Jump to content

User talk:CMtemCA

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

[edit]
Hi CMtemCA! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 23:28, Tuesday, June 23, 2020 (UTC)

Help me!

[edit]

Please help me with... how to respond to a comment in Teahouse. I am a brand-new user trying my first edit. I posted a question == How to change article title? == in Teahouse about Hank (textile) which I have changed to Hank (unit of measure). I also fixed the Disambiguation page. I would now like to know whether I need to add a reference to support the statement about the use of the word hank in the meat industry, or if it is sufficient that a reference appears in the linked article Sausage_casing. What are the mechanics of continuing the comments in the original posting in Teahouse? Do I edit the posting or is there some other procedure? Thank you! CMtemCA (talk) 20:54, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! You can go to the Wikipedia:Teahouse, find the How to change article title? section header, and click the "Edit" or "Edit source" link next to the section header. Then type your response, sign your post with the four tildes, and click [Publish changes]. Happy editing! GoingBatty (talk) 21:01, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi CMtemCA! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, How to change article title?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

[edit]

Please help me with... I have made some changes to Marilyn Bailey Ogilvie and have some questions. Are the sources I found (Refs 2 and 3) OK? Are they sufficient to remove the tag regarding single source? In the Publications list, I added her most recent book using the Visual Editor, but I noticed that the links to ISBN and the ISBN number were not inserted. Do I need to do that using Edit Source following the format for the other entries? Please let me know of any other suggestions. I'm new at this! Thanks. CMtemCA (talk) 23:30, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the {{single source}} tag and replaced it with {{BLP sources}}. The referencing for the article remains woefully bad and large chunks might need to be removed for lack of sources.
Using the Visual Editor in the way you did is fine – you have to work within its limitations. I don't know how the 'nowiki' tags ended up around the ISBN, but I'll fix that by using the {{ISBN}} template instead.
Note that the link to her faculty page has gone bad; we need to either find a new one or try to add an archive link.
I'll watch this page for a while to see if you undertake any more fixes. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 03:18, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

[edit]

Please help me with... following up on Marilyn Bailey Ogilvie Thanks to jmcgnh for your help so far. I'm not sure how to continue the conversation with you directly. I found some information on Marilyn's family (children and former spouse) at https://prabook.com/web/marilyn_bailey.ogilvie/3478489. Is Prabook a valid source? It also supports some of the other information in the Wikipedia article. I also found the family information in a Washington Post obituary of her former husband. How would I cite that article in the Infobox? There is no other information of interest in the obituary. Finally, in the list of her books, I linked the name Margaret Norse Nice in the first book title to the corresponding Wikipedia article. Is that OK? CMtemCA (talk) 23:47, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just reply to the message, no need to use the {{help me}} template again or to create a new section.
To do this the 'right' way, you would use a template like {{reply|username}} so the user will most likely receive a notification that you were talking to them, but - as I said - I'll be watching this page for a while so it's not strictly required that you do anything extra.
Prabook, to all appearances, is user-generated content and a dead end for following up on where they get their information, so, no, it would not be considered a suitable source.
Obituaries can be used as sources, just like any other newspaper or magazine article, but their uses are fairly limited and it depends on who appears to have written them. When mainly written by family members, they are insufficiently independent and not known to be fact checked.
To my mind, there should never be references in an infobox. An infobox is intended to summarize material already present in the body of the article and the references should be there.
I would recommend not inserting wikilinks into book titles. If the subject is worth linking, then it's worth a sentence somewhere where the person can be mentioned and linked. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 01:10, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

{{reply|jmcgnh}}OK - I'm trying the template just for practice. I agree with you about Prabook - it definitely looked "iffy" to me. The obituary in the Washington Post was written by someone on their staff, so I used it and added a sentence to the Biography section to connect the source to. I also added a paragraph connecting the theme of women in science to the book titles and used the wikilinks there instead of in the book titles. I have been trying without success to find more good sources on Marilyn Ogilvie. Any suggestions? I started working on this article because I found it in the Task Center and I wanted to get more comfortable with how Wikipedia works before tackling anything more complex. But I don't want to make a "career" of fixing this one article! Thanks again for your help.CMtemCA (talk) 20:04, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

{{reply|jmcgnh}}Regarding Marilyn Bailey Ogilvie I found the article Wikipedia:Notability (academics) which indicates that Notability can be established at least to some extent by the number of libraries holding the person's books according to WorldCat, so I put in a reference with that information. Is that sufficient? CMtemCA (talk) 23:20, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

CMtemCA, Sorry, you did something strange with the reply template so it took me a while to get around to looking back here.

