User talk:Carld307

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Carld307/sandbox

Hello Carld307,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged User:Carld307/sandbox for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Djembayz (talk) 03:05, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Djembayz, Can you please tell me how/why you consider the article promotional? I'd be happy to rewrite but would like to know beforehand what seems promotional. Paragraph 1 is boilerplate simply telling who New Pig is and what's it's become. It's true; it's factual. Paragraphs 2, 3, 4 tells how & why the product was invented and how the company got its name. This answers the number one question on everyone's mind, "Where did the pig name come from?" So doesn't it makes sense to include that information? Paragraphs 5 & 6 describe the company's growth over 30 years. Again only facts, not promotion. By the way, the article is patterned after another Pennsylvania company on Wikipedia, Mine Safety Appliances, which tells about its company's history, products and growth. Isn't this similar to what we tried to do? So please let me know what should be done to make the article less promotional and acceptable for Wikipedia. Thanks for your help and consideration in this matter. Carld307 (talk) 18:40, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Carld307/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 18:36, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Carld307, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 18:36, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: New Pig (September 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kethrus was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:New Pig and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

--I am Kethrus ^{Talk to me!} 23:32, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question

Hello, Carld307! I'm Wikiisawesome. I have replied to your question about a submission at the WikiProject Articles for Creation Help Desk. /wia /tlk 00:21, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: New Pig (November 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:New Pig and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 21:41, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: New Pig (December 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:New Pig and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 23:31, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As per previous instructions, added verifiable, reliable sources

What am I missing? Is it quantity? I can add more reliable sources if that's the problem. Is it quality? Please provide more specific direction. Thank you. Carld307 (talk) 17:03, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:New Pig concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:New Pig, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:New Pig

Hello, Carld307. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "New Pig".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Puffin ^{Let's talk!} 10:21, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]