User talk:BlueLibrarian

Welcome!

Hello, BlueLibrarian, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Historicity of Jesus does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
Tutorial
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! tgeorgescu (talk) 11:16, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi BlueLibrarian! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Jeppiz (talk) 13:30, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Richard Amerike. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 13:48, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from continuing the spreading of old myths and misconceptions. If you continue this practice in the future we might take drastic measures of administrative character. BlueLibrarian (talk) 08:50, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Amerigo Vespucci, you may be blocked from editing. Doug Weller talk 13:51, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 12:56, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid reasoning unsupported by evidence. Block rejected. BlueLibrarian (talk) 08:50, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #74139

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:31, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]