User talk:Branis1av77

Welcome!

Hello, Branis1av77, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! The Rambling Man (talk) 21:45, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

UEFA Champions League

Please stop edit-warring and take the discussion to the article's talk page. Thanks. The Rambling Man (talk) 21:45, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Serbian flag?

Munich has never been in East Germany, so Bayern Munich would have no business using the East German flag; furthermore, the flag of West Germany is exactly the same as the flag of modern day Germany, so there is no argument there. As for the Romanians, I would actually argue for their flag to be changed to the old flag (although since Romania exists in the same form now as it did then, while Yugoslavia does not exist at all, I could equally argue for no change whatsoever). Either way, I do not think that we should be using the Serbian flag for Red Star or Partizan. – Pee Jay 23:29, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to consider reading WP:AGF before you ever talk to me again. – Pee Jay 17:26, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Who's threatening? But you're assuming that I have something against Serbians when there is no evidence for that. Regardless, your argument about the German and Romanian clubs is irrelevant to this discussion. Romania's borders have not changed, only the governmental regime, and Germany was unified, not dissolved as Yugoslavia was. The only difference between the country that Steaua Bucharest represented in 1986 and 1989, and modern day Romania is the flag and the government it represented. Serbia, on the other hand, did not even exist as a separate nation when Red Star and Partizan reached their finals. – Pee Jay 17:41, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

How many times must I tell you I am not bashing Serbia in any way, it is only your patriotism that is blinding you to that fact. – Pee Jay 14:59, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nalupetao si toliko gluposti da je sramota da uopste spominjes srpski narod... Ti pre svega ne umes da se skoncentrises na temu nego lupetas gluposti koje nemaju veze sa vezom. Kakve veze ima koliko "srba" ima u timu Zvezde 1991? Je si li ti svestan da je tim srpski zato sto je on iz Beograda, Srbije, i da bi potpuno isto bio srpski i da igraju sve stranci u njemu? Uostalom, u Zvezdinom timu 1991 je bilo 14 igraca van Srbije, sto cini da skoro pola tima bude van srpsko, ali to je tvoj kompleks, kao da je to bitno... A najludje je sto ti to govoris englezu coveku koji uopste ne razmislja o ovome, i koji je bas ponosan na svoj Mancester zato sto u njemu igraju svetski dobri igraci, a ne neki lokalni seljosi... To do tebe ne dopire uopste? On te covek nije ni razumeo verovatno, jer on ni ne shvata sta hoces da kazes sa time da je klub "vise srpski" ili "vise engleski"... Koji seoski mentalitet, Boze me sacuvaj. I mesas Teslu u pricu kao da je on jedini poznat srbin, ka da smo neki jadnicci koji moraju da se hvataju za Teslu da bi neko uopste znao ko smo... Strasno koliko si se obrukao i nas narod sa onakvim komentarima. Samo da znas, taj editor veze nema sa nama i niti nas voli, niti nas mrzi. Ali kad se neko suoci sa tako tvrdoglavo glupim argumentima kao tvojim, ti ga prosto nateras da se zainati. Sta da ti kazem, Zvezda je te sezone predstavljala Jugoslaviju, a ne Srbiju, isto kao sto i Dinamo Kijev je predstavljao SSSR a ne Ukrajnu. Smiri se bre covece, budi patriota tako sto ces lepe stvari o nama prikazivati, a ne sve najgore kao sto si uradio. Bruka ziva. FkpCascais (talk) 16:57, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pratio sam diskusiju, i razumem poentu, i zato ti upravo i govorim da nisi imao potrebe da skreces sa teme, da se viktimizujes, niti da se prepires sa covekom oko trivijalnih stvari i skoro ga vredjas, niti da guras nacionalizam u sve ovo. A onaj nas rezon o tome da je klub "vise srpski" nego Mancester engleski to je kumulus svega. FkpCascais (talk) 18:49, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ih bre kad je to bilo, to je bilo pre nego sto sam uopste pricao sa tobom. Jeste preterao sam, izvinjavam ti se , ti si platio ceh nekih drugih nasih likova koji su ranije imali slicne i gore stavove. Iznerviralo me mnogo kad sam video taj nastup da "ucimo nekoga istoriju" a narocito ono da je Zvezda kao veca jer je imala manje stranaca. U sustini, ovo drugo je ono sto me najvise iznerviralo, ne mogu nikako da shvatim to razmisljanje. Pa zar ne vidis sam u praksi u Americi kako je mnogo bolje biti zemlja koja je privlacna ljudima iz drugih krajeva sveta, kako je dobro kad imas moc da angazujes i dovedes strane talente da igraju za tvoj klub, ili inace, klubove iz tvoje zemlje? Zar ne shvatas da smo mi upravo bili tada jaki jer su talenti iz nase okoline zeleli da dodju u Srbiju da igraju za nase klubove? Zar nije upravo cast sto su Prosinecki, Vokri, Pancev, Zahovic, Sabanadzovic dosli u nase klubove da igraju za nas? Ili je bolje danas kada igramo sami sa sobom i kada ni placajuci vise igraci iz tih krajeva nece da nam dodju? Pa englezi, portugalci, spanci, a sad i rumuni, bugari, rusi, su bas ponosni jer mogu da dovode strane igrace, dok mi jadni jos ne kapiramo koliko je jadno sto tesko ko pristane da igra kod nas. Nasi bre idu u Albaniju da igraju, ej! Zar ne bi trebali oni (njihovi najbolji igraci) da igraju za nase klubove? Ono kad si ti rekao njemu kako je klub "vise srpski", pa ljudi u svetu samo mogu da misle, "da, jadnicci samo srbi im igraju u klubovima, kad niko drugi nece tamo da ide...". Stvar je potpuno obrnuta od te kako ti i mnogi kod nas shvataju. Pa gruzijci ne vole ruse zbog cele situacije, ali ipak idu i te kako u Rusiju da tamo igraju, pa to je kumulus snage, kada ti "neprijatelj" igra za tebe, a ti uzivas kao gospodin i gledas kako oni igraju u tvojoj ligi. A ne kao sad kada samo nase gledamo, i to one koji nisu nasli angazman u... Albaniji i Azerbeidzanu... tuzno.

Sto se tice teme zastavica, bila je diskusija koju verovatno nisi video, koja je bila ovde. Pogledaj pa mi kazi sta mislis da treba da se uradi. Uglavnom, ne moras nikoga da "ucis istoriju", znaju oni za Jugoslaviju i nas, a ja ako ista volim, to je istorija narocito naseg regiona, poenta je samo da postoji "consistency", i tu tebe podrzavam. FkpCascais (talk) 20:06, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Matija Nastasić without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Mattythewhite (talk) 18:27, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Matija Nastasić

Hi, do you have a source for Nastasić having 10 caps for Serbia U21s; Soccerway only list six. Cheers, Mattythewhite (talk) 19:31, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Serbia national football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James McCarthy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, 10.4.0.34 (talk) 08:58, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Branis1av77. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]