User talk:Catieinsightdesigns

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

Catieinsightdesigns (talk · contribs) has been paid by Insight Designs Web Solutions on behalf of Cocona Inc. Their editing has included contributions to this article.

Catieinsightdesigns (talk) 20:12, 20 November 2015 (UTC) Catie[reply]

Thanks for the heads up, WikiDan61. Did I take care of this particular issue? Catieinsightdesigns (talk) 20:24, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Catieinsightdesigns, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 16:27, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

Catieinsightdesigns (talk · contribs) has been paid by Insight Designs Web Solutions on behalf of Cocona Inc.. Their editing has included contributions to this article. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregory_W._Haggquist

Catieinsightdesigns (talk) 20:23, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Paid contributions

Based on your username, and the existence of a Web marketing firm named Insight Designs in Denver (the hometown of Haggquists 37.5 company), I am going to work on the assumption that you have been paid to create Gregory W. Haggquist, Ph.D.. Please note that you are required to disclose this relationship. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 16:27, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for addressing that (both here and at the article talk page). WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 13:02, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 37.5 TM Technology (November 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:37.5 TM Technology and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 22:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cocona Inc. (November 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikiisawesome was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Catieinsightdesigns/sandbox/Cocona Inc. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

/wia /tlk 21:18, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Catieinsightdesigns, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! /wia /tlk 21:18, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gregory W. Haggquist for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gregory W. Haggquist is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gregory W. Haggquist until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 23:41, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can you give an explanation why you moved this from Draft to main space without any review ? It will now be subjected to the article for deletion process which it was protected from as a draft. Perhaps not a wonderfully good idea ? Velella ^{Velella Talk} 23:44, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hooray! You created your Teahouse profile!

	Welcome to the Teahouse Badge
	Awarded to editors who have introduced themselves at the Wikipedia Teahouse. Guest editors with this badge show initiative and a great drive to learn how to edit Wikipedia. Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges
Thank you for introducing yourself and contributing to Wikipedia! If you have any questions feel free to drop me a line at my talk page. Happy Editing! ~ Anastasia [Missionedit] (talk) 18:52, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Good to be here! Apologies if my formatting is all screwed up; am still learning the markup language. :-) Catieinsightdesigns (talk) 19:33, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 37.5 TM Technology (December 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:37.5 TM Technology and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:23, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:37.5 TM Technology concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:37.5 TM Technology, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 22:11, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Catieinsightdesigns/sandbox/Cocona Inc.

Hello, Catieinsightdesigns. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "sandbox/Cocona Inc.".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Lakun.patra (talk) 10:17, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:37.5 TM Technology

Hello, Catieinsightdesigns. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "37.5 TM Technology".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Puffin ^{Let's talk!} 14:33, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]