User talk:Brutalhovno

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Brutalhovno, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Aboutmovies (talk) 18:20, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Brutal Assault 2008 Poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Brutal Assault 2008 Poster.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 05:30, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Brutal Assault 2009 Poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Brutal Assault 2009 Poster.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 05:30, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Template:Squares in Bratislava, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia! Alpha Quadrant ^talk 00:57, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Brutal_Assault_2010_Poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Brutal_Assault_2010_Poster.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Melesse (talk) 04:18, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Brutal_Assault_2009_Poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Brutal_Assault_2009_Poster.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 04:18, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brutal_Assault_2007_Poster.jpg

I have tagged File:Brutal_Assault_2007_Poster.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 04:19, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your username

Hi Brutal... You did a lot for Slovak Wikiproject here on Wikipedia and your articles contribute to a better coverage of Slovakia at this part of the project. Thanks for that. ... Personally, I don't care too much about user names - I value good and competent editors and contributions and I'm not offended by usernames. However, as you know, your username means Brutalshit in English, and it is (in my opinion) really inappropriate name/nickname on a serious project like Wikipedia. It might appear offensive, inappropriate or immature to some people (fluent in Slovak) who comment or watch e. g. at the national project's talk page. Please, allow me to ask you one question: Would you mind to change your username to something less offensive? Don't take it as a civility lesson, it is just a friendly question. Best regards. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 12:20, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for noticing my contributions and thank you for your concern regarding my username. You are welcome to try to improve my Wikipedia edits in any way. At this point, I am not thinking about changing the username, even though it is definitely somewhat loaded. The name comes from an existing phenomenon I personally observed in the Czech Republic and it is not my creation. It is quite difficult to ascertain whether the expression "hovno" is inappropriate or not (it would even be hard to choose criteria for establishing its appropriateness - e.g. use of the word in Slovak-language or Czech-language media or some other criterion?). At this point, you are the only one who seems to care but if it ever becomes an issue obscuring my editing work, I would consider changing the name, of course. Best wishes Brutalhovno (talk) 12:49, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your answer. I asked because usernames containing the English pattern "shit" in a similar form (Brutalshit) are usually blocked immediatelly as "a blatant violation of our username policy, meaning that it is profane; threatens, attacks or impersonates another person". See for example this recent discussion. However, you are not a vandal and I don't think this little ~~childish~~ profanity is particularly harmful for Wikipedia :) Keep up the good work, and let me know if you need any help. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 13:59, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Slovak Ribbon of National Merit
		Hi there. So I'm not actually part of WikiProject Slovakia nor do I have much to do with Slovakia related articles, but I happened to notice your new article Parks and gardens in Bratislava and glanced at a few of your other contributions and just wanted to welcome and thank you for your excellent work here on a much needed subject. It's great to see so many quality new articles and I look forward to seeing more from you in the future. While I'm not a part of the project, I am BOLDly awarding this barnstar for your contributions. Happy editing! Zachlipton (talk) 09:46, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Slovakia

Thank you for the beer, sir! I would return the favor but it seems someone has already beaten me to the barnstar haha! As for assessment, the rules I have followed come from the Wikipedia:WikiProject Slovakia/Assessment page. This page displays the standard criteria for article quality from Wikipedia, with the bottom most chart the recommended importance scale for this specific project. When categorizing all the articles this is what I have always come back to to reassess the article if I was unsure of where it fit. I hope this helps! Demokratickid (talk) 11:46, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

---

Also, this may be a little late but nontheless:

We would like to invite you to join WikiProject Slovakia, an attempt to build and maintain a large and neutral database of Slovakia-related articles on Wikipedia. To join, simply add your name to the members section of WikiProject Slovakia. {{subst:4~}}

Demokratickid (talk) 02:21, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Medieval Bratislava

Hello Brutalhovno,

I perceive an earnest problem with the template "Medieval Bratislava" that you created last month ,regarding anachronism. Perhaps you are also aware of the fact that the expression "Medieval Bratislava" is quite unhistorical ,for which either the template should be deleted or, it should be moved under the name of Medieval Pressburg as is used in the English language when we speak about history of Slovakia ,mentioning location names in historical context from before 1918. Also, we have a valid guidance on how to apply these geographical and location names as for Slovak-Hungarian relation. For the sake of avoiding more confusion, I would like to ask you to familiarize yourself with the aforementioned naming convention.Furthermore, I do not see both the consistence and logic along which your template was created. For instance, I do not understand the reason why "Rusovce mansion" and "Devín Castle" are included in your template when it is obvious that Devin (Dévény) and Rusovce (Oroszvár) never belonged to the medieval Pressburg.--Nmate (talk) 18:27, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your comment and for noticing my work here. You are right, both "Rusovce mansion" and "Devín Castle" should definitely not be on the list. As far as naming the template goes, I do not have the time now to take a closer look at it, but I will do so in the future. Well, what do you know, it turns out I don't have as much free time for Wikipedia as I thought. I will try to do my best, though.
There is a template called Template:Medieval churches in Tytsjerksteradiel on Wikipedia and the article on Tytsjerksteradiel states that "until 1989 the official name of the municipality was Tietjerksteradeel" and who knows how it was actually called in say, 7th century? Now, I'm no history expert but it just seems more logical to address it by its actual name, especially if it's a template and I think the same would apply here. Perhaps a Wikipedia policy addresses this issue... I'm still familiarizing myself with those so it will take some time for me to be sure.

