Jump to content

User talk:Clarkcj12/Archive 7

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 5Archive 6Archive 7Archive 8Archive 9Archive 10

Ballinskelligs

What have i done wrong i am new to this ...all i did was mention that Ballinskelligs is a point of view off the Ring of kerry ...and i think it is as i live here and it is where the monks lived after they left Skellig Michael God Bless oshmb — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oshmb (talkcontribs) 08:39, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Award 4 U

awarded to Clarkcj12 for joining the 10,000 Edit Club
Vjmlhds (talk) 20:59, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi , The Price for Democracy,marked for deletion is a project of person who did this film but doesn't speak English and I'm trying to help him out.It's a first time us using Wikipedia.Thank you for understanding.Olga Frey (talk) 11:02, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Email

Hello, Clarkcj12. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Mike VTalk 20:58, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Which images ?

Hi There. In reference to your note re: OTRS ticket 2014050510012415, I can't see any deleted images. I thought I'd restored the last one a couple of days ago when the uploader told me they'd sent the OTRS email. Am I missing one ? - Peripitus (Talk) 21:35, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Mudvayne genre

Hello. I noticed that you've been reverting changes made by people who've been restoring the genres to the Mudvayne pages. Yes that guy is giving sources, but he's cherry picking them. There are just as many if not more sources stating that Mudvayne belong to one of the other genres there, some of which are on the main Mudvayne page. He picked the links that support his position and ignored the others. Also, notice the actual links: He keeps using the same 3 links even if they have nothing to do with the song or album in question. Two of them are dead and one of them is just based on a line from a photo caption. I can easily link to working articles from Allmusic and Popmatters that support them being a nu-metal link. For now I think it's best that we leave the genre tags out of the album pages and just use the generic "metal" label in the descriptions until people can agree on what should be done. Right now it's just one person on a crusade to remove any hint of Mudvayne being considered nu-metal (and he's doing the same thing on TV Tropes). SonOfPlisskin (talk) 01:30, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi,I don't understand why my name is in red not blue like it was before. I also sent you a mssg about 'The Price of Democracy" article.I'm just helping someone and have very slow progress...Sorry if I'm doing something wrong...(Olga Frey (talk) 10:43, 9 May 2014 (UTC))

Wikidata weekly summary #109

revert in 'racism in association football'

Hello Clarkcj12! Just read your reply to the reverting in the racism in football article. Unfortunately it took a while to see that you had answered, since it's not on this talk page anymore and mine is/was only temporary. I was a bit upset that you understood my removal as a vandalism attempt, but since reading your recent reply, I understand (and think it's good advice) that editing from a temporary account and without a consensus discussion about a sensitive matter will lead to that impression.

I've decided to follow your advice and add to the commentary of another user complaining on the talk page and saw that more readers have complained about the article quality - so you're right: A hands-on mentality may be OK in my line of work, but it's an open community and we need to openly discuss and minimally agree before taking action. Thanks for taking the time to write on that day and to reply in the meantime! Take care! --217.189.199.116 (talk) 22:54, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Greenwich Village Story, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Hogan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Genetics. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #110

Wikidata weekly summary #111

Wikidata weekly summary #112

Wikidata weekly summary #113

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Aviation accidents and incidents in 2014. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #114

Wikidata weekly summary #115

I'm a jerk

Ur looking fine today — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pattyg69 (talkcontribs) 01:59, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Your edit summary on Kaushik

Your edit summary on Kaushik says that you reverted for "unexplained content removal." The removal was explained, so the summary is not quite accurate. However, as I am not familiar with the article, they may be in good faith or vandalism. Thanks Piguy101 (talk) 01:56, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know I didn't see the edit summary, for the edit. Go ahead and roll me back. Though I would always suggest that if you would like to remove such a large section to leave a comment on the talk page to discuss it or bring it up for WP:RfC so the community can help decided. Its really helpful to do if you aren't quite familiar with the topic or area. --Clarkcj12 (talk) 02:04, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi, I'm the one that deleted the two sections. Those two sections were about the Hindu god Indra, who has absolutely nothing with the subject of the article. I can only assume that someone accidentally copied the two sections from some other article, perhaps the article on Indra. 69.248.132.69 (talk) 02:07, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Yes, I can confirm that they were copied and pasted from the Indra article. Look at the first two sections of the Indra article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indra 69.248.132.69 (talk) 02:09, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me, know. I am sorry about that. I have since restored your edit. --Clarkcj12 (talk) 02:11, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
It appears that Cluebot has done the same edit [1] that Clarkcj12 did, so I have reported the false positive. Piguy101 (talk) 02:33, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #116

Wikidata weekly summary #117

Wikidata weekly summary #118

Please comment on Talk:Great power

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Great power. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #119

Wikidata weekly summary #120

Wikidata weekly summary #121

Wikidata weekly summary #122

Wikidata weekly summary #114

Wikidata weekly summary #123