User talk:Brentonstrine

Nomination of Piano tilter for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Piano tilter is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Piano tilter until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 05:07, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Answer to your query re Piano tilters

There is a Wikipedia policy stating WP is not a dictionary: Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Second, having a book use a word does not constitute a source. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 14:43, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think there's a difference between a stub that needs to be expanded and a dictionary entry. That source isn't great, but it's a start, and it does more than merely _use_ the word. At any rate, I'm glad we're discussing whether this article should be deleted, instead of having it wiped out with no discussion at all as if it were spam. The guidelines for deletion even have sections for discussing articles that are patent nonsense and spam, so even if it was pure spam, it's not out of bounds to have a discussion before deleting the entire thing wholesale. Consider that many people (and women especially) are turned off to contributing to Wikipedia because they put time and effort into helping and then have all of their work mercilessly erased without any warning.

Disambiguation link notification for August 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ben Chestnut, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CRM. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Potential renal acid load

Hello, Brentonstrine. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Potential renal acid load, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:06, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Potential renal acid load

Hello, Brentonstrine. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Potential renal acid load".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:53, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]