User talk:Boricua78

February 2015

Your recent editing history at Teodor Atanasiu shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. bonadea contributions talk 16:03, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Teodor Atanasiu, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Deunanknute (talk) 18:57, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Teodor Atanasiu.

You need to discuss your proposed changes on the article's talk page instead of simply reverting back to them. Four different editors disagree with your changes, for various reasons, including the fact that your version is written in unidiomatic English, and that it includes unsourced non-neutral text. Please discuss on the talk page and do not revert back again. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 18:58, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:22, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

--MelanieN (talk) 05:14, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Boricua78, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

bonadea contributions talk 09:56, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Let me explain

Hello, Boricua78. You have recently been violating several Wikipedia rules; maybe you didn't know about them. Let me explain, so that you don't keep doing what you are doing, which might get you blocked from editing permanently.

WP:Edit warring. This means that you have repeatedly made edits to a particular article, edits that other users don't agree with. Several other editors have reverted your edits, but you kept adding them. You must not do this. Wikipedia works by consensus, not by one person insisting on their own version. The only way you will be able to insert this material is to EXPLAIN, on the article talk page, why you think it belongs there. Your argument must be based on Wikipedia's requirement for independent reliable sources. If you have good sources, you will be able to convince the other people or reach some compromise on wording. While you are discussing, DO NOT keep adding the wording you want; if you do you will be blocked again for a longer time. So far all you have done on the talk page is to insist that you are right and to repeat "I need an administrator." No, you don't. Admins do not settle content disputes. Disagreements between users must be worked out between the users, politely and with evidence.
WP:Block evasion and WP:Sockpuppetry. You created new accounts so that you could keep editing while you are blocked. Those accounts are known as sockpuppets and are against Wikipedia rules. Block evasion is also against the rules. Either one is grounds for a block.

Normally I would extend the length of your block because of your block evasion, but I am going to assume you didn't realize it was against the rules. However, I wlll be watching to see what you do when your block expires. If you resume edit warring or sockpuppetry, you can expect a longer block. By the way, even while you are blocked from other editing, you can still post here on your talk page. --MelanieN (talk) 19:26, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

You have been blocked from editing for a period of two weeks for sock puppetry. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 19:40, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]