User talk:Cote d'Azur/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

→

Archive 5

Image copyright problem with Image:Ferrero.JPG

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Ferrero.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takescopyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and thesource of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tagto the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. (ESkog)^(Talk) 14:52, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Your Question

If you received it electronically, then it should be in your computer somewhere. What you would have to do is upload it by clicking the "upload file" link in the leftside navigation bar, and follow the listed steps. Let me know if you have further questions.Wizardman 23:15, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Image without license

Unspecified source for Image:Ferrero.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Ferrero.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed atWikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (perWikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:26, 24 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice?--MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs •Owner)} 18:26, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 14:09, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

January 2009

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Art Bergmann. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article'stalk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use thesandbox. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 00:52, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Vandalism, are you kidding ? I only changed his birthday from 1954 to 1953, according to his wife who claims he was born on February 8, 1953 (and has his birth certificate to prove it). Cote d'Azur 06:45, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Sardanapalus

Quote:

• E. H. Coleridge, in his notes on the works of Byron, states, "It is hardly necessary to remind the modern reader that the Sardanapalus of history is an unverified if not an unverifiable personage.... The character which Ctesias depicted or invented, an effeminate debauchee, sunk in luxury and sloth, who at the last was driven to take up arms, and, after a prolonged but ineffectual resistance, avoided capture by suicide, cannot be identified."

Is he historical enough for our list? -- Jack of Oz ... speak! ... 08:13, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Your decision, I leave it up to you, but it would be nice to have him Cote d'Azur 08:49, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot(talk) 17:13, 9 May 2010 (UTC)