User talk:Chrisgdclarke

Your draft article, Draft:Radiology Cafe

Hello, Chrisgdclarke. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Radiology Cafe".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. TKK! bark with me! 14:43, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Radiology Cafe logo small.png

Thanks for uploading File:Radiology Cafe logo small.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:30, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Radiology Cafe logo small.png

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 17:59, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Radiology Cafe logo small.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Radiology Cafe logo small.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Royal College of Radiologists logo.png

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:06, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest editing

Hello, Chrisgdclarke. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:31, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Chrisgdclarke. As the creator/owner/operator of RadiologyCafe you have a clear conflict of interest with respect to anything written about it on Wikipedia, and you really shouldn't be trying to add articles about it to Wikipedia, or adding any content about it or yourself to other existing Wikipedia articles.{[pb}}When you requested that the draft be restored here at WP:REFUND, you did not state your conflict of interest at all. If you had done so, Graeme Bartlett who reviewed your request may have still restored the draft for you to work on, but he most likely would've strongly suggested that you submit it to Wikipedia:Articles for creation for review instead of moving it the article namespace yourself. Now, that you've done the latter, you basically have no final say or editorial control over the article as explained in Wikipedia:Ownership of content and are going to expected to follow Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide by other editors.

It's also unclear as to whether your COI would be considered to be financial one since the creator/owner/operator of the website. If the consensus is that you do have a financial COI, then not only are you subject to Wikipedia's more general COI guidelines, but you are going to be expect to comply with Wikipedia's policy on paid-contributions. I'm going to start a discussion about this at WP:COIN#RadiologyCafe to see what some other editors think. This is only being done to clarify the nature of your COI since knowing which policy applies to you will help you better understand what you need to do to avoid any problems when you edit. You're more that welcome to participate in the discussion and clarify things if you wish. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:39, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of RadiologyCafe for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article RadiologyCafe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RadiologyCafe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:10, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]