User talk:Chen Wenyuan

Please note that I have nominated Template:Orgban for speedy deletion as a template which blatantly misrepresents policy. GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 19:50, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Template:Orgban, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 20:03, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

You created an account, made a template with your first edit, then logged out and - as an IP - added the template to several editors? You knew what you were doing, and you took steps to avoid getting caught. Blocked. TFOWR 20:08, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Future Perfect at Sunrise, and too other admins, my intention of creating and adding this template to users was trying to solve problem with persistent policy violators which return here consistently seeing no alternative, by showing them original research alternative, namely http://www.wikinfo.org I see that my way to solve this here was not accepted, can you implement redirecting of these unwanted users to http://www.wikinfo.org in accord with your policies-I don't know how to do it properly, maybe include link to wikinfo into existing templates? Chen Wenyuan (talk) 08:39, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So basically you're saying you're not only deliberately misrepresenting consensus and trying to hide those actions by logging off to post the template you created, you're also attempting to use the template to spam? GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 08:41, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You call it spam, but my intention was to drive off problematic users from Wikipedia in effective way, in this case this so called spam will result only in lowering of vandalism level in Wikipedia, because these unwanted editors will have alternative, especially when they are wikiholics. Chen Wenyuan (talk) 08:44, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:OUT. GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 08:45, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I propose you to make at least one WP:OUT template to use it in userpages of unwanted users. I can't find here no one such template. Chen Wenyuan (talk) 08:50, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see the need to do so; simply linking to WP:OUT with an explanatory note is fine. GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 08:53, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]