User talk:CaliforniaNorman

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CaliforniaNorman (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

How was I insulting myself? I am not VermontJohn. He is a totally separate person. CaliforniaNorman (talk) 03:10, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Evidence clearly says otherwise. RickinBaltimore (talk) 13:37, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Seems TPA should be revoked. - Mlpearc (open channel) 03:13, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done, but as I already reviewed one of the unblock requests, I'll leave the decline to another admin. --Yamla (talk) 12:12, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CaliforniaNorman (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Phil Knight, I was joining the battle against sock puppetry. No one ever told me that standing against sock puppets was wrong. If it is wrong, then I didn't get a warning. If it's not wrong, then you and everyone else who fights against sock puppets should also be banned from editing wikipedia. CaliforniaNorman (talk) 01:23, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Insulting yourself is not "standing against sock puppets". Huon (talk) 01:43, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CaliforniaNorman (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

How was I aware that I was doing something wrong? CaliforniaNorman (talk) 23:14, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Did you honestly believe that this was appropriate behavior? PhilKnight (talk) 23:47, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CaliforniaNorman (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I wasn't aware that I made an error. I humbly request a second chance.

Decline reason:

You were clearly aware. Yamla (talk) 12:52, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What error are you talking about? Max Semenik (talk) 09:01, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

CaliforniaNorman, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi CaliforniaNorman! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:07, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/CarolinaPete, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

FyzixFighter (talk) 01:39, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FyzixFighter, you really don't have any evidence to prove sockpuppetry. Please drop your investigation immediately. In this country, one has to be proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. I can give you one reasonable doubt right here: it's all a coincidence. Remember, Jesus said to turn the other cheek.

March 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:37, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]