User talk:Cote d'Azur/Archive 4

This is an archive of past discussions about User:Cote d'Azur. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Glamorama Spies

The article Glamorama Spies has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No assertion of notability. Searches turned up zero on all but Books, where it gets a trivial mention in this source, and then only a single other listing mention in another.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:14, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Sibelius navbox

I don't quite see why we need a navbox for his symphonies which are all in his general navbox? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:22, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

The {{Sibelius symphonies}} is much older than {{Jean Sibelius}}. There are many similar (symphonies) templates; they don't disturb, I think... Cote d'Azur (talk) 21:44, 25 July 2016 (UTC)