WP:BABEL (another question)

Hello Brutalhovno, I have one another question to you. I would like to know how well you can speak English.--Nmate (talk) 19:10, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, that is no problem, just check out my contributions and while doing it, please correct any mistakes you find. Thanks.

Replaceable fair use File:Jan_Ducky_body_LQ.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Jan_Ducky_body_LQ.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 11:54, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In Ľubomír Galko, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Stupava (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:31, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In Devín Carpathians, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Endemic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Russian Journalists

I started a discussion at the template you created. I would like to get your input on how to clarify it. Thanks, Crtew (talk) 03:44, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Public restrooms in Bratislava for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Public restrooms in Bratislava is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Public restrooms in Bratislava until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 18:14, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Biography of Living Persons policy

With respect to the article on Ivan Lexa, I need to call your attention to our policy. [[WP:BLP], about the Biography of Living Persons. All possibly controversial information must be specifically referenced to references providing substantial coverage from 3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases. Any language is OK, but if they are non-English a translation of the key phrase is advisable. I placed several {{citation needed}} tags to indicate particularly critical places, but the article in general needs improvement in this regard. I see that the Czech and slovak Wikipedias do not have references, but our policy here at the English Wikipedia strictly requires them in such cases. As reviewing administrator, I would have been justified in summarily removing all unreferenced material, but since the references probably do exist, I've temporarily left them in so you can add them. I advise you to fix the problem, and do this very quickly, before the material gets removed, DGG ( talk ) 20:11, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 6

Hi. When you recently edited Mikuláš Dzurinda, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gypsy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:02, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 13

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Botanical Garden of the Comenius University (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Roses

Penta (investment group) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Cypriot

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 25

Hi. When you recently edited Jesuit Church, Bratislava, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Presbytery and Church (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Slovak name (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Vojtech

Vydrica (river) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to ASML

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 03:33, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Little Carpathians, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vysoká (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sport in Slovakia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Swimming (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:16, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Drug policy of Slovakia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Doctor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bratislavský lesný park, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Romans (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of mammals of Slovakia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dama (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alojz Rigele, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Painter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dúbravka, Bratislava, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Democratic Union (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:22, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Brutal Assault 2007 Poster.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Brutal Assault 2007 Poster.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:31, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Brutal Assault 2010 Poster.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Brutal Assault 2010 Poster.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:49, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Brutal Assault 2006 Poster.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Brutal Assault 2006 Poster.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:50, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Brutal Assault 2008 Poster.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Brutal Assault 2008 Poster.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:50, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jozef Rohac Interpol.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jozef Rohac Interpol.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Rosenzweig (talk) 20:39, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Obscene Extreme

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Obscene Extreme requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organized event (tour, function, meeting, party, etc.), but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Epeefleche (talk) 19:56, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Brutal Assault

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Brutal Assault requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organized event (tour, function, meeting, party, etc.), but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Laun chba ller 17:26, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Brutal Assault for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brutal Assault is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brutal Assault until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Laun chba ller 17:29, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Brutalhovno. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited St. Nicholas' Church, Bratislava, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Turkish. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of the Jews in Bratislava, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Podhradie. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:07, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem on History of the Jews in Bratislava

Material you included in the above article appears to have been copied from various copyright web pages elsewhere online. Please see the page history for a list of these sources. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, much of the content had to be removed. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:45, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the edit you are mostly correct. My mistake. Brutalhovno (talk) 10:22, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Brutalhovno. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Brutalhovno. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Realize your potential for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Realize your potential is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Realize your potential until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. valereee (talk) 12:28, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bratislava Trnavske Myto Underpass Public Toilets LQ.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bratislava Trnavske Myto Underpass Public Toilets LQ.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kuttappan Chettan (talk) 13:24, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ľubomír Harman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ľubomír Harman, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ľubomír Harman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]