User talk:Casecase3015

Nothing is being manipulated. Facts are facts. The most dominant span by either team was listed. 17-3 is more dominant than 20-6. The win % of 17-3 is 85%. The win % of 20-6 is 76%.

Clearly 17-3 represents the most dominant span in this rivalry’s history. 20-6 represents nothing and is meaningless.

November 2018

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to LSU Tigers football, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. UW Dawgs (talk) 23:11, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive edits while logged out

Hello, Casecase3015, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you.

Specifically, Special:Contributions/98.6.157.194 is making DE edits which are identical to your DE edits. UW Dawgs (talk) 18:45, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion link

You may wish to read Wikipedia:Articles for deletion which describes the process by which articles can be removed. I've tagged the LSU–Texas A&M football rivalry article as being insufficiently sourced, but am not taking a position on whether the article's topic meets WP:GNG requirements. UW Dawgs (talk) 18:52, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Casecase3015: I strongly encourage you to read Wikipedia:Articles for deletion which outlines the process by which the LSU–Texas A&M football rivalry article can be deleted, and therefore achieves your apparent goal of removal of the corresponding section from the LSU Tigers football article. Simply blanking that rivalry section on the LSU Tigers football article,[1] which is both cited and links to the stand-alone article, will not result in removal. UW Dawgs (talk) 23:14, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at LSU Tigers football. UW Dawgs (talk) 23:14, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Alexf^(talk) 14:22, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:08, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Block notice

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 20:40, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Because of continued disruption and behavior despite two previous administrative actions taken upon you, your block has been set to 'indefinite'. This will require you to formally file an unblock appeal and request, discuss your continued behavior with an administrator, acknowledge the issues and disruption, and agree to any conditions before you'll be allowed to edit. Thanks - ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 20:42, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]