This user is taking a wikibreak and may be away or inactive for varying periods of time.
Although they may occasionally be able to do some editing, messages left for them may not be replied to for a while.
They will be back on Wikipedia when school is over.
This is Cnzx's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.
Hello, Cnzx. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello Cnzx, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Stephen Dure, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article claims coverage in reliable sources. If you are interested in learning more about how speedy deletion works, I have compiled a list of helpful pages at User:SoWhy/SDA. You can of course also contact me if you have questions. Thank you. SoWhy13:57, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi SoWhy, and thanks for the notification. I don't have access to the edit history of the page anymore, but if I remember correctly I tagged it under multiple criterion. Another administrator seems to have deleted it under the second criteria. —cnzx (talk • contribs)04:22, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No, you just tagged it as A7 which was incorrect since the article contained a link to [1], an article in a reliable source covering the subject in some detail. I'm not sure why RHaworth deleted it as G10 later, considering that it contained no BLP violating material. I have asked them about it. Regards SoWhy10:22, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A page you started (Valborg Stoud Platou) has been reviewed!
Wikipedia editor Babymissfortune just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Happy holidays! Babymissfortune is wishing you a MerryChristmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas6}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
To reply, leave a comment on Babymissfortune's talk page.
Hello, the article 72nd Group Army has a sentence which claims that the the army is positioned to invade Taiwan, however, there is no citation to support such claim, That is why i removed it. The claim is a very essential part of the article, if it is not valid, the whole article would be misleading. Please tell me, what is your rationale? ----損齋 (talk) 17:27, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@損齋: I'm sorry, I could've sworn that I looked up the 72nd Group Army and got multiple references to Taiwan. Obviously I didn't -- I've reverted myself. —cnzx (talk • contribs)22:54, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your feedback. I would appreciate if you share with me the reason you nominated again the page for delation. Your thought is very welcomed. Cheers and happy new year. Philipo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kolefon (talk • contribs) 05:44, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Just wanted to say thanks for catching that Gavin Munro wasn't really needed. I started the page in my sandbox as his page and then recently realised that it not about Gavin. So mistakenly just split the info into two pages his and the companies. It's much better idea to just have the company's page. So long story short Thanks for reviewing and sorting it out. Blackash (talk) 11:41, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
@Blackash: glad to be of help, and thank you for creating those articles. —cnzx (talk • contribs)16:52, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Both Tonelli-Shanks and Cipolla's modular square root algorithms can handle powers of prime modula (not just primes)
I looked up Dickson's History of Numbers vol 1 p215(Tonelli) and p218(Cipolla) and Dickson clearly shows that both modular square root algorithms can handle powers of prime modula (whereas the Wiki articles say they can only do prime modula).
I've updated the TALK pages of both articles with the relevant Dickson math, along with numeric runthroughs with Mathematica code.
However, I am not a professional mathematician so I hesitate to update the articles.
Perhaps yourself, or someone else in the Computer science field could update the relevant articles with this information from Dickson.
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:11, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Cnzx. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello, Cnzx. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Thanks for uploading File:New ClamAV Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
I hope this message finds you well! My name is Scott, and I work with a project called SCALES, out of Northwestern University (https://scales-okn.org). We recently received a grant from the National Science Foundation to create a national resource for enabling access to court records and increasing the transparency of the justice system. Here's a paper we published recently in Science discussing the goals of our project, as well as an introductory video.
As you've contributed to the Supreme Court cases WikiProject, I wanted to reach out and inquire into how this SCALES corpus might be useful to you as an editor. We have a great deal of data and metadata about cases in the federal court system that could improve lots of stubs and B-/C-class articles (something I'm personally excited about, since in my brief teenage Wikipedia-editing heyday I was often drawn to working with stubs and new articles...) And in general, I think the SCALES platform will be a powerful tool for empowering citizens to understand the judiciary and its impact on the country, a priority I know many of us share in this topic space.
Let me know if you're interested in talking further and helping us understand how we can work with you. Thanks for your time!
.jpg)
