User talk:Bleff

Archives

DYK for Fernet con coca

On 29 June 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Fernet con coca, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the combination of fernet and cola (example pictured) is so popular in Argentina that the country consumes more than 75 percent of all fernet produced globally? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Fernet con coca. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Fernet con coca), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—valereee (talk) 00:01, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Zachary Laoutides, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Latino (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Clyde Bawden

Hello, Bleff,

Thank you for creating Clyde Bawden.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for this work. If you'd let me take an opportunity to clarify notability for musicians, albums and tracks: articles that simply report performance dates, release information or track listings. Could we look to more robust references for this article?

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 08:10, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please include required attribution at Travesti (gender identity)

Bleff, thanks for your contributions to Travesti (gender identity). Two points to keep in mind: one, is about including an edit summary with each of your edits. I'll leave you a separate message about that later.

More important, is that you must obey Wikipedia's licensing requirements regarding Copyright, which includes copying or translating content from another language Wikipedia. If you are adding content to Travesti (gender identity) that is translated from es:Travesti (identidad de género) (now deleted, by Marcelo (es:Usuario:Marcelo) then you must include proper attribution for the translated content, every time you hit the "Publish" button. For details, see WP:TFOLWP.

I believe that you have added a lot of content that has been translated from es-wiki, without attribution. This needs to be fixed. You can do this, by following the instructions at WP:RIA. If you need help with that, please ask, but this is not optional; it must be done, per Wikipedia's licensing requirements, and Copyright law.

Going forward, please make sure that for every edit you make to Travesti (gender identity), you add an attribution statement to the edit summary, of this form:

Content in this edit is translated from the Spanish Wikipedia article at [[:es:Travesti (identidad de género)]]; see its history for attribution.

There is a question in my mind about how to handle the attribution, given that the history in the original article has disappeared after the A5 deletion. I will seek additional assistance on this point, and get back to you, or you can follow along or contribute to the discussion here. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 00:33, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and I have one question for you. Can you explain what the content of the page User:Bleff/sandbox3 (permalink) is? Did you write this? Copy it from someplace? Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 01:04, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mathglot, I am sorry for the confusion. I am the writer of the original Spanish-language "Travesti (identidad de género)" article that you are mentioning, so I figured that I didn't need to attribute myself. I developed the article on my user sandbox on the Spanish-language Wikipedia for some months, and you can see that here. I then created the article which was unfortunately deleted almost immediately, which was a great shame for me and I considered tremendously unfair. Now, in order not to discard all that effort, I decided that it would be best to adapt that content for the article in English (Travesti (gender identity)), which has existed for a quite a time and has various issues; I copied and pasted the Spanish text in User:Bleff/sandbox3 to work more comfortably in the translation and adaptation of sources. Please let me know if i'm doing things wrong. Regards, --Bleff (talk) 15:22, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Bleff, thanks for your comment. If you wrote the original Spanish article, I think you might be right about the attribution. I think you're doing everything okay, but I'll get back to you. One thing, though: the existing article was in pretty terrible shape even before you got there. Large chunks of it are completely unsourced, and sound like someone's personal anecdote. All that stuff has to come out. That doen'ts mean you're responsible for it, I'm just saying, that you shouldn't feel shy about just removing and replacing the current content with your content, as long as your content is properly sourced. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 18:34, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please add an edit summary with every edit

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your last dozen or so edits to Travesti (gender identity) do not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Mathglot (talk) 01:07, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Ni una menos.png

Thanks for uploading File:Ni una menos.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:20, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with File:People from Argentina.png

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:People from Argentina.png.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:58, 12 May 2021 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Dylsss^{(talk contribs)} 18:58, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Françoise Hardy, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages French music and Heartache.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Manuela Pedraza, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Patriot.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Tanguito Tango portada.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tanguito Tango portada.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:10, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Françoise Hardy

On 24 June 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Françoise Hardy, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that French singer-songwriter Françoise Hardy (pictured) was admired by musicians such as the Beatles, the Rolling Stones and Bob Dylan during the 1960s? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Françoise Hardy. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Françoise Hardy), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work on this! It's not easy to do a 5x expansion on such a significant page. {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 06:45, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! --🩸 𝗕𝗹𝗲𝗳𝗳 🩸 (talk) 01:18, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Argentine music and sweets

Thank you for quality articles around today's music and it's creators such as Françoise Hardy, Almendra (Almendra album), La balsa and All Is Full of Love, including sound files and images, for Argentine sweets and desserts and Fernet con coca, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

You are recipient no. 2619 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:14, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much!🩸 𝗕𝗹𝗲𝗳𝗳 🩸 (talk) 01:18, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 45,194 views (1,883.1 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of June 2021 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 01:04, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review for vespertine

Hi, just a notice regarding the peer review for vespertine. I was going to archive it for inactivity, but I wanted to check in if you still wanted to work on the feedback left there. Zetana (talk) 02:30, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Zetana, I may work on the feedback given, but later on. Feel free to archive it. Thank you --🩸 𝗕𝗹𝗲𝗳𝗳 🩸 (talk) 15:33, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, no problem. I've archived it for now. Zetana (talk) 20:00, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October reviews

