) -- Earl Andrew - talk 08:29, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
- No, that should go to SimonP! You know, he is the #1 contributor for Wikipedia and he is from Ottawa! GO SENS GO! ;-) He was written about in the paper an everything. To be fair, he went to school in Toronto. And you know why he makes so many edits? He's unemployed! I'm doing pretty well for a guy who has a part time job and university, eh? But seriously, I think I owe Jimbo some money, not the otherway around. Look at all the bandwidth I've taken up! -- Earl Andrew - talk 08:37, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
- Last I checked, Ottawa was in the same hemisphere as Kitchener :) -- Earl Andrew - talk 08:44, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
- Kitchener, Fergus same dif ;-) -- Earl Andrew - talk 08:52, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
My RfA
Hi, I know you said I didn't have to, but... I just want to say thanks for supporting me on my request for adminship! It passed by a 58/3/0 margin, so I am now an administrator. If you need me to help you out, or you find that I'm doing anything wrong, please don't hesitate to contact me. --Idont Havaname (Talk) 20:20, 6 January 2006 (UTC) |
RfA thanks from rogerd
Hi Croat Canuck- Thanks for your support on my RfA. I appreciate the kind words that you used in your comments. If I can be of any service please leave me a message --rogerd 01:25, 13 January 2006 (UTC)