User talk:Chowhonwai

Chowhonwai, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Chowhonwai! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. We hope to see you there!

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 01:50, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band (song) was changed by Chowhonwai (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.8539 on 2012-10-02T07:07:48+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:07, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds

Please avoid redirects. Your change from double tracking to doubletracking introduces an extra redirect. Also, it is not necessary to uncapitalize the first letter if it does not show in the article. [[Double tracking|doubletracked]] is just as good as [[double tracking|doubletracked]]. Unnecessary edits take up server storage. Thanks for your contributions. Jim1138 (talk) 07:21, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Mr T ^(Talk?) ^{(New thread?)} 09:23, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Jimi Hendrix, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Cresix (talk) 14:54, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band was changed by Chowhonwai (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.926383 on 2012-10-08T11:35:29+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:35, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring against multiple editors at Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band. You're also excessively overlinking and providing trivial details. But the most important thing is that you're just making changes over and over again without trying to discuss them. After your block has expired, go to the article's talk page and try to reach consensus.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Qwyrxian (talk) 14:23, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Cresix (talk) 16:14, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. - Barek (talk • contribs) - 15:59, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2013

Why don't you find something better to do? Evanh2008 ^{(talk|contribs)} 10:10, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Evanh2008 ^{(talk|contribs)} 11:19, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Evanh2008 ^{(talk|contribs)} 11:38, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 16:25, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]