It seems like your GAN for Pic-Nic is listed for almost as long as my GAN nomination for the music group BTS. If you could do the review for the BTS article then I could offer to do the review for your nomination to try to move the articles forward. What do you think? ErnestKrause (talk) 14:37, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ErnestKrause! I'll pass. I don't feel confident enough to review a GAN yet. I'm sorry. I wish you the best of luck in your nomination. --🩸 𝗕𝗹𝗲𝗳𝗳 🩸 (talk) 19:01, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ni una menos.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ni una menos.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:47, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Pic-Nic

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Pic-Nic you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 18:01, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Pic-Nic

The article Pic-Nic you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Pic-Nic for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 18:20, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Pic-Nic

The article Pic-Nic you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Pic-Nic for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 19:41, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Article of potential interest

Hi Bleff! I came across your article on India Juliana, so I wanted to give you a heads up that an editor recently came to the Teahouse seeking to write about another 16th-century Guaraní figure in Paraguay, Lambaré (chieftain). I started a draft for them at Draft:Lambaré (chieftain). They haven't made any further edits yet, but if you're interested, they might be a good candidate to mentor, or you might be able to help them develop the draft further into an article. Cheers, {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 19:47, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sdkb. I think I can help the editor! Thanks --🩸 𝗕𝗹𝗲𝗳𝗳 🩸 (talk) 21:24, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of India Juliana

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article India Juliana you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of An anonymous username, not my real name -- An anonymous username, not my real name (talk) 23:21, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of India Juliana

The article India Juliana you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:India Juliana for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of An anonymous username, not my real name -- An anonymous username, not my real name (talk) 02:21, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cordoba Montage 2011.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cordoba Montage 2011.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 03:29, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Javiera Mena, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page I Am What I Am.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of best-selling Latin albums

@Rumba Samba Mambo: (just in case): Hey there! I just thought you might want to know that List of best-selling Latin albums in case you might know of any albums by an Argentine artist that has at least sold 2 million copies. Erick (talk) 22:56, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Asuncion Montage.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Asuncion Montage.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ✗plicit 03:59, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

TatiVogue (talk) 15:32, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Artaud tapa original.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Artaud tapa original.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:03, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Undisclosed paid editing

Hello Bleff. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Bleff. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Bleff|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 198.52.183.144 (talk) 04:10, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 198.52.183.144, thank you for the explanation. I am very passionate about editing Wikipedia and I do it for pure pleasure, I would say 99% of the time. During the pandemic I decided to join Upwork due to the serious economic crisis in my country, although always trying to ensure that these requests have merit to have their own article. I'm sorry I didn't do it the right way out of ignorance. Junedude433's example is useful, I'll take his example. The majority of Upwork inquiries were paid advice that did not turn into articles (since almost all the proposals are articles without merit of existing). Articles I have written for hire at Upwork are EyeMail Inc., Lisa S. Jones, John D. Wagner and two paragraphs for Richard Turley (graphic designer). I don't think I've missed any other but I'll check it out. All the best, 🩸 𝗕𝗹𝗲𝗳𝗳 🩸 (talk) 23:30, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Upwork profile

Hi. Firstly, thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Great work by you. I can see you have worked on a couple of paid jobs, accepted on Upwork. Can you please comply fully comply with WP:PAID (one of the requirements is to link your Upwork profile or any other marketplace where you offer your servces, and second, disclose all the jobs here, not selectively). Also, dislcosure like this incomplete, please use standard template shared with you earlier. For example, you can follow User:Junedude433's example. Cheers. 198.52.183.144 (talk) 04:21, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 198.52.183.144, thank you for the explanation. I am very passionate about editing Wikipedia and I do it for pure pleasure, I would say 99% of the time. During the pandemic I decided to join Upwork due to the serious economic crisis in my country, although always trying to ensure that these requests have merit to have their own article. I'm sorry I didn't do it the right way out of ignorance. Junedude433's example is useful, I'll take his example. The majority of Upwork inquiries were paid advice that did not turn into articles (since almost all the proposals are articles without merit of existing). Articles I have written for hire at Upwork are EyeMail Inc., Lisa S. Jones, John D. Wagner and two paragraphs for Richard Turley (graphic designer). I don't think I've missed any other but I'll check it out. All the best, 🩸 𝗕𝗹𝗲𝗳𝗳 🩸 (talk) 23:29, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Pagina12 2011.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pagina12 2011.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Imagofagia

The article Imagofagia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 16:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Women's cinema, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Las modelos.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ushuaia Montage.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ushuaia Montage.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:07, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

— Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 06:22, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:32, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Zoo Buenos Aires logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Zoo Buenos Aires logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:02, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Francoise Hardy in Paco Rabanne minidress.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Francoise Hardy in Paco Rabanne minidress.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:11, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]