User talk:Bleach1983

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andrew J. Caton, Ph.D. (February 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Andrew J. Caton, Ph.D..
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Anon126 (talk - contribs) 21:19, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Bleach1983, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Your submission at AfC Dario Altieri was accepted

Dario Altieri, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks!

WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 16:48, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia

Let me offer you a belated welcome! You appear to have gotten off to a mixed start at creating articles. As you can see, I've approved your article about Dario Altieri, but your article about Dr. Canton was not approved, for the reasons shown above. Further, your article about Meenhard Herlyn, D.V.M., D.Sc. has some issues I'd like to discuss with you.

We don't put honorific titles in article titles. See WP:MOSNAME. For this reason, I have moved the article to Meenhard Herlyn.
I'm a tad confused. Herlyn is listed as a D.V.M. (a veterinarian), yet you have written about him as a physician, a term generally understood to refer to doctors who treat human patients. As far as Herlyn's research is concerned, the difference may be a small one, but I think it would be best to describe Herlyn as either a veterinarian, or simply as a researcher, to avoid confusion.
The article relies too heavily on the Wistar website, which is considered a primary source (i.e. one closely connected with the subject) and therefore, not reliably neutral on the subject. More secondary sources are needed. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 17:01, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bleach1983. You have new messages at Bleach1983's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello,

Thanks for your suggestions. Yes, I am relatively new to Wikipedia, so I've been going through similar pages to see which ones might serve as good templates for what I'm trying to create. In the meantime, I have found additional secondary resources for my article so that it is less reliant on the primary resource of The Wistar Institute website. Please let me know if the changes I've made help. Thanks!

Hi. Just out of curiosity, since you seem to be creating mainly pages about people who work at the Wistar Institute, do you have some connection to this institute? If so, please read WP:PSCOI. Jinkinson talk to me 18:04, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Andrew J. Caton, Ph.D. concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Andrew J. Caton, Ph.D., a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Andrew J. Caton, Ph.D.

Hello Bleach1983. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Andrew J. Caton, Ph.D.".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Andrew J. Caton, Ph.D.}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 04:01, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]