User talk:Bloodanzel

Welcome!

Hello, Bloodanzel, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Sophie moone, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! - Burpelson AFB ✈ 17:53, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sophie moone

The article Sophie moone has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. - Burpelson AFB ✈ 17:53, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of Sophie moone

A tag has been placed on Sophie moone requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. • Gene93k (talk) 13:53, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that that Sophie Moone was deleted by editor consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sophie Moone • Gene93k (talk) 13:53, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your question at Talk:Sophie moone: Sophie Moone does not meet Wikipedia's notability guideline. The article was deleted at Articles for Deletion for that reason. The latest version did not fix the notability problems. It cited unreliable sources and Sophie Moone appears to lack non-trivial coverage by reliable sources. She also fails Wikipedia's notability guideline for pornographic actors. • Gene93k (talk) 20:07, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]