Yes, library holdings of books can be an element for academic notability and WorldCat can be used to demonstrate it. Whether it's 'sufficient' is hard to say, since I've found there are unwritten rules around academic notability and some very experienced editors see notability in places where I don't.

But I don't think we're arguing about whether the notability threshold has been met. Instead, we're trying to make sure that all of the facts about Ogilvie in the article can be verified from published, reliable sources - preferably independent ones. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 01:35, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Jmcgnh: OK, I read up a little on templates, so please let me know if this is correct (and if not, what I did wrong). Regarding Marilyn Bailey Ogilvie I think the sources are all good now. The only thing I couldn't find in a reliable source is her date of birth (March 22, 1936). The full date appears in the prabook.com listing, which I didn't use as a source per our previous discussion. The article about her being honored by the History of Science Society indicates that her 80th birthday was in 2016, so that supports the year 1936. Should I change it to just show the year? CMtemCA (talk) 20:47, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

CMtemCA, Yes, the notification worked this time.

Yes, I'm afraid the data in the article should reflect only what is available in the cited sources, so without a birthdate reference, you may be stuck with just the year. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 01:14, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Jmcgnh: I believe the article Marilyn Bailey Ogilvie is OK now. I rearranged the text a little to make it flow better, and I changed her birthdate to just the year. I also removed the maintenance templates. Let me know if there's anything else I should do. Thanks! CMtemCA (talk) 22:49, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi CMtemCA! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Editing articles on France, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 25 April 2021

[edit]

The Signpost: 27 June 2021

[edit]

The Signpost: 25 July 2021

[edit]

The Signpost: 29 August 2021

[edit]

The Signpost: 26 September 2021

[edit]

The Signpost: 31 October 2021

[edit]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 29 November 2021

[edit]

The Signpost: 28 December 2021

[edit]

The Signpost: 30 January 2022

[edit]

The Signpost: 27 February 2022

[edit]

The Signpost: 27 March 2022

[edit]

The Signpost: 24 April 2022

[edit]

The Signpost: 29 May 2022

[edit]

The Signpost: 26 June 2022

[edit]

The Signpost: 1 August 2022

[edit]

The Signpost: 31 August 2022

[edit]

The Signpost: 30 September 2022

[edit]

The Signpost: 31 October 2022

[edit]

The Signpost: 28 November 2022

[edit]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 1 January 2023

[edit]

The Signpost: 16 January 2023

[edit]

The Signpost: 4 February 2023

[edit]

The Signpost: 20 February 2023

[edit]

The Signpost: 9 March 2023

[edit]

The Signpost: 20 March 2023

[edit]

The Signpost: 03 April 2023

[edit]

The Signpost: 26 April 2023

[edit]

Ref errors

[edit]

In your edit to Leana Wen, you removed ref definitions that are used in remaining parts of the article. Scroll down to the ref section to see the errors. Please recover the refs you removed and add them back to the article, thanks. Schazjmd (talk) 18:54, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 8 May 2023

[edit]

The Signpost: 22 May 2023

[edit]

The Signpost: 5 June 2023

[edit]

The Signpost: 19 June 2023

[edit]

The Signpost: 3 July 2023

[edit]

The Signpost: 17 July 2023

[edit]

The Signpost: 1 August 2023

[edit]

The Signpost: 15 August 2023

[edit]

The Signpost: 31 August 2023

[edit]

The Signpost: 16 September 2023

[edit]

The Signpost: 3 October 2023

[edit]

The Signpost: 23 October 2023

[edit]

The Signpost: 6 November 2023

[edit]

The Signpost: 20 November 2023

[edit]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 4 December 2023

[edit]

The Signpost: 24 December 2023

[edit]

The Signpost: 10 January 2024

[edit]

The Signpost: 31 January 2024

[edit]

The Signpost: 13 February 2024

[edit]

The Signpost: 2 March 2024

[edit]

The Signpost: 29 March 2024

[edit]

The Signpost: 25 April 2024

[edit]

The Signpost: 16 May 2024

[edit]

The Signpost: 8 June 2024

[edit]

The Signpost: 4 July 2024

[edit]

The Signpost: 22 July 2024

[edit]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Covenant of Water, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Appachan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 14 August 2024

[edit]

The Signpost: 4 September 2024

[edit]

The Signpost: 26 September 2024

[edit]

The Signpost: 19 October 2024

[edit]

The Signpost: 6 November 2024

[edit]

The Signpost: 18 November 2024

[edit]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]