User talk:NaomiAmethyst/Archives/2012/December

subject

Da panda of pandemonium has given you a kitten! Kittens promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Your kitten must be fed three times a day and will be your faithful companion forever! Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a kitten, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

Spread the goodness of kittens by adding {{subst:Kitten}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or kittynap their kitten with {{subst:Kittynap}}

This is urgent support! I need to say how awesome you are at Wikipedia! Thank you for making this a realiable site. Hug da panda. DPandaOPande (talk) 16:31, 8 December 2012 (UTC)DPandaOPande

Most popular aliens known...

The most popular alien is NMD because they are Antiqous (Aliens) and also best friends. They have been created by a very strong alien called master Bandow which is now defeationg the king of all aliens named aistion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.219.112.161 (talk) 01:20, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

ClueBot NG must go!!!

Listen up git, I heard you run ClueBot NG eh? Well I have bone to pick with this so called 'bot'. This automated piece of rubbish is ruining Wikipedia by blocking legitimate edits. I am currently leading the petitions to get rid of ClueBot NG for which, by the way, support is mounting fast. I love helping Wikipedia out by sharing my wealth of knowledge on the lower leagues of British football (or 'soccer' to you yanks), however I am now absolutely fuming at the way in which I have treated by this ridiculously strict 'bot', which will block any (and I mean any) perfectly legitimate information I so kindly donate to Wikipedia. I have a wealth of knowledge on the field of lower league footballers and lesser known teams, information which, if allowed to share, would significantly improve the current appalling state of Wikipedia's pages on lower league English football. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Boomage (talk • contribs) 22:06, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Firstly, assume good faith and be civil and don't attack other editors, and secondly, this diatribe is utterly useless. What you need to do is actually provide links to relevant discussion (this so-called petition) and relevant diffs (changes) where the bot has wrongly reverted an edit.

I have taken the liberty of looking at your talk page, and noted that ClueBot NG only started reverting your edits after you were previously warned several times and then blocked by human editors for similar editing. This is a decent indication that the bot is just enforcing the same standards as the Wikipedia community does.

I believe that you are acting in good faith, in that you are doing what you believe to be best for the project, but please, if you get reverted by a human editor, discuss the changes on the talk page, and don't edit war.

I hope you have a Merry Christmas. -- Cobi^(t|c|b) 09:26, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. - Rich(MTCD)^T|C|E-Mail 14:20, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Technical Barnstar
	For those clue bots IanMurrayWeb (talk) 01:11, 28 December 2012 (UTC)